Tremendous Power of the Individ
Topics:
"The Tremendous Power of the Individual"
"Global Changes in Government"
"Everyone Wants to Be Heard"
"Healing the Planet and Ourselves"
Session #201511241
"The Tremendous Power of the Individual"
"Global Changes in Government"
"Everyone Wants to Be Heard"
"Healing the Planet and Ourselves"
Tuesday, November 24, 2015 (Private)
Participants: Mary (Michael, Participant: Jean-François (Samta) and Adam (Avril)
ELIAS: Good morning!
JEAN-FRANCOIS AND ADAM: Good morning.
ELIAS: And what shall we discuss?
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Well, today I'd like to discuss mostly tarot.
ELIAS: Very well.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: And I do have other questions before that.
ELIAS: Very well.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: A little quick verification: the toy train talking to me a couple days ago (Elias chuckles)—whose energy was that? Is it you? Is it Patel?
ELIAS: (Chuckles) Patel.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Patel. That's his style.
ELIAS: (Chuckles). Quite.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Previously we had discussed how quickly our collective awareness is increasing, and it was at the point of doubling every six months. My impression is that we have moved way beyond that doubling every six months and it's a lot faster now.
ELIAS: I would agree.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Yeah. Is it every three months, or not quite?
ELIAS: Not quite, but close.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Like four months, right?
ELIAS: Yes.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: And has the speed increased since the group session?
ELIAS: Slightly, yes.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: It does feel like a lot faster. It does feel…I don't know, I feel like I have an expanded awareness compared to even two months ago.
ELIAS: I would agree. And I would express that that would be, in varying degrees, the situation with most individuals.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Yes.
ELIAS: Even individuals that are not privy to this information, even individuals that are moving in what seem to be entirely different directions. It has no bearing on their awareness and the expansion of it; is merely a matter of how they are using it and channeling it, in a manner of speaking. But yes, the awareness globally is increasing tremendously.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: You have mentioned recently that we have only begun to scrape the surface about coming changes globally. You know we touched upon a little bit the natural expressions that are building, and I was wondering a little bit about the social/political aspects of that. I don't necessarily want to go into that in detail right now, but I do have one question in relation to that: are we likely to go in a direction globally where the structures of power that we currently know as nations, is that likely to sort of break down more and we'll end up with smaller bodies of power or units of power? Not necessarily like city-states, but you know, something reduced from these more larger nations—or are we likely to go in the opposite direction and going to something that has that one world government type of expression?
ELIAS: In the manner in which you are moving, it is more likely to be moving in the latter direction. But I would not express that as a blanket statement, for I would say that it is a potential for there to be somewhat of both. Not in the capacity of government as you know it now, or even what you know of, of city-states or anything in that kind of a direction, but more in the capacity of, in a manner of speaking, communities directing themselves but in conjunction or in cooperation with a larger whole; but not in the structure that you are familiar with, not in the structure of what you know now as different ideologies of government and structures of governments.
At this point in your history, you have explored different philosophies of governments and have established them quite strongly and quite well, none of which serve you. Therefore the deviation from that is likely to be more in a direction of a global type of structure, which is very different from what you are accustomed to, but that allows for the expression and the autonomy of communities that move in harmony and in cooperation with the whole.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Sort of like a federation.
ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, yes. And in that, generating directions that serve the whole but that are more expansive, which eventually are not that far futurely, will include a resurgence in the interest in your space exploration. For this expansion and this restructuring of your planet in relation to government, which will not necessarily be a government any longer, will require something more, something larger, to create that adhesion.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: To create a unity of the human on earth.
ELIAS: Yes. Yes.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: We will have a larger frame of reference to create that unity.
ELIAS: Yes, for your planet is not big enough. Or what you explore here with your planet, regardless of philosophy or science or whatever direction you choose to explore, you have come to a point in which your expansion in relation to the confines of your planet are almost exhausted. You require more to explore, and you have an entire universe. You have incorporated all of this time throughout your history to evolve and to explore your planet. Now you are moving in the direction of exploring ideas and technology, and the technology is outgrowing the planet. It requires more to explore, more expansiveness to investigate and to explore and to use it, for your rate of development technologically is moving so quickly and is expanding so tremendously that it literally is outgrowing you in relation to how you can use it in relation to your planet alone, and therefore the next step is to move beyond your planet and to begin exploring your universe.
