Weight, Shyness, and Mirror Actions
Topics:
“Weight, Shyness, and Mirror Actions”
Monday, February 1, 1999 © 1999 (Private/Phone)
Participants: Mary (Michael) and Bobbi (Jale).
Elias arrives at 1:42 PM. (Arrival time is 21 seconds)
ELIAS: Bon jour! (Smiling)
BOBBI: Hello, Elias! It’s nice to talk to you!
ELIAS: (Chuckling) We meet again!
BOBBI: Well, I have some questions today that I’ve been thinking
about for quite a while, and I’ve managed to confuse myself pretty well
about them, (Elias grins) and so I was hoping for your input.
My first one would be in the direction of, I’ve had an issue with my weight
for most of my life, and I’m really tired of thinking about it, and so
instead of thinking about dieting and all that stuff again, I would just
prefer to be accepting of self and accepting what I’ve created here, but
that’s not been particularly easy either. I know there’s imagery
presented in the body type that I’ve created, but I would like to know
what exactly the issue is in my case. I’ve identified many of the
beliefs I hold about it, but in accepting it and understanding it better,
I’d like to understand what exactly it is I’m accepting!
ELIAS: What you are offering yourself the opportunity to view
is an expression in objective terms of the acceptance of self, and in this,
you present yourself with an issue that you have held for much time framework.
The issue of physical form — and aligning with the mass belief systems
as to aesthetic beauty concerning physical form — is that which is creating
of the belief system, as you are aware. But within this time framework,
you are moving in the direction of the realization that in addressing to
this issue, it is not necessarily the presentment to yourself to be altering
your physical form, but rather to be accepting what you have created and
moving yourself outside of the mass belief systems.
This is an element of what you may term to be the process of accepting
aspects of belief systems, allowing yourself to move outside of the influence
of these mass belief systems and the officially accepted reality, for in
moving outside of this, you no longer allow the influence of energy for
yourself in these areas, and this allows you to be liberating of yourself
in allowing yourself to be accepting of your own creations regardless of
your choice in how you are creating them.
Let me express to you that I have recently offered information to other
individuals in very similar manner in this same subject matter.
In this, the base line of the acceptance is to be recognizing all of
the aspects of the belief system which you are involving yourself with,
and in this, as you recognize the aspects of the belief systems, not to
be placing judgment on any of the expressions, but rather to be moving
in the direction of acknowledging your own movement, your own alignment
with certain aspects of the belief systems, and recognizing that you are
much more affecting as you allow yourself to be accepting rather than forcing
energy in what you term to be “against” certain aspects of the belief system.
Let me offer you an example that I have offered to other individuals
also. If you are holding an aspect of the belief that certain elements
that may be consumed shall be creating of weightiness within your physical
form, my suggestion to you is not to be moving yourself into a thought
process of denial of that alignment with that aspect.
Such as: If you view that sausage shall be creating weight within
your physical form if you are consuming this element, addressing to this
efficiently would not be to view this aspect and express to yourself, “This
is merely an aspect of the belief system and it matters not,” for underlyingly,
you are aligning with that aspect.
Therefore, as you fight with that aspect, you merely lend energy to
its perpetuation. Therefore, if you are consuming of this sausage,
it shall be producing of weight, for this is your expectation, regardless
of what you are expressing to yourself objectively within your thought
process or within your language.
You may express to yourself and to other individuals, “I do not believe
that this holds truth, and I shall view myself in the mirror, and I shall
will myself to be holding a thin physical form,” and you shall continue
to create the physical form that you hold presently, for your underlying
expectation is not in alignment with your thought process. In this,
as you allow yourself an acceptance and not the judgment of your alignment
with certain aspects of these belief systems, they become less and less
affecting and less and less important, for you are lending less and less
energy to them.
