Providing a Mirror to Others
Topics:
“Providing a Mirror to Others”
“Emotions Are Not Responses”
Sunday, October 22, 2000-1
© 2001 (Private/Alabama)
Participants: Mary (Michael), Jan (Mona), and Ken (Connor).
Elias arrives at 4:05 p.m. (Arrival time is 20 seconds)
ELIAS: Good afternoon! (Smiling)
JAN: Good afternoon, Elias! How are you today?
ELIAS: As always! (Grinning)
JAN: As always! (Elias chuckles) We’re splitting this session,
so I only have thirty minutes, which Ken is gonna help me remember.
The first question I have is, have Ken and I had a previous focus together,
such as siblings? (Pause)
ELIAS: Yes.
JAN: Was it siblings?
ELIAS: Yes.
JAN: Yes, okay. My second question is about my friend and
counterpart, Elveta. I would like for you to talk to me as if you
were talking to her, where I could transcribe this and send it to her.
I’m very upset about what happened, but we are counterparts, and I want
to know how she’s doing, what happened, what she created; just like you’re
talking to her, if you don’t mind.
ELIAS: I may address to you. I shall address to Nadia when
she requests me to address to her.
JAN: You know she can’t.
ELIAS: I know no such thing! (Grinning) She may request,
and there are many avenues that she may engage, if she is so choosing ...
in objective manner! Therefore, if she is requesting information
and is offering questioning to me individually, I shall be quite compliant
and responsive. But it is not your responsibility to be requesting
for her.
Now; if you are requesting information with regard to yourself, I shall
be compliant in offering you information in the direction of your concerns.
Therefore, shall you restructure your questioning?
JAN: Okay. I do want to know if she’s okay, and I know you’re
gonna say, of course she’s okay.
ELIAS: You are correct. (Grinning)
JAN: But I think you know what I mean. Is she really okay
inside?
I need to know why this affected me so deeply, and still is. I’m
having a very hard time. I didn’t expect it, and she didn’t either.
Is there anything you can help me with here?
ELIAS: First of all, as you are aware, some of what I shall express
to you, you already know, and you anticipate as my response to you, in
recognizing that the reason that you are experiencing the response that
you have created is a direct expression of your beliefs. (Pause)
Within physical focus, within different groups of individuals, some
individuals, in conjunction with their individual intent in their focus,
express choices outwardly and create actions and events within their focus
outwardly, objectively, that may be viewed by other individuals, and what
they provide in this type of action is a type of mirror to many individuals,
which creates a trigger within those individuals that are viewing the reflection
of the mirror.
This moves quite in relation, as I have stated, to the individual’s
intent, in providing a type of example; not the type of example of what
should be or should not be created, but a type of example of choices —
of what you DO create, what you DO choose — and in these choices, these
certain individuals may be expressing this type of mirror and example in
what may be viewed by other individuals as extremes.
Now; these extremes, so to speak — although they are not necessarily
extremes, but as you view them to be extremes — they are created by the
individual partially for their own value fulfillment, for their own process
that they have chosen, but also partially as an engagement of other individuals,
in their actions; not in their speaking, not in their verbal communication,
but in their actions.
They engage you. They engage your energy and they engage your
attention quite strongly, for this provides you with an example, that you
may turn inwardly to yourself and view, what is the similarity of what
this individual creates and what I create?
Now; many times this may require some investigation and exploration
upon your part, for you are quite accustomed, as I have stated many times
previously, to viewing in either/or, black/white terms. You automatically
view events throughout your focuses in terms of absolutes, and in a very
singular manner.
Therefore, if an individual such as Nadia creates this choice — which
is viewed by many of you as an extreme and quite shocking, to be choosing
that which you term as incarceration — and I express to you that the individual
is creating a mirror to be reflecting to many of you and is providing an
objective example for many of you, your automatic direction is to express
to yourselves, “But I am not choosing incarceration. I shall not
choose this action. What possibly may this individual be mirroring
to me? I do not create choices in this manner.” Your choices
may be expressed objectively differently, but you may be creating similar
movements and merely expressing them differently.
Let me express to you in this moment, I have spoken several times of
another individual that creates very similar type[s] of actions [and] experiences
within their focus. This individual you may be familiar with as Yarr.
This individual creates many experiences objectively in what you view to
be extremes or quite obvious terms.
