You Are HIGHLY Individualized
“You Are HIGHLY Individualized”
“Elias’ Interaction with Kids”
Wednesday, February 16, 2000-2
© 2000 (Private/Phone)
Participants: Mary (Michael), Michael (Delal), and Patricia (Susan).
Elias arrives at 3:32 PM. (Arrival time is 38 seconds)
MICHAEL: Good afternoon!
ELIAS: (Chuckling) We continue!
MICHAEL: Yes, we do. I’m here with my friend Patricia, and we have, I think, some pretty good questions today.
ELIAS: Very well. You may proceed, and I shall offer my welcome to new essence.
MICHAEL: The first question I have regards telekinesis and empathy. I had some questions, especially recently, about being able to do telekinesis from memories of during my childhood, but it seems like all of a sudden, this is a lot more probable, and I want to get your impressions, in alignment with the shift, about it.
ELIAS: You are correct that you shall be allowing yourselves all to be engaging your abilities much more freely, and allowing yourselves less restrictions or obstacles in the engagement of your inner senses and allowing this to be manifest objectively within your reality.
Many individuals hold a fascination with this type of activity, but you continue to hold very strong beliefs that block your enacting of these abilities or limit you in these types of expressions, but you all hold the ability to be participating in these types of actions and expressions quite effortlessly.
Let me also express to you, Delal, one of the obstacles that is presented in this type of movement — in allowing a natural flow of these types of abilities — is your belief that you need be concentrating objectively upon the action in intensity, and your identification of concentration is defined in thoughts.
Therefore, you believe that if you are expressing a thought process in intensity, that this is the expression of concentration, and as you increase your intensity within your thoughts, you also increase your action in your ability to be manipulating energy in the manner of movement of matter within your physical dimension.
I express to you that it is unnecessary to be creating a thought process to engage this type of activity, for your thought process is not the element of concentration, although this is what you define as concentration. In actuality, your concentration is the area of your focus of attention and how you allow yourself to move your energy or manipulate energy in conjunction with your focus of attention, and your focus of attention, which is your concentration, lies in your beliefs, not necessarily within your thoughts.
Therefore, you may allow yourself thoughts in intensity and in great repetition, and continue to create an obstacle in your manipulation of energy and not physically move objects or matter within your physical dimension, for your concentration lies in your belief, which influences your perception, which is what creates your reality.
Therefore, as you hold an underlying belief that you do not hold the ability to be creating this type of action, that is the energy that is influencing of your perception, and therefore that is what you shall actualize, not what you THINK about.
MICHAEL: It seems to me that it would be better to be closer to our moments and to live more in the present to help this ability, because then our perception of immediacy changes quite a bit.
ELIAS: You are correct. Whereas you are allowing yourself to focus your attention within the now and upon self, you also open your awareness, which is affecting of your perception, and in this, you allow yourself to be recognizing and identifying those beliefs which are influencing of your perception, and this action allows you the opportunity to be moving into acceptance of those beliefs.
It is unnecessary to be eliminating the beliefs. It is unnecessary to be changing the beliefs. It is unnecessary to be focusing upon different beliefs. All that is required to be eliminating the obstacles is to be altering your perception, as per what we have discussed within our interaction of yesterday. For what you have created objectively, physically, in actuality matters not. How you perceive what you are creating holds importance, for this is your reality.
I may present to you that you may view a blue ball and Sarah may view a green ball, and in this, the ball matters not. Your perception holds importance, and this is what is creating of your reality, and therefore also creating of your responses. For the ball is not in itself that which sparks your interaction, but as you perceive the ball to be blue and Sarah perceives the ball to be green, you may view within this point, hypothetically, how each of you shall create a scenario in action objectively concerning the perceptions, not the ball itself, for the ball itself matters not.
But you may engage each other in the attempt to be convincing each other that the ball is the color that you perceive it to be, or you may create a judgment upon the perception of the other individual, that it is different from the perception that you hold, therefore being wrong, or you may place a judgment upon yourself, and you may express doubtfulness within yourself and you may question yourself, expressing that you may be perceiving the ball incorrectly and that it may be in actuality different from what you view, which shall be discounting of yourself, devaluing of yourself and your perception and your expression, and perpetuating your lack of trust and acceptance within self, or vice versa.
In this, you may view how the object matters not. Even a scenario or a situation or an action is not in itself what holds importance. It matters not in actuality, for any action, any scenario, any object, any element that you create within your reality is quite changeable. It is not an absolute. Your perception is what holds the importance, for your perception holds the ability to be reconfiguring the construction of the energy, which creates the action or the physical object or the interaction or the scenario.
