Saturday, August 21, 1999 © 1999 (Private/Phone)
Participants:  Mary (Michael) and Letty (Castille).
Vic’s note:  As I’ve noted before, Mary has been experiencing pain in her arm, wrist, and hand from holding the telephone receiver during sessions.  I suggested to her recently that she hold the receiver with her left hand, and her automatic response was that she can’t hear out of her left ear.  But Elias can, and does in this session.
Elias arrives at 1:28 PM. (Arrival time is 18 seconds)

ELIAS:  Good morning!

LETTY:  Good morning, Elias!

ELIAS:  We meet again!

LETTY:  How are you today?  Busy, I hear!

ELIAS:  As always!

LETTY:  I told Mary that I was going to thank you as kind of like a prelude to my session, because I want to document how well I’ve done from my last session; how after almost more than two years of talking about my asthma, for the first time I paid attention to you, and I’ve seen a big shift because I’ve taken responsibility for that creation.  I’ve actually recognized that and caught myself no longer calling it an asthma attack but an asthma episode, where I have all the control, and I’ve been doing much better.  I recognize I still have it because I still need to pay attention to certain things in my life, but it’s been very pleasant and relaxing not having so many intense episodes.

ELIAS:  Very good!

LETTY:  Thank you!

ELIAS:  Thank yourself!

LETTY:  I did that too!  But yes, finally the light turned on!

ELIAS:  Ha ha ha!  I express to you, you may view through your own validation of yourself how you hold the ability to be altering your own creations quite effortlessly. (Chuckling)  I shall be acknowledging of you, Castille, in this creation!

LETTY:  Thank you.  Well, I’ll get into my questions, and the first one is my latest creation, and it is a numbness in my hands and my forearms at night.  Sometimes I think maybe I’m sleeping on top of them, but I really am not.  They’re right on top of my body, and it doesn’t happen regularly.  It’s kind of like at different intervals, and I’m not sure what this is trying to tell me.

ELIAS:  I shall express to you that this is a creation in conjunction with this wave in consciousness which is addressing to the belief system of sexuality, as you know.

In this, what you are creating is a physical symptom that is an expression of the mass belief system which moves in correlation to your physical cycle, so to speak, of female alterations in physical expression.  Individuals designate this time framework and this action as what you term to be menopause, and they designate a certain time framework of your physical focus that you shall be experiencing this cycle, so to speak, and in this, there are many, many, many expressions of symptoms that may be occurring in conjunction with mass belief systems.

Now; certain expressions of physical muscle responsiveness is also what may be termed a symptom of this particular action or cycle.

In this, you may experience tensions or numbness, so to speak, certain cramping, in a manner of speaking, of physical muscles of extremities — hands, arms, feet, legs.  These elements that you view as not your actual torso may experience certain tensions which create responsivenesses.

Now; in this, be aware that these are not necessarily all natural functions in connection with the natural physical body and chemical alterations which occur within the female expression.  Many of these experiences are expressions of mass belief systems.

Although you may not objectively hold an awareness of certain mass belief systems in conjunction with this particular cycle, it matters not, for the mass belief system holds tremendous energy, and as this wave in consciousness is occurring and addressing to these elements of the belief system, it lends energy to your individual expression, and you may be experiencing different elements within your focus that you might not necessarily experience within another time framework.

In this, your physical extremities are numbing themselves in responsiveness to this mass belief system.  They are not necessarily assuming a position of tension, but are responding in energy to be creating a type of blockage of physical sensation in one area and creating a different type of physical sensation, that which you term to be numbness, which also creates a stiffness.

Now; you create this type of imagery also for the reason that you may be offering to yourself a physical example of different areas within yourself in which you create a similar responsiveness.

What I am expressing is that at times, just as the energy which is incorporated is responsive to another energy at times, you in your expression are responsive to other individuals in the manner of altering your emotional expression, in disengaging your emotional responsiveness; in other terms, numbing your emotions to certain situations as you incorporate other individuals.

You also create an alteration in your expression in like manner to this numbness in your extremities, in turning your attention from the emotional expression into a distraction in which you may un-involve yourself.  Are you understanding?

LETTY:  Yes, very much so.

