The Death of a Pet
Topics:
“The Death of a Pet”
“There Are No Absolutes”
“The Challenge of Simplicity”
Saturday, January 13, 2001 (Private/Phone)
Participants: Mary (Michael) and Liz.
Elias arrives at 3:16 PM. (Arrival time is 20 seconds)
ELIAS: Good afternoon!
LIZ: Hello, Elias! It’s good to talk to you!
ELIAS: Ha ha! And how shall we proceed this day?
LIZ: I lost a cat that was very special to me over New Year’s,
and I have some questions about that.
ELIAS: Very well.
LIZ: I have several cats, but this one was very, very special.
I guess I knew that when it was time for him to go, that it was going to
be very painful. I had recognized that for several years, and I suppose
I created it being very painful just because it was more fun to do that
... I don’t know. (Elias chuckles) But he was not really an old cat.
He was kind of middle-aged, and I’m curious why he chose that time to do
it, to die. Would you have any idea?
ELIAS: I may express to you that this action was a cooperation
between yourself and this creature, for it matters not that the creature
was not creating what you term to be a lifetime which incorporates old
age, so to speak.
The creature has created movement throughout its focus in conjunction
with you and the movement that you have created.
Therefore, in the recognition of your movement, incorporating what you
term to be “timing” in physical focus, there was a recognition that this
type of choice would be impactful within your focus and would offer energy
and facilitate movement within you, allowing you to offer a new understanding
of information that you have been assimilating in recent time frameworks.
LIZ: I see. I kind of guessed that, I guess. If I
had consciously choreographed the whole scenario that I went through with
his death, I couldn’t have done it any tighter than it worked out. (Laughing)
ELIAS: Ha ha!
In this, you may be acknowledging of yourself that you have allowed
yourself an objective awareness of your own creations, of your own participation
in this scenario, and of your objective understanding of the concepts that
you have presented to yourself.
This has been, in a manner of speaking, an offering of energy to you
from this creature, in allowing you a type of participation that shall
move your awareness objectively into more of a genuine expression of reality
rather than merely concepts.
LIZ: Well, that was certainly ... yeah. There was an awful
lot of imagery that went with his passing, and as he became ill, at first
I thought he had diabetes and I took him to the vet. I decided that
I would honor my beliefs that the vet could do no wrong, but the things
he displayed to her were very, very different from what I saw. She
would put him on the table and say, “Oh, he’s getting so much better.
He can walk now, he can find the cat box, he can see again, he is no longer
blind,” and I’d get him home and he wasn’t anything like that. And
I finally realized that it was very possible for us to be seeing this ...
genuinely seeing this display in our own realities with the same cat.
ELIAS: Quite, and in that, the creature creates its reality in
cooperation and in relation to the expectation of each of the individuals
that it is interacting with.
LIZ: So part of this ... I had a fear when this first started
that he was dying, and I decided that I was going to ignore that.
So my perception that this animal was in the act of dying actually helped
to create that.
ELIAS: No, not in those terms. You are viewing this situation
in terms [that are] in alignment with familiar beliefs that you hold.
In this, you create a viewing of the scenario in conjunction with those
beliefs, expressing to yourself that you have created a perception or a
direction of thought, and in that, you assess within yourself that therefore
you have created that action in coming to fruition. But in that identification
and thought process, you are reinforcing aspects of judgment and discounting
of yourself.
For in actuality, what you have created is a relationship with this
creature for a time framework, and within that relationship with this creature,
the creature also is creating and expressing its reality.
Now; it is no accident that you have drawn this particular creature
to yourself and created the type of relationship with this creature that
you have held, for this creature created its reality in this physical focus
quite in conjunction and in cooperation with you.
Therefore, you are not responsible for the choices of the creature,
and you are not dictating to the creature what its choices shall be.
But in cooperation with your movement and your energy, in a manner of speaking,
the intent of the creature was to mirror certain expressions to you, and
also to move in its own creations and choices in a manner that would be
in harmony and in cooperation with whatever you chose to be addressing
to in a particular time framework.
The creature does not hold the beliefs that you hold. Therefore,
the choices that are engaged by the creature are neutral. They are
chosen knowing that they shall be enacted in the most perfect alignment
with its intent, which was to be facilitating energy with your choice of
your movement. This particular creature has created a very efficient
and perfect harmony with your movement.
In this, in recognizing the desire that you hold in this time framework
to objectively understand certain aspects of information that you have
provided to yourself, and knowing that the genuine objective assimilation
of some of these concepts shall be greatly influencing of your movement
in creating more of an ease in how you create your reality, the creature,
in perfect harmony to that recognition of your movement and your choices,
engaged a choice to be creating an action that would be helpful to you,
in a manner of speaking, in allowing you to move into an expression of
actual physical participation, which also allowed you more of an objective
understanding of what you are engaging within self. Are you understanding?
