The Not-So-Private Private
Topics:
“The not-so-private Private”
Tuesday, July 21, 1998 ©
1998 (Private/Phone)
Participants: Mary (Michael), Carter (Cynthia),
Vicki (Lawrence), Ron (Olivia), David (Mylo), Paul (Caroll), and Jo (Tyl).
Vic’s note: Carter hails from Kentucky, but this
“private” session was held during his visit to Castaic. Carter didn’t
have many questions, so the rest of us took advantage of the opportunity.
Hence, this not-so-private private session!
Elias arrives at 12:12 PM. (Arrival time is 15 seconds)
ELIAS: Good afternoon!
PAUL: Good morning!
CARTER: Good morning! (Laughter)
ELIAS: (Chuckling) Ah! I see we are still focused
within physical linear time frameworks!
PAUL: Quite! (Laughter, and Elias chuckles).
ELIAS: And you have inquiries this day?
CARTER: Yes. Good morning, Elias! Cynthia here.
Greetings from all focused essences from the Bluegrass State!
ELIAS: (Chuckling) And greetings to you all also!
CARTER: Thank you, Elias. I have a few questions, the first
being, if you could share, what are the essence name or names that Mordow,
Zephell and Joseph are fragmented from?
ELIAS: You are wishing for the tone of these essences which have
been fragmented. This is correct? (Pause)
JO: Yes. (Here, there is conversation about stopping the
session because we are having difficulty hearing Elias)
ELIAS: These would not be essences in conjunction with our game
and therefore would be unfamiliar tones to you in your objective awareness,
but if you are wishing for these tones in words within your language, I
may be offering of this information. Excuse momentarily. (Here,
there is a 30-second pause during which Elias goes into “access mode” and
we continue to discuss our lack of ability to hear)
The first tone for the first essence would be that of Mandell.
The second essence tone would be translated as Zee. The third tone
would be translated into your language as Astel. (No spellings given)
VICKI: Elias, we’re getting a really bad connection here.
We can barely hear what you’re saying. Maybe we need to bring Mary
back and readjust our equipment.
ELIAS: Very well, as this be your choice.
MARY: What happened? Were we having a pop-in or something?
(Here, we spend 8 minutes discussing the audio problems)
ELIAS: Continuing. And have you adjusted your equipment?
PAUL: Yes, we have! (Elias chuckles) Continuing, Carter!
CARTER: Elias, I wondered if you would share the essence name,
the essence fragmented from, and family belonging to and aligning with
for the following individuals, beginning with my wife Debra.
ELIAS: Let me inquire of you, what be the significance within
physical focus of your inquiring to the fragmentation of these individuals?
CARTER: I’m just putting together a family tree, Elias!
ELIAS: Ah, I see! Very well. Essence name, Sopier;
S-O-P-I-E-R. (so-pee-ae’) Essence family, Sumafi; alignment, Vold;
fragmentation, Zachet; Z-A-C-H-E-T. (zatch-ae’) Let me express to
you that there shall be pauses as to the fragmentation, for I shall be
accessing this information.
CARTER: The second individual is my daughter Reid.
ELIAS: Essence name, Belue; B-E-L-U-E. (bel-you’) Essence
family, Sumari; alignment, Tumold; fragmentation, Canntu; C-A-N-N-T-U.
CARTER: The third individual would be my daughter Sarah.
ELIAS: Essence name, Lydia; L-Y-D-I-A. Essence family, Sumafi;
alignment, Milumet; fragmentation, Sill; S-I-L-L.
CARTER: The next individual is my son Nathan.
ELIAS: Essence name, Norr; N-O-R-R. Essence family, Sumari;
alignment, Sumafi; fragmentation, Lexa; L-E-X-A.
CARTER: And the final individual would be my daughter Ellen.
ELIAS: Essence name, Wu-ni; W-U-hyphen-N-I. (woo-nee) Essence
family, Sumari; alignment, Tumold; fragmentation, Zai; Z-A-I. (zee)
CARTER: Thank you, Elias. My next question is in reference
to a dream. In the dream I saw two women, one that I feel is of Japanese
nationality who was ice-skating, and as I was viewing this, in a very loud,
booming voice I heard the word “grananhura.” It awakened me, and
I recorded this. Is this a focus of Cynthia in what we would term
our present time?