What I am expressing to you is that each time you are concentrating
upon the issue of the weight — each time that you are moving in the direction
of attempting to be altering this situation objectively without acceptance
of self in this area — what you are accomplishing in actuality is perpetuating
the creation that you have already chosen. You are reinforcing the
aspects of the belief systems and lending energy to them. You are
also reinforcing your own expectations.
But as you allow yourself to relax your focus and your hold upon your
energy in this area, and therefore allow yourself to be accepting of your
creation without judgment — for in actuality, it matters not — subsequently
you may be altering of your physical form, or you may not be, but it shall
in reality matter not to you, for you shall be accepting of your own choices
and creations ... and you shall not be placing judgment upon yourself,
and in that, also reinforcing your own duplicity. Are you understanding?
BOBBI: Yes. So, I would guess or I would imagine then, as
I am accepting of this and issues come up, then I would just deal with
those one at a time, those beliefs, and move through it that way?
I was wondering if there was one particular belief that was ... I guess
I’m looking for the key to the whole thing. I don’t know that there
is one particular issue that I have with this that’s sort of the basis
of the whole thing. I guess that’s what I was wondering.
ELIAS: The key is what I have expressed to you. The basis
of the situation and the key to this creation is the expression of lack
of acceptance of self, in whatever you are choosing to be creating.
You are placing judgments upon your creations, and this is creating
conflict. If you are accepting of your creation, then it shall matter
not the physical appearance, for you shall be accepting of that also, in
recognition that however you choose to be physically manifesting yourself
is worthy, adequate, and glorious!
It matters not that it does not fit into the officially accepted reality
and the confines or the narrow parameters of your societal beliefs.
These are merely the perceptions en masse that are lent a tremendous amount
of energy, but I express to you that although perception may be projected
en masse and this IS creating of mass realities, they are all influenced
by individual perceptions. Let me express to you that perception
itself is highly individualized, and each of you is creating of your reality
as through your perception. In this, it is greatly influenced in
how you view yourself and if you are accepting of yourself and if you are
not accepting of yourself.
I have expressed this many times, and individuals — and yourself — continue
to not quite understand that this is the base line to all of your creations
and all of your conflicts in every area, involving every aspect of every
belief system. The key is to look to self and to allow yourself to
begin the acceptance of self in every area of your expression. In
doing this, it shall matter not, and you shall eliminate your conflict.
BOBBI: Well ... I do understand that. It’s just difficult
putting that to work sometimes.
ELIAS: Quite! This be your most difficult task, so to speak,
is to be accepting of self. Individuals are inquiring and questioning
of me continuously to be offering them a method of what you term to be
easy routes, so to speak, in accepting belief systems, but the key is to
be accepting of self FIRST, and subsequently you shall allow yourself to
also be accepting of belief systems. But this is the area of the
most conflict and the most difficulty, for this is quite unfamiliar to
you all in acceptance of self. Although you objectively offer yourselves
information and express to yourselves and to each other that you are quite
accepting of yourselves, in actuality, you are not!
BOBBI: Yes. (Elias chuckles) My second question will probably
have about the same answer! This is dealing with, again, a lifelong
issue of my shyness or quietness or whatever
it is. This is something else that I’ve thought, “Well, this is just
a matter of acceptance of self, and I want to address this and work through
it.” Of course, I’ve brought a lot of imagery to myself in that —
people actually coming forward to me and telling me how I should be dealing
with this problem. I’m trying not to see it as a problem, but they’re
telling me what my problem is and how I should fix it, and addressing to
it as if there was something wrong.
So I understand I’m drawing this to myself, but again, I’m wondering,
as I accept this ... I feel that I have sort of a natural ... I am not
a talkative person. Am I accepting that, or am I hiding out?
Is this just like another place where I’m not expressing, or using this
to hide out because of lack of acceptance of self? (Elias is smiling)
ELIAS: Let me express to you that there are some individuals within
physical focus that express themselves in this manner, in the very action
that you are speaking of. They camouflage themselves in this expression
of what you term to be shyness to be protecting themselves, so to speak,
and to allow them the excuse to not be interactive with other individuals.