Therefore, you may view the ball, and as your perception has created this particular object, the energy of consciousness, in the expression of links of consciousness, shall align themselves and create a configuration in physical matter which shall appear to you to be a ball. But you may alter your perception within an instant, and the ball may become a chair, and it shall BE a chair, for your perception is the element that creates your reality, and it is quite real. (Pause)
MICHAEL: I think ... I trust the energy exchange. Objectively, I’m still having a tiny bit of difficulty, but I think some thought is really gonna help us out, and some trust that we’ll understand it. (Elias laughs) I see a lot where my perception and what I perceive of other people’s realities has a great impact on the way I attempt to perceive reality.
ELIAS: (Grinning) Yes, you are correct, for you perceive another individual’s reality through your perception. Therefore, your reality of another individual’s reality is different from the other individual’s reality, for it is your perception of their reality, which IS reality, for your perception is reality!
What I am expressing to you is that your idea or your belief in absolutes IS a belief. You believe that there are elements within your reality that are constants and that are absolutes, and that they are perceived by every individual within your dimension as the same, and they are not, and this is the point. Your reality, as essence, as consciousness, is HIGHLY individualized.
I have stated previously, your creation of your perception is so individualized and unique to you that it may be comparable to what you create within your physical form in fingerprints.
No other individual upon your planet holds the identical sameness in fingerprint as you, not even an identical twin which is physically focused in your physical dimension, for you create your expression of yourself, as a focus of essence, so highly individualized and unique that it is not duplicated by any other expression of consciousness in any form. And your perception, which is, once again, that element which creates your reality, is equally as individualized and unique.
Therefore, although you believe that you may view an element in physical matter in your reality such as a ball, or a structure in architecture such as a house or a bridge, or an element of your reality — a mountain, an ocean, a creature — your belief suggests to you that all other individuals shall view what you view as you gaze objectively at these same objects, and that they are absolutes. They shall continue in their existence, in your terms, from one moment in your linear time framework to the next, unchanged. This is a belief, for there are no absolutes.
Your perception creates your reality. Therefore, as you view a house, a mountain, a bridge, a creature, an ocean, a ball, YOU have created that through your perception, and although other individuals participate in this creation also and create a similar object, which therefore presents a general form that you each perceive in the construction of energy within your physical dimension, each of you shall perceive it differently. (Pause)
MICHAEL: That is really fascinating. It’s very ... it’s hard to put into words.
ELIAS: Within the expression of acceptance, this subject matter holds great importance, for as you allow yourself to recognize the individuality and the uniqueness of EVERY individual’s perception, you also begin to recognize that your perception, your reality, is slightly different from every other individual’s reality, and this lends to acceptance of other individuals, and what they create and how they create within their reality, and their perception of their reality, for you shall allow yourself to be recognizing objectively that even your perception of their reality is not their perception of their reality.
MICHAEL: I can see how my perception is more important, in that I was wondering about the difficulties of changing an object or moving an object, and how other people would perceive that. But I can see that it’s my perception, and their perception is gonna take care of it the way they need to perceive it.
ELIAS: Quite, and they may allow themselves to view this action or they may not, and this is their choice.
What holds importance is your perception and the recognition of how you create your reality, and that in actuality, your perception is highly influenced by your beliefs. And this is the area of your concentration — what you believe.
Therefore, let me express to you, you create an effortless action of breathing, and in this effortless action of breathing, it requires no thought process.
Now; let me also express to you that as you are concentrating within your thoughts upon your breathing, you alter your breath and it becomes less effortless. It becomes more labored, for you are attempting to be thinking about the action that you are naturally creating. In your belief, you move in the expression that as you allow yourself the thought, this shall be altering of your reality.
Therefore, you may express to yourself, within a moment that you may be creating difficulty, in your perception, with your breath — or what you may term to be shortness of your breath — that if you are concentrating, in your terms, within your thoughts, you shall alter what you are creating and you shall be affecting of this difficulty within your breath, and you confuse yourself and frustrate yourself, for you are not necessarily affecting of the physical creation merely by your thoughts ... but you express to yourself that you should be!
I express to you that your thoughts, in objective terms, are fleeting, and in this, you hold your attention in the direction of your thoughts quite limitedly, sporadically, momentarily. But you hold your attention and your concentration within your beliefs WITHOUT a thought process quite constantly, and therefore, that is the element which is influencing of what you create in actuality, regardless of your thoughts.
It requires no thought process to be moving one foot before the other foot and to be walking across your room, with the objective to be reaching a specific destination and accomplishing a specific action or chore. You may accomplish that action with no thought process, and quite effortlessly.