This individual creates many expressions of repetitions. This
individual provides a very clear example, in objective terms, to many,
many individuals that are belonging to the Sumafi family which create many
similar actions, but they may not be quite as obvious.
This individual also creates many expressions in his focus in relation
to the Tumold alignment — not the Tumold family in belonging to, but in
the expressions of alignment — very common expressions to this family.
This individual also creates many obvious experiences objectively projected
in relation to qualities of orientation.
Now; as I have stated, in many groups of individuals that interact with
each other objectively, many times one individual may choose, in relation
to their individual intent, to be providing groups of individuals this
type of objective imagery.
This individual expresses quite obviously and quite clearly examples
of expressions of her orientation, which are beneficial to other individuals
to be viewing and paying attention to, that you may offer yourselves information
concerning yourselves and other individuals that you interact with.
This individual expresses quite clearly and obviously the action of
choice and the movement into those choices, in a movement of creating the
beginnings of acceptance.
This individual creates interesting experiences in diverse manners,
addresses to her own challenges with the beliefs that she aligns with,
and simultaneously projects actions and choices of imagery that trigger
your viewing of your own beliefs, of your own automatic responses, of your
own expectations.
Now; this individual provides a clear example in mirroring the expression
of expectation — the expectations that she holds within self and the choice
to be projecting experiences that she has chosen outwardly, that you may
all also view your expectations of yourselves and of other individuals.
In this one action, this one event, she has provided you with many examples
of how not merely she creates expectations of herself, of other individuals,
of situations, but how all of YOU create expectations concerning how she
shall create her reality, concerning how all of the individuals that are
interactive with her shall be creating their reality in relation to her,
and your expectations of behavior and how many judgments you enter into
in these expectations.
Let me express to you, were this not to be an individual that you have
created an emotional expression with and a relationship with within this
focus — were this to be another individual that you availed yourself of
the information concerning this individual but [did] not invest any emotional
expression with — you would quite possibly hold very different expectations.
Therefore, you are also provided an opportunity to view your responsiveness
and your interaction with your emotional expressions, and how you view
the mechanism of your emotional responses.
You view emotional expressions to be responses. You shall not
create an emotion unless you are responding to some event, to some creation,
to some choice. Incorrect! Emotions are not dependent upon
an expression to be triggering of them. They are not merely responses.
They are communications.
You associate them with responses, for this is how you have channeled
your energies and how you have directed movements of your beliefs, to be
associating the experience of emotional expressions only in response to
some choice or creation. But you may be experiencing emotional communication
without being responsive to any event, and at times, you are.
At times you express to yourselves, and at times to other individuals,
“I am experiencing an emotional expression, and I know not why. No
event has triggered this. It has appeared from nowhere. It
is concerning me. It is not normal, for I must hold an explanation
for why I am creating an emotional response and to what I am responding.”
You are not responding! You are merely creating a communication through
an emotional expression.
Therefore, in this also, Nadia has provided you with information, that
you may look to yourselves in this reflection concerning emotional expressions.
They are not always responses, but you have confined them to responses
and when you shall listen to them as a response, and you shall discount
them if they are created not in response and you shall attempt to eliminate
them if they are not a response, if they are merely a communication.
As to this individual, you are correct. I shall express to you
that this individual is fine ... and I AM understanding of what you are
expressing.
Is this individual experiencing emotional trauma? No. YOU
are experiencing emotional turmoil!
JAN: Yes.
ELIAS: Is this individual experiencing fun? At times; not
entirely. Is this individual experiencing pleasure? Realistically,
in moments; not entirely. Is this individual experiencing devastation?
No. Is this individual providing themself with imagery, of which
she and I have spoken? Yes. (Pause)
Is this individual experiencing the expression of blaming Elias?
No. (Grinning, and Jan laughs)
KEN: That’s for sure!
JAN: No, she wouldn’t.
ELIAS: Are YOU experiencing the blaming of Elias at times?
JAN: Yes.
ELIAS: Yes. (Smiling)
JAN: Although I know it’s not rational.
ELIAS: It matters not!
JAN: It’s irrational.