Within your situation and your creation of your focus, this is not the
case. You have chosen to be expressing yourself in this manner, but
once again, you face yourself with the expression of mass belief systems
and the officially accepted reality, which you have chosen to express outside
of. Therefore, there is an automatic and immediate judgment created
en masse that your expression is unacceptable.
Each time any individual is expressing outside of the officially accepted
reality — which narrows continuously, allowing for less and less acceptance
of any expression which is viewed to be outside of the norm — but as any
individual is expressing outside of these parameters, so to speak, it is
automatically not accepted, and there is an expression projected that it
needs be altered or fixed.
You view this expression continuously in individuals that create within
their reality differences which are labeled as illness, physically or mentally.
There is a lack of acceptance en masse of these types of choices and these
expressions, and they are viewed as bad. This is a very strong expression
of duplicity. Certain behaviors are acceptable and good, and certain
behaviors are not acceptable and bad, and if you are displaying behaviors
that are bad, you need be altering of them, that you shall be in compliance
with the mass and the officially accepted reality.
I express to you to be listening to self, and allowing yourself — within
your own acceptance of self — the comfortableness of realization that your
expression is what it is and needs not be altered. It merely is your
choice of how you shall be expressing yourself within this focus.
It is not an expression of hiding, so to speak, behind false shyness.
It is merely a choice of quietness, which offers you the ability to tune
into your own listening abilities more efficiently. This is not quite
accepted and understood by many individuals within physical focus.
(Ain’t that the truth!)
Now; let me also express to you that as you become accepting of your
own expressions, you also project that outwardly within consciousness,
and other individuals begin to become more accepting of your choices also.
But as you are not necessarily accepting of your own choices, they shall
reinforce this with you and shall not be accepting of these choices either,
for you shall draw yourselves to individuals that shall reinforce your
own beliefs and issues. This provides you with the opportunity of
the mirror action, and also the opportunity to
be viewing these areas that you are creating conflict in and to be addressing
to these areas and aspects of belief systems.
BOBBI: Thank you. That is very helpful. I wanted to
make sure I was not ... hiding. I just don’t want to be hiding from
something, or reacting out of fearfulness. So, thank you. That’s
very helpful.
ELIAS: You are quite welcome.
BOBBI: I have a question about an experience I had a couple of
weeks ago. I was sort of waking up and still sort of in a sleep state,
and noticed I was having this mergence with my mother. Well, I have
been looking at my relationship with her and wanting to understand more
of my feelings in that relationship, so I was really glad that this was
occurring, but it seems like as I drew close, I was like bounced off.
Instead of some kind of a mergence occurring, I was repelled, almost like
a magnet, bouncing off like that. And so I was very surprised because
I was looking forward to this action, and tried it again in that same time
frame, and the same thing occurred.
Now at the time, I thought that maybe she was blocking that action,
but I’ve had some other dream imagery that tells me we’re probably engaging
a mirroring action, and so that makes me think that maybe it was me that
backed away in that imagery.
So anyway, I would like your input on that situation, and I was also
... I do think I have some kind of a mirroring action going on with my
mother, but I’m having a hard time identifying what is being mirrored back
to me that is making me so uncomfortable.
ELIAS: This also moves in the same direction of the subject matter
that we are addressing within this session.
In this, it is a cooperation and a joint action of repelling.
You are correct in both areas. There is an aspect of yourself that
pulls away in not entirely wishing to be viewing the mirroring that occurs
between yourself and this individual, and also, there is a repelling from
this individual in not entirely being responsive to accepting your energy,
for in the acceptance of your energy, this creates the mirror action in
reverse.
BOBBI: Hmm. That was my other question, if a mirror action
works both ways. It can be just one way, then?
ELIAS: It may be noticed and an awareness may be held by one individual,
and not necessarily by the other individual. It is quite dependent
upon what each individual is allowing themselves to be presenting themselves
with.