But you view that shall you choose to be manipulating energy in a different manner, and move the object in the room to you rather than move yourself to the object, that this shall be requiring of great thought and what you identify as concentration. I express to you that you may enact this expression quite effortlessly with no thought process, as you allow yourself to turn your attention in the area of your genuine concentration, which lies in your beliefs. (Pause)
As you alter your beliefs, or as you alter your attention TO your beliefs, you also alter your perception, and therefore you alter the entirety of your reality.
MICHAEL: (This was inaudible, but Elias sure thought it was funny!)
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha! (Michael and Patricia crack up)
ELIAS: (Chuckling) And the paradox continues!
MICHAEL: That’s right, but that’s a belief I can work on!
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha!
MICHAEL: Well, I have a question regarding ... actually it’s a dual question for Patricia and I. Recently I read in a transcript about invisible friends, and the boy drowning in another lifetime, and it rang true with something that’s been happening to me lately.
I’ve had a fear of choking, or actually, not of me choking, but of friends choking, and my friend Patricia here is afraid of ... or not afraid of, but has a problem with the Middle Ages (Patricia laughs), and I was wondering if they were connected at all, and if you could come up with an “invisible friends” story to help us understand it.
ELIAS: I shall express to you that you are offering yourself the opportunity to be investigating self and your responses in relation to different elements of your reality, as motivated by certain expressions within your reality that appear confusing to you.
In this, as you notice these types of imagery, you allow yourself the action of turning your attention to self.
Viewing or interacting with what you term to be non-visible friends may be more common than you realize presently, and as you continue within this shift in consciousness, in this time framework of this millennium in which you are objectifying your shift in consciousness, these types of expressions may become more frequent and more obvious to you within your reality.
You shall be noticing, more and more, not merely yourself and your recognition of these types of actions, but also of other individuals and their allowance for this type of interaction. It may not necessarily be the viewing of other essences, so to speak, or other-dimensional focuses, but you may be engaging encounters with other configurations of consciousness which occupy your very dimension which you do not allow yourselves to view.
At times, some individuals have allowed themselves to view these other expressions of consciousness within your physical dimension, but it has been to this point infrequent and uncommon, so to speak. But these encounters at times have also been documented, within your development of your photographs. You merely do not offer yourselves explanations for what you are encountering or what you are viewing.
But as you are allowing yourselves to widen your awareness and open your perception to more of your reality, much of what has been viewed within your reality previously as unusual or strange or miraculous may be becoming commonplace.
In this, I encourage you to be allowing yourselves to be interactive with self and allowing yourselves the exploration of self, to be offering yourselves information as to what you individually present to yourselves in different aspects of your experiences and your reality. Are you understanding?
MICHAEL: Yes, I believe so. I’m not certain on the methods yet, but I’m sure they’ll present themselves as necessary.
ELIAS: Ha ha ha ha ha! You may choose any method that is desirable to you, and you may implement it quite efficiently. It matters not.
I express to you, I quite purposefully speak with you in different manner than I may speak with small ones, for there are certain elements of physical reality that small ones do not focus their attention upon. They move easily in the recognition of subjective activity and they move easily through consciousness, not incorporating what you may term to be the constraints of belief systems in intensity.
But they also are what you may figuratively term to be new to their experience of physical manifestation. Therefore, their experiences may be confusing to them within moments, and their newness within the manifestation creates a difference in perspective, in a manner of speaking.
In this, you identify this difference as an element of innocence, freshness, a lack of experience.
I express that I may be approaching small ones in an expression of gentleness, recognizing that they are not experiencing a lack of experience — they are not participating in what you identify as innocence — but that the experiences of essence are so very thinly veiled within their initial throes of their manifestation. And simultaneously, their objective creation of separation is volatile, in a manner of speaking, for they are creating this element of separation for the purity of their experiences.
But they also incorporate very thin veils between their individual identity and that of the entirety of essence, that were I to be engaging interaction with them objectively in similar manner to my interaction with you, they may be experiencing intrusiveness, and they may create an interpretation of that intrusiveness to be creating trauma within their expression, and as I shall not be creating an intrusiveness with another essence, my interaction with small ones is expressly different from my interaction with yourself.
I am encouraging of you — and other individuals that you view to be adults — to be investigating of your experiences and of yourself and of essence and your expressions, for your veils are much thicker, and in this, your trust of self and your acceptance of self has been affected through your beliefs much more strongly, and it has been reinforced much more. Therefore, I may be expressing challenge to you more, in a manner of speaking, than I shall be challenging of small ones, for it is unnecessary to be challenging of small ones.