ELIAS:  Therefore, you create this physical expression with the lending of energy of this wave in consciousness to be offering yourself an example of this type of movement and this type of behavior that you create in other areas of your focus.

LETTY:  Okay, thank you so much.  Yes, I can see that relating to other parts of ... not just the physical female part.  Thank you.

ELIAS:  You are welcome.

LETTY:  Elias, I was told via messenger that my color is ochre red.  Could you tell me a little bit more about what this color ochre red signifies for me?

ELIAS:  This is a vibrational quality.  Therefore, what I am expressing in this is that you resonate in your vibrational quality to the vibrational quality of specific colors.

Be remembering that as I have expressed previously, color is a truth.  Therefore, color is incorporated into every area of consciousness, every dimension.  Every expression of consciousness, the vibrational quality of color may be incorporated into.  It is not merely relative to one particular dimension within consciousness or one area of consciousness.  Therefore, in this, your essence and this particular focus of essence resonates with this particular vibrational quality.

Now; this in some manners may be difficult to offer an explanation [of] within your translation of physical language, for this does not necessarily translate entirely into physical areas that you may objectively identify.

I may express to you that the underlying constant, so to speak, of energy which is projected to your energy field within your physical focus is this color.

Now; do not misunderstand.  If you are viewing an individual’s energy field, it may appear to be many colors.  Or, it may appear to be one color generally, with elements of other colors dispersed throughout it.  Or, it may be created with the configuration of a solidness of one color which appears to be surrounding the physical body form, and a ring of color which surrounds that color.  There are many different configurations of color that may be incorporated into the expression of an energy field, NONE of which may necessarily be this particular color that I am expressing to you that you resonate with.

Therefore, I may express to an individual that their color that they resonate with may be a specific hue of blue, and you may allow yourself the opportunity to visually view their energy field and you may not necessarily physically view blue.  You may view yellow or you may view pink.  The reason that you view these colors is that they are the colors that the individual is projecting in conjunction with their energy centers.  This is also quite influenced by what the particular individual is creating and experiencing in that moment.

Therefore, the colors that are translated in an individual’s energy field may be quite changeable from moment to moment, but the underlying color which is constant is the color that I have offered to you as the vibrational quality.

This particular vibrational quality is expressed in a particular color which is holding a resonating quality with your energy signature.  Therefore, this particular color will be in your energy field and it will be constant in its expression, regardless that you may physically view this as you are looking to an individual’s energy field.

Now; I shall also express to you that you may allow yourself to view any individual’s resonating color and your own resonating color if you are allowing yourself to be looking past or through the colors that are expressed from your energy centers.

If you look beyond or through, as I have stated, these colors which create your energy field, in a manner of speaking, you shall allow yourself to view this constant vibrational quality, which translates in your physical dimension as that particular color that you resonate with.  Are you understanding?

LETTY:  Yes.  It makes a little more sense, especially because we’re always going to different issues and stuff, and that’s where I got confused.

ELIAS:  Quite.  This is not necessarily translated in conjunction with your physical expressions.  This is similar to an energy tone.  It is a vibrational quality that you resonate with and therefore creates an underlying constant within your energy field, but is not necessarily influenced by your experiences or your choices or your actions within physical focus.  It remains a constant.

The colors which are expressed within the overall, so to speak, of your energy field are projections emanating from your energy centers and therefore creating this energy field, in a manner of speaking, which surrounds your physical body, and that is very influenced by your creations, by your experiences, by your emotional expressions, by your thought processes.

All that you create within your expression is influencing of the color configuration of your energy field within each moment.

LETTY:  Well, with that, can I ask you, what color is Leezar?

ELIAS:  One moment. (20-second pause)  This resonating color would be a hue that you identify within your physical terms as an ash gray. (12-second pause)

LETTY:  Okay.  I want to ask you about Leezar’s children, Janeau and Califa.  What is Janeau’s orientation? (Pause)

ELIAS:  Intermediate.

LETTY:  That’s what I thought.  And Califa? (Pause)

ELIAS:  Common.

LETTY:  Oh, I guessed correctly!  I have a question about Janeau.  She has a fear of being away from the family.  Is this part of her orientation and her perception of life?  It’s almost like a phobia.