And in that, very similar to ancient peoples, expanding and exploring new areas of your world, and even identifying that in terms of new worlds within your own world ;and in that, you have explored your world to the fullest. There is no corner of your world that you have not explored; and in that, it has encouraged you and inspired you to begin to develop new manners of expansion, which is the reason you move in the direction of your technology. For that allows you to continue to expand and continue to explore and to express more, but that is developing so rapidly that it is outgrowing the confines of what you can do with it in relation to your planet alone.
Yes, there are new directions that you can invent in relation to your technology that can be used in relation to your planet, but it is finite. There is a limited amount that you can do and that you can expand and that you can explore in relation to technology only in association with your planet alone.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: I was listening to an interview with Graham Hancock this morning about his new book, and generally speaking, is he correct or accurate when he talks about a civilization that was more or less wiped out about 12,000-13,000 years ago and that this came about through pieces of comet hitting the earth? And then it created floods and all sorts of things.
ELIAS: These are interesting stories, for I would express yes, but also that the reasons for different civilizations that have evolved and, in a manner of speaking, been somewhat of predecessors to you—which that would not necessarily be an entire predecessor at that time—but in a figurative manner of speaking, developmentally-wise, there have been several that have, in a manner of speaking, become extinct. The reasons are not necessarily what individuals have identified yet.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Yeah. I mean, I understand that something like the comet is it might be an outward manifestation, but that's not the underlying reason necessarily—it's a method.
ELIAS: I would express that it is not even the method. I would say to you, yes, that that is correct, but not necessarily in relation to a comet or an asteroid or any of those types of phenomena.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: In relation to that particular civilization?
ELIAS: Correct.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Okay. All right. Okay, well it's fascinating, but I'll leave it at that for now. (Elias laughs) Because there are so many fascinating subjects.
Just before going into the tarot, I want to talk a little about healing, a little update. I've been practicing a little bit applying hands to, with other people, to participate and cooperate in healing actions. This Sunday evening I was doing it with Adam. He had a migraine, and I did not identify Twyla's participation that evening. I mean, I didn't notice the usual types of sensations that I associate with Twyla. But my first question is, was Twyla participating?
ELIAS: Partially briefly.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Okay, so it was accurate that it was not as what I've noticed before.
ELIAS: Yes.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Okay. But Adam's migraine went out completely. But I've done this type of action with him before, and it's not always, not necessarily that kind of effect. Is the difference this time that he was more relaxed and more allowing of the energy?
(A jet airplane flies noisily overhead.)
ELIAS: No accidents. (Chuckles.)
JEAN-FRANCOIS: What is this?
ADAM: Yes, what's happening?
ELIAS: (Quietly) A jet.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Yes.
ELIAS: Not an airline. There are tremendous forces of energy in play presently, and there is a tremendous surge in energy in relation to actions that are occurring throughout your world, and there is a TREMENDOUS expression of unrest and fear that is occurring which is creating a tremendous alert. And that, my friends, is in your terms a signal of warning of how much high alert is being expressed, even in areas that seem to be not a part of or sleepy little towns. Even those areas that are small and seem unaffected are not.
When I express to you that there are tremendous changes occurring and that they are occurring in your terms in your own backyards, they are.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: We can feel the escalation.
ADAM: Yeah, but I guess my energy is curious. Is…you know, what is over reacting? What are we preparing for? We have these discussions, and I wonder how close is it going to get to where I have to stand up for myself, and would it become physical? Is it going to be a combative type of thing? Is this going to be "I do not want the implant government"? You know, "Don't implant me with a chip"?
ELIAS: Now, this is precisely what I am expressing, that type of reaction. That is an excellent example. And this is what it is escalating into in other countries, and it is moving rapidly in that direction in your country. And it is all being fueled by that tremendous fire of fear, and I would TREMENDOUSLY suggest that you NOT move in that direction.
Let me express to you: I have expressed many, many times how you all ripple out and how you are all affecting of energy collectively in relation to what you do yourselves in your own individual lives and activity. But let me also express: all of that collective also is being received by you and is affecting. It is not one direction; it is both directions. Therefore, it is a matter of first BEING aware, being self-aware and recognizing what you are doing, and also recognizing that the expression of the collective is very strong, and do you want to participate in that or not? And remember: there is a difference between being invested and being involved.