ELIAS: And need it be rational? No! (Jan laughs)
It is an experience. It is a response. This is an opportunity
that you provide to yourself — through the reflection that this individual
has provided for you — to be looking to YOUR beliefs, and therefore identifying
the strength of these beliefs and the strength of their influence in your
automatic responses ... AND the opportunity to view how strongly these
aspects of your beliefs influence your perception and therefore create
your reality. (Emphatic pause)
Your association is misery! (Laughter) Therefore, you create an
alignment with this belief, it influences your perception, your perception
is responsive and creates misery ... within YOU, not within her!
And this is reinforced through your expression of emotional qualities,
battling thoughts, confusion, and what? Discounting of yourself,
which emphasizes the misery!
JAN: I knew you were gonna come back with, I need to look at me.
ELIAS: Quite.
JAN: But it’s an interesting mirror, because it’s brought up things
that I never would have experienced inside of me without this mirror.
ELIAS: And many times, these individuals are accomplishing this
very type of action, as it IS in alignment with their individual intents
and their expressions, and many other individuals, such as yourselves,
draw yourselves to these individuals in the knowing that they SHALL provide
you with these reflections.
This is not to say that the viewing of the reflections may not be difficult
or challenging, but just as the choices that she has provided herself with
are beneficial — for all choices are beneficial — the choice to be drawing
yourself to individuals such as this is beneficial to you also. It
provides you an avenue of great information concerning self.
JAN: (To Ken) How’s the time?
KEN: You’re doing just fine.
JAN: Do I have time for my other question?
KEN: Sure.
JAN: Okay, I don’t have a lot of time, but I want to ask you
about my trip to Nepal. I called you before I left, and you said
to not be serious, and have fun with it. I did not have fun!
I could not turn my perception. I’m not sure I’m the one who went
to Nepal! I didn’t feel like me. I didn’t act like me.
I actually got sick in Nepal at the monastery, and I was just totally miserable.
I kept saying, over and over, you can change your perception; you have
choices. I knew all this, and I could not stop. What happened
there? Any idea why I had to make myself so miserable?
ELIAS: For you are fighting with yourself.
JAN: Fighting? (Elias nods) What was I fighting? Was
it their belief system?
ELIAS: Why shall you not feel yourself, or feel as you are [not]
being yourself? (No pause for a response)
Now; in response to this, I may express to you that within this action
of this trip that you have engaged, you have battled and struggled and
created fighting with yourself, and in that action, you have partially
attempted to be removing yourself from the battle by exchanging with another
aspect of yourself, but continuing to bounce back and forth. This
provides you with a temporary feeling, so to speak, of not being quite
you, but also being aware that you ARE you.
JAN: Yeah, it’s always me, and I have the complete memory.
ELIAS: Correct.
JAN: But I was not acting like me at times.
ELIAS: Correct, and this is an interjection of exchange between
different aspects in primary position, in an attempt to remove yourself
from the situation in a weariness of battling.
JAN: I could’ve removed. I had the choice, but I didn’t
take it.
ELIAS: And this is an aspect of the battle — fighting with yourself.
“I shall overcome! I shall accomplish! I shall be accepting,
I shall be accepting, I shall be accepting! Or I shall disengage!”
JAN: I couldn’t accept it, Elias. I couldn’t. I not
only couldn’t accept, I couldn’t tolerate!
ELIAS: Quite, and this creates tremendous judgment within you.
JAN: Yeah. I didn’t like that I couldn’t tolerate.
ELIAS: You have created more of a judgment upon yourself than
you have upon that which you are judging!
JAN: It just feels like I should be beyond this. I should
be able to accept whatever they do, or at least tolerate.
ELIAS: Ah!
JAN: And I don’t know why.
ELIAS: And the more you struggle and the more you “fight against”
and the more you force energy, the more you reinforce the expression of
the judgment, for you create more judgment upon self, and what you create
inwardly, you also project outwardly.
(Intently) Acceptance of self creates a natural byproduct of acceptance
outwardly. It is not the action of acceptance of other individuals
or philosophies or actions or experiences first, and therefore you shall
reinforce yourself and validate yourself and offer yourself the ability
to be accepting of self. It is the reverse.
JAN: So there’s some part of me I’m not accepting, and I couldn’t
deal with this.
ELIAS: Correct.
JAN: And this is something I would find out on my own? Do
you have a hint?
ELIAS: Yes! (Jan and Ken laugh)
Within yourself, you are struggling with the concept of acceptance.