ELIAS:  This is an influence of experiences and belief systems in conjunction with those experiences that she has acquired within this focus.  This is not necessarily an expression of orientation, but this also creates a conflict.

In one area, she experiences this tremendous draw to be interactive with and physically within proximity of other individuals, for this provides a sense, so to speak, of safety.  These are quite within physical terms.  But this also creates much frustration and impatience and conflict, for there is a struggling which occurs, for within her natural expression of orientation, she leans in the direction of individual expression and not necessarily incorporating the interaction of other individuals continuously.

In this, the conflict is also created in like manner to many other individuals holding this particular orientation, in [that] there is an expression of a lack of trust and acceptance of self in the individuality.  There is a distrust in the individual’s ability to be creating independently, in physical terms, of other individuals.

Within the natural expression, there is a pull in a very different direction.  In the natural movement, there is the leaning to the direction of a tremendous expression of individual creation and inward interaction, [and] not necessarily as great of an interaction outwardly.

But as I have stated, as influenced by mass expressions and belief systems, as you are aware, the mass moves in the expression of the common, and in this, the belief is to be interactive, to an extent, and to be creating outwardly.  This moves contrary to the expression of individuals of this particular orientation, but they move themselves into compliance with the mass expression.

There are also other elements which are involved in this situation, for the individual employs fearfulness in this lack of trust and acceptance of self.  There is a tremendous expression of duplicity which is being created within this particular individual.  There is also tremendous expression of self judgment.

In this, there is created a great expression of conflict also, for the natural expression of self struggles in leaning in the direction of acceptance of self and turning its attention inwardly, but the belief systems are quite strongly held and the judgment upon self is very reinforcing of the lack of acceptance, and therefore, there is also the creation of experiences which reinforce the belief system and reinforce the duplicity.

Therefore, I express to you that the individual has created a very large expression in the area of fear and has lent great energy to this creation and continues to do so, and in this creates much confusion and conflict within her focus.

LETTY:  That really explains it.  Thank you very much, Elias.

ELIAS:  You are quite welcome.

LETTY:  I have a new nephew, and I met him a couple of weeks ago and felt a great connection to him.  I was wondering, was he my son in my Egyptian focus that we’ve spoken of before? (Pause)

ELIAS:  An acquired son.

LETTY:  Oh, an acquired son.  Like somebody I adopted?

ELIAS:  In a manner of speaking, yes.

LETTY:  Okay, that makes sense.  I have three dreams I want to ask you about, and more than validation, I need to make sure that I’m interpreting them right — my messages, my imagery.  One of them, I believe, was an out-of-body experience in my dream state.  It was black and white, and I could see a thin young man with a horse or a mule, and this creature seemed to be dying, and the man was honoring this creature.  It was kind of interesting because it moved to where I believe there was — I don’t know where I got this — a prostitute being interviewed on television about this man, and when I told Cindel the story, she picked up the word “Daluth.” (Pause)

ELIAS:  And you are wishing for interpretation or validation?

LETTY:  Yes, ‘cause I don’t really feel a connection that it was me, mainly because I felt I was seeing it from afar. (Pause)

ELIAS:  I express to you, what you have offered yourself in this experience is the viewing of another aspect of another focus, but not your focus.

LETTY:  Oh, okay.

ELIAS:  What you have offered yourself the viewing of is that of an aspect of another focus of your nephew.

LETTY:  Oh, the one I just asked about?

ELIAS:  No. (Pause)

LETTY:  Oh, how interesting.

ELIAS:  Another nephew.

LETTY:  Okay.

ELIAS:  In this, you are not viewing an interaction of the primary aspect of the focus.  You are viewing another aspect of that focus within a particular moment, what you may term to be a “cross point,” so to speak.

You all create certain probabilities and certain events within your focuses that at times are creating of certain cross points, and in these, you do not necessarily create a probable self within a probable reality, but within certain moments, you create an action in which more than one aspect of self may occupy the primary position simultaneously.  Therefore, there are several actions which are occurring within one moment.

Now; let me express to you the reason why you have created this imagery, for you have created an abstract and complex type of imagery to be offering you a very specific message.