In this situation, there is a recognition that in acceptance of this
energy mergence, the mirror action would be manifesting itself to both
individuals, and in this situation, there is a repelling action, for there
is an unwillingness upon each individual’s part, so to speak, to be engaging
the depth of that particular type of mirror action.
You are expressing specific action of mergence. In this, the action
of mirroring shall occur within awareness to both individuals.
Now; if you are not necessarily engaging mergence, this may be a different
situation, and one individual may offer themselves information concerning
mirror actions, and the other individual may not necessarily allow themselves
an objective awareness of this same action.
But within a mergence, there is an agreement between both individuals
to be interactive, and also to be complying with each other and to be creating
of this viewing together. Therefore, the action of moving away from
this creation is expressed by both individuals.
In this, let me express to you that there are certain expressions that
that individual may be offering that you hold responses to within you.
Now, be understanding: you may not necessarily objectively respond in
words or your language to this individual as they may be expressing of
certain directions that you are not within agreement of, but regardless
of your outward expression, your response within you is that which offers
you the information of the mirror action. In those areas that you
hold a difference of opinion that may stir irritated or agitated responses
and feelings within you, those are your gauges that you are presenting
yourself, within those moments, the very mirroring that you are seeking.
In this, if you are addressing to self and questioning how you are receiving
this mirror, your own expression may be quite different, but the underlying
base expression shall be the same. It may be expressed outwardly
quite differently and this may create the confusion, for you camouflage
expressions in different disguises, but essentially, they are the same.
As I have stated, the gauge in this action is your own response as the
other individual is expressing of themselves in certain directions.
Are you understanding?
BOBBI: Yes. I think I’ll have to investigate that a bit
more before I can come up with what exactly the issue is that specifically
is so irritating. It seems like I’ve found this person to be irritating
generally for quite a while, and I’m having trouble finding specifically
what the issue is.
ELIAS: Let me express to you that you may be offering yourself
an exercise presently, temporarily, in a very simple expression.
Each time that you are engaged with this individual, be noticing each time
you twinge at any of her expressions.
Now; as you are noticing your response of your twinges at any of her
expressions, note to yourself what is being expressed; not necessarily
noticing or noting concentratedly the questioning to yourself of how or
why you are responding, but be noticing of the expression itself that is
being offered, and noting your twinging in response. As you allow
yourself to view these expressions, you begin your identification of this
mirror action.
You have created a situation that you have generalized, so to speak.
“This individual is irritating to me in general, overall manners.”
This is quite vague, so to speak, and this offers you the opportunity and
the excuse to not be addressing to self, for you may express to self, “I
am aware that there is a mirror action occurring, but it is quite so broad
that it is impossible for me to be identifying what this mirror action
entails.”
Therefore, in this, if you are allowing yourself the expression of noticing
your own response — and the subject matter or the tone or what you term
to be the attitude of the other individual — you may create your own individual
file, so to speak, within you of these expressions, and as you allow yourself
to view each of these expressions, you also shall begin to specifically
identify those areas which you are allowing to be affecting of you in this
mirror action.
What you are in actuality expressing to yourself are the very areas
that you are not accepting within yourself, for each time that you are
not accepting of another individual’s expression, what you are expressing
in actuality is a lack of acceptance and trust in self, which you are viewing
in mirror action within another individual.
BOBBI: I see. When you engage in mirror action, is that
usually with a counterpart, or is that something separate?
ELIAS: You may be engaging mirror action with counterparts quite
often, but it is not necessary. You may engage mirror action with
any individual, and with ALL individuals. It is merely the choice
that you present to yourself in the area of addressing to your own belief
systems, and your own openness to be viewing the aspects of these belief
systems.
As you allow yourself to become more and more open in this area and
to widen your awareness, you shall also allow yourself to view this mirror
action within many more individuals, for you allow yourself the feeling
of safety within this expression as you become more accepting of self.