LIZ: Sort of. Yeah, sort of.
ELIAS: You have chosen to be examining self. You have chosen
to be assimilating information that you have offered to yourself, concepts
that you have presented to yourself, and in that choice, there is an underlying
strength in desire to be not merely assimilating that information subjectively,
but holding an objective understanding of it that shall allow you to apply
this in genuineness within your focus, knowing that this shall be creating
a greater expression of freedom that you shall allow within self, and that
freedom is expressed in becoming familiar with yourself and how you create
your reality, and the recognition of your choices and those areas within
you that you deny your choices.
In this action, in this choice of this creature, it has expressed an
energy to draw you into participation with it, and in that participation
has offered you an expression of energy which you have received, and now
shall allow yourself to draw upon that energy and that experience to allow
yourself more of an objective understanding of how you individually create
your reality, and become much more familiar with you.
LIZ: I see. All the time this was going on, I had a feeling
that there was something rather profound happening and I should be paying
attention. I kept feeling that there was mirroring going on, but
I wasn’t able to really understand what the mirroring was about when the
cat became blind. Through the whole time framework, I was having
trouble seeing. My glasses would get dirty, my windshield would get
dirty, my monitor would get dirty — everything was pointing to having trouble
seeing. Was I mirroring the cat or was the cat mirroring me, or what
was going on with some of the imagery that was....
ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, the creature expressed a mirroring
to you of what you were engaging.
You offered yourself communications to yourself through your visual
sense, and in this, your expression to yourself or the communication that
you were offering to yourself was an identification of being clouded to
an extent, and not genuinely holding a clarity in understanding some of
the information that you had been providing to yourself through different
avenues, and your assessment that you were engaging different concepts,
but not quite objectively holding a clarity in your understanding of them
or how they may be related in what you view as practical terms and application.
Therefore, in cooperation with you, the creature displayed to you that
particular manifestation, although as I have stated, the creature also
chose to merely be creating that manifestation in relation to you.
This you may view as perfect harmony of this creature’s choices and
manifestations in relation to what you engage and create.
This is not to say that you have dictated this to the creature, for
be remembering that the creature’s intent was to be in perfect harmony
with you and your movement, and therefore expressing a reflection continuously
to you through its own physical expressions.
But in relation to other individuals or when not interacting with you
physically, its choices of how it created its manifestation altered.
LIZ: Okay. That’s fascinating.
ELIAS: This also holds information for you in itself, for it provides
you with the opportunity to view the expression of choice and the recognition
of the reality that there are no absolutes.
For the creature, without the influence of belief systems, allowed itself
to move in different physical manifestations and choices and alter its
reality in different moments in what may objectively appear as an impossibility.
For in terms of absolutes, the creature shall either be expressing blindness
or not, but it shall not express both — that it shall be creating blindness
in one moment, and seeing in another moment, and blindness again in another
moment. This appears to be inconsistent within your beliefs, for
your beliefs express absolutes.
LIZ: True, yeah.
ELIAS: Therefore, in perfect harmony in its expression of energy
with you and your desire to be objectively understanding and viewing these
concepts — one of which is that of no absolutes — the creature expressed
physical manifestations to you as an example, providing you with physical
objective imagery that shall be helpful to your understanding.
LIZ: Wow. One of the other things that I’ve been getting
a lot of imagery for lately is, I call it slow down imagery. It seems
like I keep delaying myself or slowing down. I get behind slow cars,
I get behind people, and I also don’t move. What am I doing with
that? (Elias chuckles) It’s certainly frustrating! (Laughing)
ELIAS: (Chuckling) It is frustrating, for it is unfamiliar.
LIZ: Yeah.
ELIAS: And in this, what you are expressing to yourself in this
exhibition of imagery is that your desire is to be incorporating time framework
to be paying attention to you and to be becoming more familiar with you
and all of the manners in which you communicate to yourself, becoming familiar
with all of your own expressions.
In this, you create a slowing in objective imagery in which you prevent
yourself from moving ahead, in symbolic terms, quickly, and therefore you
hold yourself in moments that provide you with this time to be noticing
you.
As you allow yourself to be paying attention, not merely to the objective
imagery in this slowing of actions, but to be noticing what you are experiencing
in these situations, you may also become much more familiar with your own
communications to yourself. For you are communicating information
to yourself in these time frameworks, but your attention moves to the imagery
and is not noticing the communications that you are offering to yourself.