ELIAS: (Accessing) No. This would be a previous focus,
so to speak, that of last individual given for essence name. (Here,
the group explains this answer to Carter, as he didn’t hear it clearly)
CARTER: Shall I continue? (Laughter)
ELIAS: You may.
CARTER: Elias, would any change in the physical
proximity in which I presently reside be aiding in the movement of this
group’s agenda?
ELIAS: This would be your choice. Many individuals believe
that they may be more helpful and efficient if they are incorporating physical
proximity to each other in conjunction with this agenda. At times
this may be helpful, for within physical focus you do lean in the direction
of functioning objectively more efficiently if you hold objective communication
within physical proximity to each other. You view yourselves to be
less efficient in your movement and your affectingness if you are merely
being affecting within consciousness, which is quite amusing to us!
(Laughter)
But as I have stated, within physical focus you do hold belief systems
which are influencing of your functioning and your efficiency within your
focus. Therefore, as stated, I may express to you that this be your
choice, although you may be effectively helpful and lending energy in efficient
manners by remaining in the location that you occupy presently.
CARTER: Alright, and my final question is, is there anything that
you would like to offer that will assist me in expanding my awareness?
ELIAS: As I have stated previously with all other individuals,
presently within this time framework the focus moves in the direction very
strongly of being attentive to self and addressing to one’s individual
belief systems and moving into the direction of acceptance of self in these
belief systems, which shall be helpful in the area of accepting of belief
systems. This be the main focus, so to speak, of the movement within
consciousness in this present time framework.
In the present now, as to addressing to specific belief systems, which
I shall be addressing at our next forum within physical focus, the movement
within a consciousness wave presently is to be addressing to the belief
system and all the aspects that accompany the belief system of relationships
presently. Therefore, this particular belief system is and shall
continue to be for a time framework surfacing, so to speak, en masse with
very many individuals in their own different expressions of it.
In this, I shall address to you also to be recognizing of all of the
situations within your own focus that this particular....
CARTER: Thank you very much, Elias. I appreciate it, and
I’ll pass the mike. (A funny little grin from Elias here)
Vic’s note: What happened here is that we didn’t hear the last
three words Elias said: “that this particular.” So, it appeared that
he was finished after the word “focus.” This is because of the type
of speaker phone we were using.
JO: Elias, Tyl here. Hello! I sense that Cynthia and
Tyl have many focuses together, and I had a dream about a man who taught
me the ways of the marketplace, and I wonder if this represents a focus
of Cynthia’s?
ELIAS: Correct.
JO: And is our impression also correct that there is a focus that
Cynthia is my mother?
ELIAS: In one focus. (Here, there is a 16-second pause because
we also didn’t hear this)
Let me express to you an awareness of this process that you engage presently,
for you have not connected with the responses that I offer to you.
This “method,” so to speak, that you are engaging presently is highly inefficient.
(Referring to our speaker phone)
JO: Okay, understood. I’d like to ask about another dream impression.
Do I really have a drive-by shootist focus in the late nineteenth century,
or was this imagery to myself to not put much more energy into connecting
to my focuses during that time?
ELIAS: This would not be imagery to yourself to be not concentrating
upon different focuses and the exploration of them. It is merely
an offering to yourself of one focus in which you occupy the role, not
in that which you identify presently in your objective understanding, but
closely related in what you may now term to be gangsters. (Chuckling)
JO: What about my impressions of other focuses during that time that
were contemporaries of Mr. Wilde?
ELIAS: And what shall your inquiry be in this direction?
JO: I’d like to know if Aubrey Beardsley is a focus of Tyl’s.
ELIAS: (Accessing) No, but this individual holds a dear friend
which is a focus of Tyl.
JO: Thank you. And Vyvyan Wilde? Is he a focus of
Tyl’s? Is he the focus that you speak of?
ELIAS: No. This also would be a similar situation that the
individual holds a close relationship with another individual of which
my focus holds an awareness in that particular developmental focus.