You do not automatically move so quickly into your own expressions of duplicity,
and as you do not move so quickly into your own duplicity, you also present
yourself with more mirror actions that shall allow you to objectively view
the aspects of your belief systems that you choose to be addressing to.
BOBBI: I understand. Okay, thank you.
ELIAS: You are welcome.
BOBBI: I have another question. When
I sit quietly and ask myself a question, I get answers that I write down,
and usually it’s quite helpful. I think when I’m doing that, I’m
probably interacting with an aspect of my essence. On a couple of
occasions, there’s been a sentence or two that is like a different voice.
It doesn’t sound the same. I was wondering about that. Would
that be a different aspect of Jale, or another essence?
And also, there are times — and certain questions — that I simply don’t
get any answers. What would that be about?
ELIAS: The interaction is another aspect of you. Be remembering
that each focus holds countless aspects. There are many you’s that
comprise you within this one particular physical focus.
Therefore, what I am expressing to you is that the interaction that
you are becoming aware of is not necessarily with another focus of essence
or another aspect of essence that is not necessarily in conjunction with
this particular focus, but that this is another aspect of you that is lending
energy to you in certain qualities that you hold — that the expressed aspect
of you holds — that are latent.
Therefore, another aspect of you, which is not the main expressed aspect,
in a figurative manner of speaking, offers you expressions and lends energy
to you, that you may accomplishing more efficiently.
As to the situation of not offering yourself answers, so to speak, this
once again returns us to the key in the acceptance of self. You are
looking for what you term to be your shortcut: “I shall present myself
with imagery and questioning and I shall anticipate an answer and this
shall offer me the correct direction, and subsequently I shall move in
that direction and I shall be creating quite efficiently.”
I express to you that initially, you shall be addressing to self and
the acceptance of self, and as you practice in this area more and more,
you shall remove the blocks which are veiling your own answers to yourself.
You are creating frustration in certain areas, that you may allow yourself
to pay attention to yourself more. (Pause)
BOBBI: Okay ... okay. (Pause) I’ll have to think about that
answer! (Elias chuckles) So I guess actually it’s like ... well,
it seems like a smarter part of me that’s answering. I get those
answers.
ELIAS: Ah!
BOBBI: Or a more relaxed part of me, or something.
ELIAS: Ah!
BOBBI: Anyway, it’s quite calming.
ELIAS: Listen to your expression in this! Whichever direction
you choose to be expressing of this aspect, you are affording attributes
to it in the judgment of MORE, and you are expressing of yourself — or
that aspect of yourself that you hold your attention within objectively
— as LESS. Therefore, this be a very large element of your key, of
WHAT you are expressing and HOW you are beginning to attain your attention,
in not allowing yourself necessarily to access the information that you
choose to be accessing.
THIS is your area of blockage, that you are continuing to be placing
the judgment upon yourself that you are less than adequate in comparison
to any other aspect of self ... and you are not!
BOBBI: Well, you got me! (Laughing, and Elias chuckles)
Okay, thank you.
ELIAS: You are welcome.
BOBBI: I have another question about some imagery I’ve been getting
for quite a while, of three repeating numbers. Usually they’re even
numbers, like two, two, two, or four, four, four, or six, six, six, and
they seem to happen a lot, all over the place. Lately it’s been a
lot of two, two, two. Is there anything to that?
ELIAS: These numberings that you are offering to yourself once
again may be attributed to the particular situations that you present to
yourself within given time frameworks. Each individual within physical
focus moves into directions of offering themselves triggers, so to speak,
or gauges, or what you may term to be indicators.
Now; some individuals are not paying attention to their indicators.
Other individuals allow themselves to notice and shall become aware of
these indicators. In this, they may gain your attention — as with
yourself — in appearing in what seems to be random fashion and for no apparent
reasoning, but they are quite precise.