You are struggling with the identification and definition of acceptance,
and battling with the ideas of not eliminating, but that this is the chosen
method — be eliminating, and therefore it is of no concern. And in
this battle that you are creating within you, you also are battling with
ideas of the terms of acceptance in relation to certain expressions, certain
philosophies ... RELIGIOUS belief systems.
For you have expressed to yourself that you are beyond this. You
hold enough information. You have been providing yourself with information
for much time framework. You have enlightened yourself, and therefore
you are beyond this expression. You do not align with religious belief
systems within yourself. You are accepting of the religious belief
systems in relation to yourself. And I may express to you, no, no,
no!
You have attempted previously to eliminate the religious beliefs within
yourself, and what you have accomplished is the removal of them from your
attention, that you no longer view them. This is not to say that
they do not continue to be in quite functioning order, and that they are
not continuing to influence your perception.
As you created this trip, you presented yourself with an extreme, obvious
example in another reflection. What are you presenting to yourself,
Mona? (No pause for a response)
In every direction that you turn, you are presenting yourself with very
obvious expressions of elements within yourself that you have convinced
yourself do not exist. They are gone. You have eliminated them.
They are not a problem. You are correct — they are not a problem.
But they DO exist, and they ARE influencing.
JAN: If I could just accept that I have these beliefs....
ELIAS: They are not bad!
JAN: Okay, they’re not bad. It’s not bad to have these beliefs
... and then maybe I can quit the battle.
ELIAS: Yes.
JAN: Is this battle, all these battles going on with me right
now, is that the cause of my extreme fatigue?
ELIAS: Yes.
JAN: I am so tired. I just can’t get from day to day.
ELIAS: Quite! You are creating much of a struggle, inwardly
and outwardly, in your attention and within your energy. You are
raging battles!
JAN: And this is all like in the past six weeks. I kept
thinking, I don’t have trauma with the shift, I’m okay, and all of a sudden....
ELIAS: Ah, for you have already eliminated all of these beliefs
that are so affecting of so many other individuals!
JAN: But not me! (Laughing)
ELIAS: And as we have expressed in our yester-night, surprise,
surprise, surprise! (Laughter) They are NOT eliminated, and elimination
is not the point.
JAN: ‘Cause it’s not bad.
ELIAS: It is not bad. They are CHOICES. Your idea
of true enlightenment is to be accepting.
It matters not that you hold these beliefs. What holds significance
is how you allow these beliefs to be automatically influencing you, and
therefore eliminating your choices. You are not eliminating the beliefs,
but you are efficiently eliminating your choices, and therefore limiting
and eliminating, partially, your freedom.
JAN: Yes. It impinged on my freedom. I was trapped.
The feeling I had was trapped.
(To Ken) What time is it?
KEN: Whatever you’ve got, go ahead. Time is irrelevant!
(Laughing)
JAN: Time is important to me, though. Elias, thank you so
much!
ELIAS: You are very welcome. Allow yourself to ponder what
we have discussed.
JAN: I will. I can’t wait to get the tape. I think
I’m gonna feel a lot better.
ELIAS: Give yourself permission to express an acceptance within
self. And also, you may allow yourself permission to not be accepting
personal responsibility for other individuals. You are only responsible
for you, and this is enough! It is exhausting already!
JAN: Yes, it is exhausting already! (They all laugh) Thank
you.
ELIAS: You are very welcome.
JAN: I’ll let Ken talk now. (Elias chuckles)
KEN: I’ve been enjoying listening. I’ve been identifying.
Hello, my friend!
ELIAS: Hello, my friend!
KEN: I wasn’t gonna start off with this, but at our first phone
session, when you started laughing, I connected that with when I first
read Seth, and the Irish pickpocket, a focus of Seth. (Elias chuckles)
And when I heard him laughing, the similarity, the sound of the laugh,
the bellyness of it was so reminiscent of you laughing on the telephone.
Then I found myself in a small pub, which I took to be an Irish pub
— I was surprised at how small it was — and me and another essence
were flicking suds, ale suds, at one another, and I was aware of somebody
else that enjoyed sitting back and watching the two of us do this playing,
and I connected with Archer, and he seems to remember that we used to have
this fun game, and the setting. And I was wondering, the one that
enjoyed sitting back and observing us, was that Seth’s focus as this Irish
pickpocket, or is this you in a focus?