And not being involved is not being isolationist or being apathetic. It is choosing what you will involve yourselves with. You ARE invested in yourselves, in those other individuals that you care about, that you love, that are important to you—but beyond that, remember that you are all interconnected, and therefore even individuals that you do not know, even individuals that are strangers and that are in other countries, you are interconnected with them. And in that, what is occurring with some is occurring with all in some capacities. In this, you are also invested in all those other individuals, for they are a part of your world and you are invested in your world.
The first significant point to not involve yourselves in the expression of fear is to not be reacting and to be recognizing that the most significant expression that is occurring within your world at this present moment is every individual wanting to be witnessed, everyone wanting to be heard and acknowledged as important. And when individuals feel our group interaction and feelings and paying attention to them, when individuals feel unimportant, not heard, not seen, not listened to, not acknowledged, they become louder.
You all do it. Even in your individual lives in your sleepy little towns. If you are engaging a conversation with another individual and you in a moment feel that you are not being heard or you are not being understood, you raise your volume of your voice. That is what many individuals are doing presently. They are not being acknowledged, they are not being heard, they are not perceiving that they are understood or recognized—definitely not being witnessed—and therefore they are becoming very loud.
They are a significant minority. But look to your history. It is always the minority that becomes very loud, that wields fear through action that wields power.
That is what you think gives you the attention that acknowledges your importance—to be forceful. And in that, what it does is it influences many, many, many, many, many other individuals to be afraid, and the more afraid individuals are, the more they are not paying attention to themselves, the more they are fixed on paying attention to what is outside of them, and the more important it is for all of you that do incorporate information and that have expanded your awareness to PRACTICE being those examples.
Once again, referring to our group interaction, what do you pay attention to? And how easy it is to pay attention to what you perceive to be negative, and how automatic it is. And even in your conversations when you are engaged with each other, what do you speak about? Do you speak about your accomplishments? Do you speak about what a lovely day it is? Do you speak about what you appreciate? Or do you speak about the idiot that generated some stupid action in the street the previous day? Or some irritating individual that influenced you in having a bad day and not accomplishing what you wanted to accomplish? Or not even in relation to another individual, that something broke, or that the weather is so cold it froze a plant or that—
JEAN-FRANCOIS: There is no ladle.
ELIAS: Anything. Anything. You are approaching your holiday of thanks, are you not? In your country presently?
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Yeah.
ELIAS: What are you being grateful and thankful for? Or are you paying attention to the knife is not sharp enough to carve the turkey?
ADAM: I'm paying attention to the celebration of the holiday while we're treating the immigrants terribly. It makes me feel like I don't necessarily feel like concentrating on the good.
ELIAS: Now, now stop momentarily. Where are you in present location?
ADAM: Brattleboro, Vermont.
ELIAS: Precisely. And in this particular state of your union, this is one state that is not refusing refugees. And this is where you are presently.
ADAM: I see.
ELIAS: And what are you paying attention to?
ADAM: Right.
ELIAS: That you are in a physical location that you agree with that IS accepting refugees and IS generating an extending hand and being helpful and being accepting? Or are you paying attention to all of the other places in your world that you are not residing in presently that are not doing that.
ADAM: I see.
ELIAS: And that are promoting that fear and anger.
ADAM: Yes. Gotcha.
ELIAS: In this, in relation to your FEELING, that is to be acknowledged. You incorporate opinions, preferences, and your feeling is signaling you in relation to those preferences. But remember, what do you do with that?
In this, yes, acknowledge you disagree with the treatment of these individuals, and you also can acknowledge you can see as an individual that the loudness and the actions of that minority is creating a situation of more fear, which is also influencing these individuals that are refugees, and they are not participating in those actions but they are being faulted for it. And you are definitely entitled to your philosophy, your ideas, your opinions in relation to those situations, and your feeling about that definitely is to be acknowledged—that this is bothersome to you, you do not agree with it, you do not like it.