In this, you have been recently moving into a position of viewing different movements within your focus — interactions with other individuals and allowing yourself to be evaluating these interactions and your participations in them.

In this, you have also offered yourself many attempts to be accepting of other individuals’ perceptions within the moment, regardless that they may agree or disagree with your perception.

I hold an awareness that you have assimilated and assessed several discussions that you and I have engaged in this area.  In this, you have been allowing yourself to be noticing and to be incorporating certain elements of this type of action within your focus, but there is also an element of difficulty that continues in this area.  Are you following thus far?

LETTY:  Yes, I am.

ELIAS:  Very well.

Therefore, this idea, in a manner of speaking — that individuals hold different perceptions and that these perceptions create their reality and that it is real and that it may be very different as expressed by many different individuals — becomes a very abstract concept and is difficult for each of you to grasp within your understanding in physical terms.

Conceptually, you hold an understanding, but within your objective reality and the practice of your objective reality, in your creating and in your interaction with other individuals, it becomes hazy, so to speak, and it does not appear quite as clearly to you as it may within your thought process as you are viewing the idea conceptually.

What I am expressing to you is that you may find much greater ease in THINKING about this subject matter than in the actual implementation of this subject matter.

Therefore, you have offered yourself the opportunity to view an action that is created within physical focus quite commonly.

This is ONE explanation, other than the incorporation of differences within belief systems.  This is one explanation that you may offer to yourself objectively as to HOW — not necessarily why, but how — another individual creates a different perception in certain situations.

Now; you engage situations with other individuals, and you all appear objectively to be participating in the same action together, and you appear objectively to be viewing and perceiving the same scenario.  But as you exchange with each other, you find that your perceptions of the same scenario may be very different, and this confuses you.

In this, I express to you, each of you, at many different points, create[s] an action within your focus in which, as I have stated, more than one aspect of self moves into the primary aspect position simultaneously, and as this occurs, you allow your attention to drift.  As you allow your attention to drift, what you are creating is quite similar to the spin of the roulette wheel.  You allow the ball to roll, knowing that all of the aspects that are participating objectively in the primary position are all experiencing the same scenario, but they are experiencing it from different angles.

Therefore, you allow the ball to roll around the wheel and you allow it to naturally fall into one slot, and it matters not which slot you allow it to roll into.  The scenario or the circumstance is experienced by all of the aspects, and you hold an awareness of this.

Therefore, all of the aspects of you are participating in the same situation in conjunction with another individual and shall hold the ability to participate in interaction concerning that event with another individual.  You shall all hold memory of the occurrence, but each aspect is viewing from a different angle, so each aspect shall have a slightly different perception and memory of the action that has occurred.

Now; this be the reason that you offer yourself the imagery of not viewing the focus in the terms of the primary aspect of the focus but another aspect of the focus, that you may view this type of action of more than one aspect occupying the primary position within the same time framework.

You also choose not to be imaging this within yourself or one of your focuses but within another individual’s focus for the reason that within yourself and within your belief systems, you view that you hold more of an ease viewing experiences within other individuals, in evaluating those experiences and offering yourself information.  You view within yourself that it may be easier and clearer to you to be viewing another individual’s experience, and that your individual experience may appear at times to be more clouded and difficult to access.  Therefore, you choose to be imaging with another individual’s focus.

Now; I shall also express to you that this is not a common action that individuals choose within physical focus.  For the most part, general speaking, you magnate to your own focuses of essence.

You do not necessarily move in the direction of accessing other individuals’ focuses, generally speaking, although at times you may choose to move in this direction, for you hold a knowing of self and which directions your belief systems move in and what shall be the most beneficial to you within the moment.

In this, as you offer yourself this information, you also may allow yourself to objectively view in the moment that you engage other individuals and you experience within yourself great confusion and shaking of head and expressing to yourself within yourself, “How has this individual created this perception from this experience?  I hold no understanding of how this individual may be creating this type of perception and viewing what they are viewing.  They must be occupying a parallel universe, for they certainly are not occupying this universe!  For we have viewed this situation and this creation in this manner, and this individual has viewed the same scenario in an entirely different manner, one in which I do not hold understanding at all!”