Therefore, you create the signal of frustration, which is the signal
to you, in objective terms, in feeling that emotion, that you are offering
a communication to yourself — you are expressing a message to yourself
— and as you continue to not receive the message or the communication,
you continue to create the signal of frustration.
LIZ: Ah, okay. (Elias chuckles) It’s all so obvious if you
just see it! (Laughing)
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha! And quite simplistic! But once
again, you are so very fond of complication, are you not? Ha ha ha
ha!
LIZ: I am! I’ve been demonstrating that to myself with a
computer game, and I’ve discovered that I’m just instantly able to complicate
almost anything! (Laughing)
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha! As are most individuals within your
physical dimension! Ha ha ha! For this is intriguing to you!
It is exciting and it holds your attention. Therefore, you play with
complication! (Chuckling)
LIZ: I guess I was trying to figure out how to get over the fascination
with it! (Laughing)
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha! I shall also express to you, it is quite
challenging to be allowing yourselves to view the simplicity of most of
your expressions and your motivations and your movements.
But once again, you present to yourself the redefining of terms, which
also subsequently redefines your reality.
You define simplicity as an expression lacking challenge, and also lacking
surprise. That which shall be simple shall be mundane and uninteresting
to you, for it shall provide you with no expression of challenge.
And in this, as you begin redefining your terms and turning your perception
to allow yourself to examine the genuine expression of some of these terms,
you also move into a recognition that simplicity is not synonymous with
the lack of challenge. (Chuckling)
You need not be complicating expressions or movements to be continuing
to challenge yourself in your ability to accomplish the actualization of
simplicity. (Chuckling)
I may express to you, my friend, the actualization of many expressions
in simplicity may be MORE challenging than your creation of complication!
(Chuckling)
LIZ: I’m afraid you’re probably right about that! (Laughing)
ELIAS: Ha ha ha! For this is much more unfamiliar to you,
and aspects of your reality that are unfamiliar to you ARE challenging!
LIZ: Yeah, that’s true. That’s very true! (Elias chuckles)
I was talking to Mary prior to the session about ... before I ran across
your material and the Seth material, I believed that I could think myself
out of anything, and for the most part, I could. And since then,
it doesn’t work anymore! (Laughing, and Elias chuckles)
So, I’m thinking that as we assimilate this material that you’ve given
us, our reality is not so reliable anymore. (Elias chuckles) Things
don’t work like they used to, you know? And people who have good
strong beliefs and things kinda have the advantage ‘cause they can make
things work! (Laughing)
ELIAS: Ah! And this is viewed as an advantage!
LIZ: I don’t know!
ELIAS: Let me express to you, the reason that, in your terms,
it does not work any longer for you to be creating your reality in the
same manners as which you have previously is that you are changing your
reality.
LIZ: It’s not the same reality anymore.
ELIAS: You are correct.
LIZ: Oh! Now, I hadn’t thought about that!
ELIAS: The methods that you have incorporated previously do not
fit any longer, for your reality is altered.
As you widen your awareness, you in actuality, literally are altering
your reality. This is created in a natural manner, and you move easily
into that type of alteration in harmony with the objective and subjective
so efficiently that objectively you do not recognize that you have even
altered your reality!
LIZ: I buy that!
ELIAS: But you provide yourself with evidence that you HAVE altered
your reality, for your previous methods do not work! (Liz laughs and Elias
chuckles)
LIZ: Yeah, and you know, ever since you said that nothing is broken,
I’ve broken things!
ELIAS: HA HA HA HA! In the attempt to rebel and reinforce
to yourself, “No, no, no, Elias! I am comfortable with my previous
reality and the expression of absolutes, and I shall create imagery to
myself of broken, broken, broken, and reinforce my belief in tried and
true familiar expressions of reality!” HA HA!
And I may express to you, you may continue to be creating this imagery
of breaking elements within your reality, and you shall also continue to
present yourself with the exhibition of no absolutes! HA HA HA HA!
LIZ: (Cracking up) That’s very comforting!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha!
LIZ: The other thing I’ve got a problem with is that ever since
I read that physical objects can disappear and just leave our reality,
I’ve got a growing list of things that are gone, and they don’t seem to
want to come back! (Laughing)
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha! NOW your challenge lies in the simplicity
of knowing that these things, so to speak, have not disappeared, in a manner
of speaking, but that YOU have removed them from your objective reality
temporarily.
LIZ: Well, I’ll tell you what — the list is getting longer!
ELIAS: HA HA HA HA HA!
LIZ: They’ve gotta be cluttering up somebody’s reality somewhere!