Now; as you offer the repeated number of 2, also look to the events
and the issues that you are presenting yourself with within the present
now. Many of the situations and the issues and the aspects of belief
systems that you offer to yourself for viewing presently also involve this
mirror action with this individual of your mother.
In this, your indicator is your number 2, for it is expressing to you
that indication that you are addressing two elements to yourself; the mirror
action; two individuals, yourself and this other individual.
As you allow yourself the presentment of other repeated numbers, you
may also look to your immediate events and your immediate attention and
the actions that are occurring within your focus within that present, and
you shall offer yourself the viewing that the same number of focused attentions
are occurring as the number that is presenting itself to you in repetition.
What I am expressing by “focused attentions” is, the area that you place
your attention to be addressing to different aspects of belief systems
or different issues within that moment.
Are you understanding?
BOBBI: Yes, I think so. That’s why two is so predominant
right now.
ELIAS: Correct.
BOBBI: Okay....
ELIAS: Many times, although not entirely — therefore, do not be
confused — but many times you offer this indicator to yourself in numerical
form as you are choosing to be addressing to that number of individuals,
which includes yourself.
Therefore, if you are presenting yourself with the number 4, you may
look to your interaction and you may view that you are attending to issues
or aspects of belief systems that involve yourself and three other individuals.
As I have stated, this is not entirely the situation, for at times you
focus this number merely on the issues that you are presenting yourself
with. But generally speaking, you have created this numerical system
with yourself to be your indicator as to your involvement with a number
of other individuals.
Presently you involve yourself with two: yourself and your mother.
At other time frameworks, you involve yourself with four: yourself and
your children and your partner. At other time frameworks, you may
be presenting yourself with dealings with six. This may involve any
combination of different individuals, and not necessarily those that you
identify as family members, although generally speaking, you do move in
this direction more often than not.
BOBBI: Okay, I understand. That’s really interesting!
I have kind of been exploring focuses and stuff,
and I was wondering, is one of the current focuses of Jale a man in India
who’s probably slightly older than I? (Pause)
ELIAS: Within this present time framework.
BOBBI: Yes.
ELIAS: Correct.
BOBBI: Okay, and I also had an impression — within this present
time framework — of a young, rather fragile-seeming Asian woman. (Pause)
ELIAS: Tibetan.
BOBBI: Pardon me?
ELIAS: Tibetan. The woman occupies the physical location
of Tibet.
BOBBI: Oh, okay. My question also about that is, as I objectively
offer myself this information about the shift and acceptance of belief
systems, is that helpful to them as well?
ELIAS: Yes. This also lends energy in consciousness, not
merely to all other individuals, but to the other focuses of essence within
this time framework, that they may also be expressing within consciousness
a lending [of] energy to this shift in consciousness.
BOBBI: That kind of sharing of information, does that occur easier
in focuses that are occupying the same time frame?
ELIAS: Not necessarily, for within the focuses that you share
within the same time framework, there are differences of individual focus
personality tone qualities. I have expressed this also recently with
another individual, which I shall offer to you presently.
As you allow yourself to be investigating of other focuses within other
time frameworks, you shall notice that for the most part, each time framework
that you allow yourself to be viewing or connecting with, you shall magnate
to one particular manifestation, one particular focus.
This is not to say that there may not be many physical focuses within
that same time framework, but generally, you shall magnate to one, and
if you are allowing yourself to be repeating this action of connecting
with that same time framework, you shall automatically magnate to that
same focus, and not necessarily be connecting with a different focus within
that particular time framework.
All of the focuses within that time framework, as with all of the focuses
in this time framework in relation to you, are all focuses of your essence,
but each time framework holds focuses that hold more similar tonal qualities
to each other.
Example: If you are hypothetically expressing that within this
time framework, your essence holds four physical manifest focuses, and
within the physical time framework pastly in another physical location,
your essence holds another four physical manifestations or focuses, each
of these four — in each focus, in each time framework — shall hold a similar
tonal quality, so to speak, as one in the other time framework.