ELIAS: Neither. (Grinning)
KEN: Neither. (Elias chuckles) Ah, further exploration!
This was one of the most fullest experience I’ve had of being in a place
with another focus. It was so vivid, even with the scents and the
tactile ... everything! It was great!
ELIAS: And quite real!
KEN: Oh yes, really! (Laughing, and Elias chuckles) Seems
like we liked to take vacations in a little jail, being picked up for being
drunk in public and stuff.
ELIAS: And vacations within the pub also!
KEN: Oh yes!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Objective vacations!
KEN: I had fun connecting with your laughter on that one because
of this pub experience!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha!
KEN: Echoes through time. Could I get a little bit of additional
information on my essence?
ELIAS: If you are so choosing.
KEN: I am so choosing! How many ... before I mention this,
are either of these two numbers the answer to this? 439 and 34.
How many focuses do I have in this dimension? (Pause)
ELIAS: 1,439
KEN: 1,439? Wow! (Laughing)
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Experiencing quite surprise,
once again! Ha ha ha ha ha!
KEN: Yes, surprise! Of course, I enjoy surprising myself!
1,439?
ELIAS: Quite.
JAN: Yeah, I wrote it down.
KEN: Okay. I’ll have to digest that one!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha!
KEN: Sounds kind of tasty! How many of similar tone? (Laughing,
and Elias chuckles) Maybe I can get that number down!
ELIAS: Ha ha! I may express to you, you may easily investigate
312.
KEN: 312. Thank you.
ELIAS: You are very welcome.
KEN: That sounds like a smaller mountain! (Laughing)
ELIAS: This shall be occupying you and keeping you quite busy!
Ha ha ha ha!
KEN: Yeah, since I’ve only objectively connected with a few of
them! (Elias chuckles) Whoa! I’m all a-tither. Am I emotionally
focused?
ELIAS: Yes.
KEN: I had a fun time, night before last, having a temper tantrum
with myself! (Laughing)
ELIAS: Ha ha ha! This may at times be quite satisfying,
may it not? (Grinning)
KEN: It was cleansing — it really was!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha!
KEN: I enjoy my tears; it’s a cleansing experience. (Elias chuckles)
Whoa — 1,439. Okay ... that just blows me away!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha!
KEN: I was not prepared for that! Well, yes I was.
Okay, my essence color tone. Logically ... yellow, blue, crimson,
a little bit of green, bluish-green, yellow-green. But for some reason,
I’m picking up on more of a reddish, rosy-pink color. Does that have
anything to do with the new pink energy center that’s being inserted, or
what am I picking up on?
ELIAS: Ah. You are attempting to be identifying your impression
as to your signature color, and you are moving your thoughts into analyzation
of your impression through the mechanism of logic. Your impressions
are not necessarily logical! Therefore, I may offer the suggestion
to you that you not look to them to be logical, but rather, merely allow
them to be expressed, for many times they shall not appear to you to be
logical! (Chuckling)
As to your signature color, you are correct in your impression that
this moves in a hue of a pink, darker than a blush.
KEN: Mona and I are gonna have fun going through the paint chips
in the paint stores, looking for colors and the names of stuff.
ELIAS: Ah! (Grinning) And you may identify a particular
color that you resonate with, and you may express the physically focused
naming of this color to me! (Laughter, and Elias chuckles)
KEN: Okay! I have found such fun playing with myself!
Essence information for a few other people? I’m only gonna do a couple
... more than the basic four, but first the basic four — essence name,
family, alignment, and orientation for Ingomar? (Pause)
ELIAS: Essence name, Lyryn; L-Y-R-Y-N. (leer-en)
JAN: Leer-en is the way it’s pronounced? (Elias nods)
ELIAS: Essence family, Vold; alignment, Zuli; orientation, common.
KEN: Thank you.
ELIAS: You are quite welcome.
KEN: There was a little bit more — his number of focuses in this
dimension? (Pause)
ELIAS: 856.
KEN: Thank you.
ELIAS: You are quite welcome.
KEN: I’m usually more giggly and laughing than this. Okay,
that’s fine. This is a fun experience! (Elias chuckles) Similar
in tone, for Ingomar? (Pause)
ELIAS: 223.
KEN: Thank you. Only one other; a short one. For Ornah,
his essence tone color? (Pause)
ELIAS: This translates into a coral color, a shade of orange.