But then, once again, what do you do in relation to those feelings? They are signals. Do you allow the feeling to dictate your choices and your behavior, and therefore dwell on the feeling? Or do you recognize the message, the statement, that that feeling is signaling you to, and then recognize that you have choices: "I disagree with this, therefore I acknowledge that feeling. It is valid, and I choose not to involve myself in those actions by not perpetuating it. "
How would I be perpetuating it in my sleepy little town? By engaging negative conversations with other individuals about how terrible the situation is and how much I dislike it and am offering no solution, but inviting other individuals to echo me in how much I dislike what is occurring. And are you DOING anything? Oh yes, you are doing something. You are involving yourself in what you don't like and what you don't agree with, and you are participating in it and offering energy to it. Or if you engaging conversations, eliciting that echoing about all of the other individuals that are forming militias to battle this minority.
That is the same. You are contributing to that energy. You are generating an opposing energy. You are inviting other individuals to echo you: "Let us all echo and participate in the discussion of what we all despise."
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Reality porn.
ELIAS: And what does that accomplish? And do not entertain the idea, even for a moment, that it does not affect anything; it does. Your thinking does not project and affect, but when you are verbalizing, when you are expressing that and you are projecting that energy and eliciting other individuals to join in that, oh you are very much participating and affecting, and it is important to be aware. What do you want to be affecting of?
You as one individual are not helpless. You as one individual do make a difference. You do influence. The difficulty is that there are so many one individuals that are thinking I am only one individual and I make no difference, and therefore all of those one individuals continue to influence the very expressions that you disagree with and that you do not want.
In relation to daily activities and what you are participating in, I will extend an acknowledgement to each of you in answer to your question which does tie in to what we are discussing now and your threat of your jet.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: What a timing on that jet! (Laughs)
ELIAS: Your headaches. And in that, yes, you were more open and more allowing. He cannot fix it. He cannot change it. He can manipulate energy and he can facilitate to aid you, but it is YOU who changes it, who affects what is occurring within your body. He is manipulating the energy to aid you, but you hold the key. You actually generate the change, and you do that by allowing.
Now; let me also express to you, it is a cooperation. There is a participation. And you may not be—in physical terms, you at one point may not actually be the one that is reconfiguring the energy in a particular moment. It may BE him. But you have to allow that.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: So that was the big difference. It was his allowing that created the developments, the result that we saw.
ELIAS: Partially, and partially your confidence. It was a cooperation. It was both of you expressing somewhat differently—you expressing more confidence in your ability to manipulate energy, and you allowing that to occur and not blocking or shielding. That was significant, for I would express that there is an element of openness that must be expressed by you to be projecting energy and to be manipulating in relation to another individual's energy, for it is not only your energy that you are actually engaging. You are actually touching the other individual's energy and moving it, and therefore you are physically engaging it. Therefore the confidence in you allowed you to be doing that in a more directed manner and required you being more exposed to you to allow yourself to do that, and for you exposing more of you to you to allow him to engage you, for that is tremendous that you allowed yourself that openness. You have incorporated a shield around yourself for a very long time framework which has been miles thick.
And in that, for you to drop that shield and allow another individual to actually touch you is tremendous. That is a tremendous accomplishment, and it is a tremendous accomplishment for you in expressing that confidence, for that has been an obstacle for you, not being certain.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: It was amazing, because in a matter of ten minutes that migraine was gone, but it can last for days sometimes. I mean, it was easy.
ELIAS: And that is the reality. It is easy.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: It was effortless.
ADAM: He was falling asleep.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Yeah, I was almost asleep.
ELIAS: And in that, what were you doing? You were cooperating with each other in trust and openness. There was no threat that you would be harmed. You could be. You could manipulate energy in a manner that could be harmful if he is open and allowing that and if you were intending that. But with the trust and both of you expressing that openness, what did you generate? You generated accomplishment. You generated removing pain. YOU did that. You both did that—without substance, without surgery, without a physician. You did that. If you can do that with each other, do you not realize what tremendous energy that is? That is POWERFUL. That is a tremendous power.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Can I share another example?
ELIAS: You may.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: I also engaged cooperative healing actions with Atticus recently on a couple of occasions. And the last time was yesterday, and it seemed to me stronger this time, and Twyla was very active, I felt. And I think that over the few times that we've engaged that, there was a building effect. And that's probably what you were just discussing, and there is a trust that builds, we get familiar with both our energies in that kind of intimate capacity, and that allows for a stronger, clearer interaction of energy, right?