There is a type of paralleling between these different time framework
focusings. This be the reason that you shall automatically magnate
to repeatedly viewing one particular focus of essence in each time framework,
for that shall be the focus of essence that holds the most similar tone
quality to you.
Therefore, you may magnate to one focus in another time framework, and
your Tibetan focus within this particular time framework may automatically
magnate to a different focus within that time framework.
In this, what I am expressing to you is that for the reason of the difference
in tone quality of those focuses within one time framework, you may find
that you hold more of an ease in accessing and lending energy to — that
shall not necessarily be automatically reconstructed — other focuses of
your essence within other time frameworks rather than those which are expressed
within this same time framework, for those focuses within this time framework
shall generally, although it is not a rule, but generally they shall automatically
reconstruct the energy that you are offering to them within consciousness
to be beneficial to their own intent and movement, which may not necessarily
bear resemblance to your own.
Now; within the subject of this shift in consciousness, you, in your
expressions of movement into this action, automatically lend energy to
the other focuses in this time framework also, in helpfulness to their
awareness.
This is a different action [than] that [which] occurs [with focuses]
from different time frameworks, as they are not involved in this particular
action of creating this shift in consciousness. Are you understanding?
BOBBI: Yes. I have some other questions here. Is my
friend Diane’s essence name Anna or Ann? (Pause)
ELIAS: Anita.
BOBBI: Anita! Okay, and is she Sumafi/Ilda ... aligned with
Ilda?
ELIAS: Correct.
BOBBI: Okay, thank you. Are colors
part of essence tone? I’ve been thinking about essence names, and
I see the name Jale as kind of a pinkish, orangey, yellowy color.
Is that accurate?
ELIAS: You may be associating color vibrational qualities with
the tone of essence, for this is another aspect of consciousness and another
truth within consciousness, and all truths are incorporated within essence.
Therefore, in a manner of speaking, you may be offering yourself objective
terms of color vibrational qualities in association with your essence tone
qualities, and this may offer you more of an expanse objectively in identification
of your essence.
I shall be acknowledging, yes, that the vibrational qualities of your
essence may be, in a manner of speaking, translated into those color vibrational
qualities. And you may also notice, if allowing yourself to be viewing
your energy field or allowing another individual to be viewing your energy
field, that these colors are expressed within your particular energy field
dominantly.
BOBBI: Hmm! Okay. Would that be part of, then, my
attraction to the color yellow? I love yellow!
ELIAS: Partially. As I have expressed, at times you may
be quite magnating to a particular color, as you do resonate with that
particular color. In this situation, you are correct. This
is influencing of your objective identification with this color.
BOBBI: What would be the rest of it, then?
ELIAS: These are qualities that are held and expressed through
[the] vibrational quality which is creating of that particular color.
In this, these other colors express what you may term to be qualities of
gentleness and quietness, which also are facilitating in areas of healing.
Now; I am aware that this is not your intent within your focus, but
these qualities are accessed many times with individuals that do bear that
type of intent within physical focus. You manipulate the expression
of these qualities, not necessarily in a healing aspect, but to be maneuvering,
so to speak, within your focus more efficiently, and this lends energy
to you in creating less conflict.
BOBBI: Oh! Okay, thank you. (Here, there is a 22-second
pause in which there is some static, and Bobbi’s voice is inaudible)
ELIAS: Ah! And we are experiencing your technical difficulties
once again!
BOBBI: Okay, I think that was my fault. Is this my daughter
Melissa’s final focus? (Pause)
ELIAS: Yes.
BOBBI: It is. This is not my final focus, is it? I
don’t feel that it is, but just checking!
ELIAS: No.
BOBBI: Okay. I have a question also from Kristin — Stephonee
— who is wondering about her extremely severe allergy
to dairy products ... if you could give her some information on that?