KEN: Okay. He’s gonna find that interesting. He has
such fun exploring his visual imagery in colors, and I’m almost image-less!
(Laughing) But that’s fun; we have fun bouncing off of each other.
(Elias chuckles, and there is a pause during which you can hear Ken rustling
through papers) I really did a great job of putting some of this
down ... oh! In my phone session, there was one thing ... I’ll start
with the one that I heard that was different.
When you gave me my essence name and the spelling of it, when I got
the tape back, it was perfectly clear that it was C-O-N-N-O-R, and Connor;
very clear on the tape. During the session, what I heard was the
pronunciation of Cannar, and the spelling of C-A-N-N-A-R. Was this
a fluctuation in essence tone, or is it possibly the naming of another
focus of my essence? (Pause)
ELIAS: Not fluctuation in tone. What you are allowing yourself
is recognition of another focus.
KEN: Oh, okay. Great! Thanks. I’ll go with that
and play with that and meet him!
ELIAS: Northern.
KEN: Hmm?
ELIAS: Look northern.
KEN: Northern?
ELIAS: Northern European.
KEN: Northern European — Nordic?
ELIAS: (Nodding) Investigate!
KEN: I shall investigate! (Elias chuckles) This was so vivid
that I know I’m gonna have fun! Thank you for that clarification,
because I wasn’t sure which of the two.
During my temper tantrum, I was insisting, “Enough of the Vold alignment
— this Ken is gonna insist upon being Sumari!” However, after my
temper tantrum, I got in touch with more of my Voldness and the cleansingness
of it. So, I shall be choosing to continue with my Voldness!
ELIAS: Ah! (Chuckling, and Ken laughs) Which is quite acceptable!
KEN: I’m finding it more and more so! (Laughing, and Elias chuckles)
A couple of real quick questions. Did I have a focus as a physician
in Egypt in about 200 BC? (Pause)
ELIAS: A type of, correct.
KEN: A type of?
ELIAS: You are correct.
KEN: Oh, okay. And one last one, was there one in India
as a Dharma priestess? (Pause)
ELIAS: Apprentice to, yes.
KEN: Okay, and this was about the time of when the Mongols were
invading India?
ELIAS: Yes.
KEN: Okay. Thank you.
ELIAS: This individual in actuality does not accomplish the finality
of priestess, but is disengaged prior to that action, but engages the action
of apprentice to.
KEN: Okay. Thank you.
ELIAS: You are very welcome.
KEN: More exploration, and you’re gonna keep me busy with those
... or I’m gonna keep myself busy with these 300 similars!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
KEN: During the course of the weekend, I’ve had some of this ...
oh, other stuff confirmed and clarified. So, that’s it.
JAN: Is our time up?
KEN: That’s it.
JAN: I just want to ask real quick if you can tell me how many
focuses I have in this dimension. (Pause)
ELIAS: 1,018.
JAN: Thank you, Elias.
ELIAS: You are quite welcome. I express to you both great
affection and encouragement.
KEN: Thank you.
ELIAS: (To Ken) Continue to be playful in the exploration
of your Voldness!
KEN: Up until a couple months ago, I didn’t realize it was quite
this easy to be connecting with some of these focuses. I thought
I had to go through all kinds of gymnastics and stuff to do it, but I’m
enjoying glimpses, and then I can take time exploring.
ELIAS: Quite! Continue with your playfulness! (Chuckling)
(To Jan) And I shall repeat to you, once again, to be engaging
FUN!
JAN: Yes, I’m trying! (Laughing)
ELIAS: And attempting to be lighthearted, and not so intensely
serious! (Grinning)
JAN: I guess it’s the Sumafi in me. (Laughing) I guess we’re
just naturally that way.
ELIAS: Ah! It is YOU!
JAN: Okay....
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
JAN: I’m gonna accept that, and it’s okay!
ELIAS: Quite! Ha ha ha! And we shall continue and
play together!
JAN: Yeah, we will play!
ELIAS: To you both this day in great affection, au revoir.
JAN: Au revoir.
KEN: Bye.
Elias departs at 5:05 p.m.
FOOTNOTES:
(1) In the following, “...and to what I am responding,”
I have switched “am I” to “I am.” Similarly, in “...and when you
shall listen to them,” I have switched “shall you” to “you shall.”