LETTY:  So true!

ELIAS:  This many times is an expression of this type of action of several different aspects viewing the same scenario simultaneously from different angles, and the individual choosing one of those angles to be the primary perception, and it may be quite different.  This is not to say it is not reality, for it is!  They have merely viewed a different angle than you have viewed, but it is quite real.

I have been expressing this recently to many individuals also, for this also is an element, as I have expressed previously, of this particular wave in consciousness, which is occurring now, which tremendously addresses to perception and how you perceive.

This be the reason that I have offered information in the direction of orientation, for this is an ingredient of your perception, and this subject matter of perception is a very large element in this belief system — all of the different elements that influence your perception — and also the subject matter of absolutes, for you view many different elements within your physical dimension to be absolutes in your perception, and they are not, for each individual’s perception is different and unique and highly individualized, and I may not express this to you often enough!

This is an area that creates tremendous conflict and confusion with many individuals, for you do not allow for the differences in perceptions.  You hold an expectation of absolutes and you hold the expectation that if you are perceiving ANY THING in a particular manner, that all other individuals shall perceive it the same, and this is not the case.

Therefore, this is what you have offered to yourself in this particular imagery.

LETTY:  Well, glancing at my next question about the dream, it’s the same thing, ‘cause it had to do with glasses and seeing and wearing glasses on top of glasses and putting on other glasses.  I had this dream of these huge thick glasses that I kept showing off to people.

ELIAS:  And you are correct.

LETTY:  And I wanted them to see how I saw, and that’s exactly the same thing.  Well, that response answered my next two dreams, Elias!

ELIAS:  Ha ha ha ha!

LETTY:  They were all very close in time too, and I think because I didn’t quite pick up on the one, I had trouble with the other ones.

ELIAS:  I shall express to you that this also is quite common, that you shall image to yourself the same subject matter in many different manners until you are objectively understanding.

LETTY:  Yes, and I do that a lot to myself! (They both laugh)  Okay.  Well, actually that was it, except there was one thing I just thought of, and this is also just a validation.

I’ve created these scabs in my nose ever since my sinus surgery.  I know I create them, and then after a few weeks, they’re released.  What I actually figured out just this morning as I was writing the question was that this is imagery to myself, that as I create certain things, like my asthma or my numbness or my aches and pains, I also have the opportunity to release that, just as this is being created and being released on a ... not on a regular basis, but whenever.

ELIAS:  Correct.

LETTY:  Okay, good.  Because I had been wondering about these scabs so long, and it finally hit me this morning as I was thinking about asking you.

ELIAS:  Ha ha ha ha!  You are becoming quite proficient in this area! (Chuckling)

LETTY:  Thank you, Elias.  Yeah, your validation always ... well, I’m still working on my self trust.  That definitely helps.

ELIAS:  And you ARE accomplishing, for I shall express to you presently, within this now you have created great movement and great accomplishments in comparison to our first meeting.  Ha ha ha ha!

LETTY:  Yes, and I appreciate all of your assistance!

ELIAS:  I am quite acknowledging of you, Castille, and encouraging you in your continuation of your movement.  I also shall interject one more acknowledgment, in your recent engagements with Leezar and your trust of self and your allowance of the acceptance of him and not assuming personal responsibility.

LETTY:  Thank you!

ELIAS:  You are quite welcome, for I hold an awareness that at times you hold great difficulty in this area.

LETTY:  Yes, I do.

ELIAS:  Therefore, receive my acknowledgment in your accomplishment.  To you this day, I offer my energy and my affection.

LETTY:  And I accept it with loving arms.

ELIAS:  Very well, and I anticipate our next meeting.  To you, a very loving au revoir.

LETTY:  Au revoir, Elias.

Elias departs at 2:29 PM.

Vic’s note:  I don’t know about you guys, but I was lost during the discussion about simultaneous primary aspects.  Maybe I need to go play with a roulette wheel....

FOOTNOTES:

(1)  I have changed one word in the following sentence: “This is not necessarily an expression of orientation, but this also creates a conflict.”  The word “but” was originally stated as the word “for.”

© 1999  Vicki Pendley/Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved

---

Copyright 1999 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.