ELIAS: Yours! (Chuckling, and Liz cracks up)
This would be YOUR reality that they may be cluttering in other expressions
in probable realities. Ha ha ha ha! And as you continue to
express that they are creating this action themselves and that YOU are
not creating this action, you shall continue to create this action to provide
yourself with your point! (Laughing)
LIZ: Well, that’s comforting too! Geez! (They both laugh)
I do have a question about ... when the cat was sick before it died,
I had a little session with my garage door. I had come home — I’ve
got an automatic garage door — and the darn thing went up and down like
five times in an hour. It went up by itself and I put it back down,
and it would go back up and I would put it back down. My first thought
was, some kid somewhere got a toy for Christmas, and it’s on the same frequency
as my garage door. (Elias chuckles) Then I think I realized that
I was doing that, and that there was some expression of energy possibly
— I was pretty exasperated at the time — that was being expressed through
my garage door opener. (Laughing, and Elias chuckles) And once I
figured that out, it stayed down for quite a while. But the other
night, it had gone up at some time — I didn’t hear it go up at that point
— and I’m curious. Why am I opening my garage door? What am
I telling myself?
ELIAS: (Chuckling) You are expressing the same message in
many different types of imagery. You are, in effect, wrestling with
yourself in this concept of no absolutes, and providing yourself with objective
imagery that appears to you as irrational and at times impossible.
LIZ: Well, irrational is certainly ... if I was gonna do it consciously,
I would rather do something that was less trouble than opening the garage
door in 20-degree weather!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha! But this obtains your attention, does
it not?
LIZ: It’s very efficient! (Laughing)
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha! Therefore, you may be acknowledging
of yourself (Liz cracks up) that you are choosing imagery that IS efficient
and DOES gain your attention quite well! Ha ha ha ha!
LIZ: It certainly does that! (Laughing)
ELIAS: (Chuckling) I may express to you that individuals
within physical focus quite commonly create this type of movement in a
desire to be objectively assimilating and genuinely allowing themselves
an understanding of any particular concept within certain time frameworks.
In this, you, in like manner to many, many, many other individuals,
create a repetition in imagery and create expressions that repeatedly shall
gain your attention in many different manners, [which] all may be examples
of the same concept that you are providing yourself with in that time framework.
LIZ: Okay. Well, I know that Mary and I talked a little
too long and I don’t want to keep you into somebody else’s session, so
I want to wrap this up. But I want to ask, in terms of family and
alignment ... I’ve been kind of wrestling with this and trying to figure
it out for myself, and I don’t even know if I’m close. But I’m thinking
I’m belonging to Sumafi, aligned Sumari, or vice versa. Am I in there?
ELIAS: Belonging to Sumafi, you are correct; aligning with Ilda.
LIZ: Ilda, okay. I’ll have to go back and read some more
then! (They both laugh) Well, I appreciate very, very much your answers.
Thank you so much!
ELIAS: You are very welcome, my friend! (Chuckling) And
shall you allow yourself to be engaging playfulness in your movement and
exploration, and not be convoluting yourself to extreme in such seriousness?
(Humorously)
LIZ: Oh no! That’s a challenge!
ELIAS: Ah! (Laughing) And I shall provide to you an expression
of my energy in playfulness that may remind you to be not creating this
continuous expression of convolutedness in that seriousness!
LIZ: (Laughing) Okay!
ELIAS: HA HA!
LIZ: Don’t raise my garage door, though! (Laughing)
ELIAS: It is unnecessary. You are quite efficient! (Liz
cracks up) You have efficiently created this action yourself!
Rather, I may choose to be incorporating perhaps an expression of tickling
energy!
LIZ: (Laughing) That’s a deal then!
ELIAS: Which shall be a gentle reminder to you to be playful!
LIZ: I will try to do that.
ELIAS: (Laughing) Very well! I anticipate our interaction
and meeting once again within physical proximity.
LIZ: Yes! Yes, next week. (Elias chuckles) It’ll be
fun!
ELIAS: Shall we incorporate playfulness in that time framework
also?
LIZ: Oh, I hope so!
ELIAS: HA HA! (Chuckling) And simplicity!
LIZ: Yeah! Yeah, that’ll be a challenge. The simplicity
part is always a challenge!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha! Simply, simply, simply! Remind
yourself objectively, simplicity is not the lack of challenge. Ha
ha ha!
LIZ: Alright, I will do that.
ELIAS: (Laughing) To you in tremendous affection and anticipation
of our next meeting, my friend, I express lovingly, au revoir.
LIZ: Goodbye.
Elias departs at 4:05 PM.
© 2001 Vicki Pendley/Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved
Copyright 2001 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.