ELIAS: This also is an underlying aspect of belief system as to
what shall be acceptable and what shall not be acceptable to be consuming.
This particular expressed element of a creature is viewed to be — within
underlying aspects of belief systems with this individual — as unnatural,
and therefore unacceptable.
As you within your species hold the ability to be providing and creating
milk, so to speak, for your own species, there is an underlying aspect
of belief system that she views [as] the wrongness of incorporating milk
products of another creature to be offering to individuals of your species,
as you hold the ability within yourselves to be creating of these products
yourselves.
Therefore, it is a rebellion, which is expressed outwardly in creating
a repulsion to these particular products, which manifests in what you term
to be an allergy.
BOBBI: Well, this seems to be something that she was born with,
so would these be belief systems from another focus?
ELIAS: They are influenced by another focus, carried into this
focus, but they are also held within this focus.
Be remembering that as you are entering into physical focus, you are
not what you express to be these shiny, clean plates! These are your
religious belief systems — that are expressed — in play.
You may be holding some elements of belief systems immediately as you
are entering into physical
focus. You are not acquiring all of your belief systems as you move
through your physical focus.
You do acquire some, but you are accepting of certain belief systems
instantaneously as you choose to be manifest within this dimension, for
these are elements of the base line of creation within the reality of this
dimension.
This particular dimension is based in belief systems, and as I have
expressed previously, if you are eliminating of your belief systems in
conjunction with this particular dimension and reality, you also shall
be eliminating of this particular reality. Therefore, as you enter
into manifestation within this dimension, you automatically assume belief
systems.
Many of these belief systems are influenced by other focuses, for one
focus only is designated as the beginning focus, so to speak, although
these are quite linear terms. But even within what you designate
as the beginning focus, there are assumed automatic belief systems that
are incorporated immediately upon choosing to be manifesting within this
physical dimension.
BOBBI: Okay. Getting back to Kristin’s specific difficulty
with her allergy, she also wonders, is there anything she can do about
it in this focus?
ELIAS: Yes. Now; this may be addressed to by addressing
to the belief system — the aspects of the belief system which I have expressed
to you already — and also in conjunction with connecting to another physical
focus which holds very strong energy in opposition to the incorporation
of these particular creatures, what you term to be cattle.
In this, the individual holds another focus in which there is viewed
interaction and treatment of these particular creatures which is viewed
as unacceptable, for it is viewed by that individual as cruel. Therefore,
it is quite influencing of that individual’s belief systems, and that is
lending energy to this focus and the responses in the creation of the allergy
within this focus.
BOBBI: Okay, I see. I’ll relay that to her. Thank
you.
ELIAS: You are quite welcome.
BOBBI: I also have some game connections here, if that would be
acceptable.
ELIAS: You may proceed, and subsequently we shall be discontinuing.
BOBBI: Okay. For myself, I’d like to open a new category
of numbers; the number 7 with Sumari.
ELIAS: One point.
BOBBI: Okay. For Shynla, I have a category of prehistoric
animals; T-rex with Sumari.
ELIAS: One point.
BOBBI: Okay. For Lawrence, I have a new category of condiments,
and under the physically focused connections would be the focus of Cathy
with mustard.
ELIAS: (Chuckling) I shall express, within this present
now, acceptable ... although I shall also qualify that this is temporary!
(Still chuckling)
BOBBI: (Laughing) Temporary! Okay, thank you.
ELIAS: You are quite welcome.
BOBBI: Okay! Thank you very much, Elias. It was great
speaking to you again!
ELIAS: And I am acknowledging of your movement, and I shall be
encouraging of you and lending energy to your continuation in your investigations
and your quest. (Chuckling)
BOBBI: Thank you very much.
ELIAS: You are welcome. To you this day, I offer great affection,
and a very loving au revoir.
BOBBI: Good-bye.
Elias departs at 3:05 PM.
© 1999 Vicki Pendley/Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved
Copyright 1999 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.