ELIAS: Yes.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: And it's the same with Twyla too, no?
ELIAS: Yes.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: I mean, the more that I engage her there's a sort of synergy that develops.
ELIAS: Yes. Yes. And how much more exciting is that than what is occurring with other individuals that you disagree with? What does that do to you? How do you FEEL when you engage that type of action?
JEAN-FRANCOIS: It's uplifting.
ELIAS: And successful.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: It's expansive, it's fun, it's exciting. It makes you curious about what else and how further can it go and what else can we do in that timeframe.
ELIAS: It is inspiring.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Yes, yes.
ELIAS: And it is empowering, and it feels good.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: It does. It does.
ELIAS: And it feels good to not be in pain. (Jean-Francois and Adam both chuckle.)
ELIAS: Now; think momentarily about all of these threats and all of what is occurring and all of this unrest. And all of it is purposeful, let me express to you. It is all part of this wave. It is all very purposeful, and all of it is expanding awareness in different capacities—not in the same manner as yourselves, but it matters not. It is placing more emphasis on the individual and how important individuals are and how strong they are; how much power one individual has. You have the same amount of power. And in that, you do not even need firearms. You can effect tremendous changes merely through energy with no external sources. That is genuine power. That is true power.
And in that, I would express, in a manner of speaking: globally, collectively, your planet has a migraine. It is in pain. It is hurting. And how shall you participate with your planet hurting and its migraine? Shall you shoot it? Or beat it? Or scream at it? And that will likely generate the migraine to become worse. Or shall you be open and cooperate and generate that healing energy—and he is not only the healer. You all have that capacity. You are channeling your energy specifically in a healing direction very intentionally with specific individuals and specific situations, but you all incorporate that healing energy, that ability to return to natural state.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: It doesn't need to happen in the context that I'm exploring—that's what you're saying.
ELIAS: Precisely.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: It can happen naturally throughout the day in all kinds of interactions.
ELIAS: Precisely, yes.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Yes.
ELIAS: Yes.
Now, food for thought: in relation to all of this threat and your daily interaction, what you do in a day, the next time that you present to yourselves any situation or expression of another individual expressing in any capacity of anxious or pushing or forcing energy or annoyed or irritated or negative in any capacity—maybe sad, maybe confused—allow yourselves to pause momentarily and entertain the question to yourselves, "What type of energy could I be projecting in this very moment that will aid this person, that will help them to move in a direction that is more beneficial?"
And I express that specifically "more beneficial" rather than using the word "positive," for at times—and this is a matter of how aware are you of what you are participating in, in a moment—it is a puzzle. For at times another individual may be expressing in a manner that you consider to be negative, and it may be beneficial for them to do that, for they may require releasing that energy. They may be holding energy, and it may be a positive or a beneficial action for them to release that. But in that, how are you participating with them? Not necessarily dissuading them away from what they are expressing, also not echoing. But how can you express in a manner that is genuine to you, for it defeats the purpose if you are twisting yourself and convoluting yourself to be accommodating. But in a manner that is genuine to you and that acknowledges the other individual—regardless of whether you agree with them or not—that acknowledges them but also moves in a direction of choosing whether to involve or not.
Other individuals know when you are not involving yourself. And not involving yourself is not ignoring them. But they, regardless of whether they think it or not, are responsive when you are not involving yourself; for in that, they notice the difference in energy and THEY readjust themselves. You are not required to do anything or to suggest anything. They will readjust themselves, for they are not receiving what they expect. What they are receiving is what they want: to be witnessed.
Shall we break?
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Yes, thank you.
ELIAS: You are very welcome.
JEAN-FRANCOIS: I knew somehow this session would be about global—I just knew it was going to go there. (Elias laughs).
ADAM: I feel like it's not over.
ELIAS: Ah! And your atmosphere is lending to that. (Laughs)
JEAN-FRANCOIS: Yeah. What about that?
ELIAS: Very well, we shall continue shortly.
(Elias departs after 1 hour, 1 minute.)
Copyright 2015 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.