An offering of information as to an explanation of other focuses in relation to manifestations of fearfulness or uncomfortableness with small ones is merely a reminder of what they are already experiencing. You, in your experiences, are not objectively also experiencing another focus. The small one, as he enters the deep water or anticipates the deep water, is in actuality experiencing the other focus, but is not identifying it, for a thin veil has been created to ensure the individuality and identity of this individual focus. But the experience is quite real and quite objectively recognized.
Therefore, in an offering of explanation to be clarifying that element of confusion and not incorporating trauma or intrusiveness, [and] in the recognition that the small one IS objectively already experiencing the interconnectedness of the other focus, I merely direct their attention to the identification of that focus, and therefore offer a scenario that they may allow themselves to view, which I express to you they do not concentrate upon and they offer little thought process, for the interaction which occurs within the moment of the explanation offers the clarity, and therefore, subsequently they do not, in your terms, dwell upon the subject matter. They create an immediate allowance for a free flow of energy, and there is an immediate affectingness.
In communication with you or other individuals that are viewed as adults, you are not actively, objectively participating in the recognition of the affectingnesses of other focuses. This is requiring of your investigation. Therefore, I may be encouraging of you to be creating that type of action, that you may allow yourself the experience that the small one is already creating. Are you understanding?
MICHAEL: Yes, very well. Thank you.
ELIAS: Therefore, do not incorporate disappointment that I am not so easily offering stories to you as I may easily move into the offering of stories to small ones, for it is not serving you, in response to you, to be offering you these stories, for the most part. For this influences your motivation, and you subsequently turn your attention away from your own motivation to be investigating and creating this connection within self, for you shall merely accept my offering and turn your attention away.
MICHAEL: I understand. Thank you.
ELIAS: You are quite welcome.
MICHAEL: You’ve answered a lot of the other questions I have. (Elias chuckles) I guess there’s one area that I still have a little bit of confusion in, so I have one more question.
ELIAS: Very well.
MICHAEL: I’m trying to decide about my intent, which we spoke about yesterday, and in the past you’ve told me that I’m in alignment with Gramada when I’m working with computers, and that is with essence. The other arenas which I’m exploring and trying to understand are the Sumafi of essence and the Sumari of focus. I’m a little unclear on the intents aligned with those families. Could you perhaps point me in the right direction or give me some things to focus on?
ELIAS: As you are aware, the element of Sumari presents an interjection in intent in your focus in creating spontaneity, and also in not holding your attention in one particular direction continuously. This offers you the ability to freely move throughout your focus, moving your attention in many different areas and allowing yourself the expression of your individual creativity in many different manners.
ELIAS: Yes. The element of Sumafi and the intent in that family which lends to you in this focus is also in the expression of your attention, in the creation of attention with respect to detail. It matters not that you may not hold your attention for extended time frameworks upon one subject or project or activity or creation — as you engage each action, you also incorporate an attention to detail in those actions. Even within your thought process, you occupy your attention with details.
MICHAEL: Huh! I’m one hell of an aligned being!
ELIAS: HA HA HA! As are you all, and we shall celebrate that expression! (Laughing)
MICHAEL: Well, Patricia, any last questions? I guess that’s about all we have time for.
PATRICIA: No. Thank you.
ELIAS: You are quite welcome.
MICHAEL: As always, thank you.
ELIAS: I shall anticipate our continued interaction. I offer to you both this day an infusion of this energy, and you may be anticipating the manifestation in reminder to you of my energy, that I may not be what you term to be far away within any particular moment! Ha ha ha! And we shall all continue to be playful!
MICHAEL: I’ll have to remember that!
ELIAS: Ha ha! To you each this day, in loving affection, au revoir.
BOTH: Au revoir.
Elias departs at 4:28 PM.
(1) Michael is belonging to Gramada and Sumafi, and is aligned with Sumari. This was offered in session #185, 6/21/97, along with the following comment:
“Within this interaction, there is more alignment than is expressed within one family. Within physical focus, not often but at times, individuals choose to be aligning with more than one family. At times, individuals choose to be belonging to more than one family. Therefore, it is not set within stone that you may only align with one or be an aspect of one. At times, individuals change their alignment with family. This is not common within essence, but it is more common within focuses. It is not impossible within essence, although it is not generally chosen. Within a lack of decision for one alignment, essence chooses two, and you may find the harmony of those, for they are not within conflict.”
© 2000 Vicki Pendley/Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved
Copyright 2000 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.