Similarly, in “...but just as the choices that she has provided herself
with are beneficial,” I have switched “with herself” to “herself with.”
Vic’s note: Interestingly, while working on this transcript,
I came across a conversation between Elveta (Nadia) and Patel that occurred
in an internet chat room on June 15, 2000. Here is an excerpt:
NADIA: Ron, please explain Patel to me. I have never “gotten”
that.
RON: Nadia, this is so weird! I don’t really have control
over the interaction of Paul. He really seems to like the internet,
tho. There have been quite a few times that he has come thru, and
this seems to be one of those times. I’m fighting it. Always
have, always will. I don’t know why, but it’s a really strange thing
for me, this dead guy thing.
NADIA: Ron: Let her rip!!! LOL!
PATEL: Greetings! Let me first inform you that there are
no dead guys. These are merely energy personalities.
NADIA: Patel, what is the most important thing that I need to
“do” right now?
PATEL: Nadia, your question is quite informative to yourself,
for as you ask this question, you know the answer. There is no should;
there is no best. You may choose for yourself what the best thing
is, for there is no best thing. There only is what you choose.
You may be concerning yourselves with things that are not known, so
to speak, but these things have no validity, for they are simply choices.
These choices do not make you a bad or good person. They are choices
that you make within your lifetime, so to speak, that you may learn from
and be making examples to yourself as this shift expands, so to speak.
You shall all be noticing the influence that you shall be having upon
yourself in the manner of how you think, so to speak, about things, and
how you react, and how you relay, and how you respond. These responses
are instant; these responses are you.
You may have been thinking of certain imagery that has confused you.
This imagery is known to you. This imagery is recognized by you.
You may not realize that you have figured it out, so to speak, but you
know that you have.
You think that we come here, so to speak, to express to you things that
you do not know. This is not the case, for we come here to remind
you of what you already know.
There have been many times that essences have inquired as to what shall
happen after the shift. To this, the response must be, what shall
happen after the shift? For there are only choices.
Your choices shall shape this shift, and your impressions shall be the
major influence. There are no absolutes. There are no bottom
lines. There is only what is.
You may be asking for advice, so to speak, within this focus, and advice
may be given. However, this advice may only be engaged if you are
within agreement. There is no perfect solution to all problems or
quandaries, for all solutions are perfect, for they are exactly what you
have chosen.
This may seem to be hedging, so to speak, but within reality, there
are no answers. There are only results, so to speak. Or, the
answers lie within your own knowing and within your own perception.
Within physical focus, there have been guidelines, so to speak, set
by you that must be followed. This is not to say that these guidelines
are absolute. It is only to say that you have set these, and many
of them are — as you would term it — set in stone.
NADIA: So here I am, having created this absolute piece of crap
reality, and I feel okay. Must be something wrong with me!
LOL!
PATEL: Nadia, your beliefs are quite strong within this area,
and there are no absolutes. You may, in a twinkling of an eye, remove
all records of “wrong doings,” so to speak. However, within your
beliefs, the fact that these records exist make it so.
NADIA: Patel, I have thought of that! Figured Y2K would
have to do it!! *S* I think that I shall play with the energy and see what
I can accomplish. Thank you!
PATEL: This may be a needing, so to speak, on your part to examine
this profession that you have chosen to employ ... or not. There
are many probabilities that may play themselves out within this situation,
and many avenues you may choose to embark upon. Any choice that you
make shall be the right, so to speak, choice, for there is only what is.
NADIA: Patel, but I realize that the damage has been done.
I made the headlines twice in our newspaper. That was what hurt me.
The end result is anticlimactic — still, if I could change the records
and exit stage left!!! LOL!
PATEL: I shall be retreating for now, as Olivia has issues with
interactions. I have great fondness for you all, and Olivia shall
be realizing this fondness as well. Until we next speak, ta!
NADIA: Ron/Patel: Great fondness for you!!!
RON: Hi guys, I’m back, like I was ever gone.
Vic’s note: That’s the excerpt. I have edited out comments
made by other people present, as it gets really hard to read. Even
in this excerpt, there are times when Patel and Nadia are responding to
each other in a “lag time,” as this is the nature of a chat room.
Still, I found it interesting, and maybe you will too! :)
© 2001 Vicki Pendley/Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved
Copyright 2000 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.