JO: Okay, and one more dream impression. The other parts
of that dream sound ludicrous! Oscar turned into a leg of breaded
chicken with thigh, and there was a wonderful image of “look for the white
on black,” and a child’s footprints appearing in white powder on a smooth
black floor, and I’d appreciate you telling me about this.
ELIAS: The imagery that you offer to yourself as to your breaded
chicken is imagery of a severing temporarily of the focus from the communication
or the awareness of the communication of essence, and the covering with
camouflage within that particular focus. But the movement into a
new awareness which was establishing of a remembered communication of essence
and the allowance to be moving more effectively into the area of transition,
this would be the imagery that you offer to yourself of the action that
that particular focus which I held within that time framework was moving
into and experiencing. In this, the powder and the footprints are
imagery suggestive of ghost images which are presented, in a manner of
speaking, within the area of transition, which was being accessed partially
for a brief time framework nearing the disengagement of that particular
focus.
JO: The disengagement of my focus? Oh, your focus.
ELIAS: Correct.
PAUL: Elias, I have a question for you this morning. Back
in Elmira last June, you told me that I held a belonging
to the Sumari family and an alignment with Sumafi. And then in our
private session in October, I think it was #224, in an answer to a question
I had about a dream with red ball imagery, you mentioned that I offered
myself information in the context of belonging to the Sumafi family.
So my question for you is -- doing my noticing and solving this puzzle,
perhaps, of my belonging to -- do I hold a double belonging to in this
focus, or has something changed since that time?
ELIAS: No. You do not hold a belonging to and you have not
altered your family or your alignment, but your essence moves into areas
temporarily of investigation of two other essence families, moving closely
into communication and mergence with other essences belonging to these
two essence families, that being of the Sumafi and of the Milumet.
In this you allow yourself information to be filtered through to the focuses
within this particular dimension, which shall be helpful to those focuses
which hold alignments with those particular families.
This is not entirely an uncommon action within essence. This is
not to say that you shall be altering of your choice to be aligning with
or belonging to any particular essence family, but that in certain time
periods, essence moves into a mergence with these families and is experiencing
the intent of those families, that it may offer itself a clearer definition
and understanding to be translated into the physical focuses to be more
beneficial and helpful. This is dependent upon the action that the
individual focuses choose to be manifesting in alignment with their intent,
and as you move into the area of certain actions within this particular
focus physically, you also allow yourself the opportunity to draw more
upon information which is in conjunction with the intent of the Sumafi
family.
You now move physically into the objective space arrangements to be
surrounding yourself much more with individuals belonging to the Sumafi
family, and you also engage active participation objectively in the action
of this agenda in conjunction with this forum. Therefore, you allow
yourself the opportunity to be accessing more information within alignment
of the intent of the Sumafi family, allowing yourself a clearer understanding
of that intent, which is not only teaching, but the presentment of that
teaching within the least amount of distortion. Are you understanding?
PAUL: Yes, I am. Thank you. That makes perfect sense
to me in decisions that I’ve made in the last year and such. You
mention that it’s not uncommon to do this. I’m just wondering, with
other individuals with other intents in other families, that they would
make choices similar to the manner that I have in terms of drawing themselves
perhaps to an area with individuals that they are not belonging to the
same family in that intent, or even aligned with. I’m just thinking
of all of the seven billion of us physically focused presently, that within
that context this kind of action must happen frequently, drawing oneself
to other intents, and then this merging that you’re talking about, and
learning more about those intents without changing your essence tone or
belonging to a family.
ELIAS: Absolutely. You are correct in this understanding,
for this offers individuals within physical focus a clearer understanding
of the action and intents of other essence families. Many times also,
individuals shall be moving into the direction of this mergence with the
family that they themselves align with within a particular focus.
But you are, as I have stated, correct that essences commonly choose
this action of physically engaging focuses that are of different families
and then merging with those family intents to be offering themselves a
more efficient manner of engagement with these individuals. This
also offers another type of empathic action, which is filtered into the
individual focus, allowing for more efficiency in their interaction.
You shall also notice that this action shall be occurring more and more
futurely, as you move more objectively into the action of this shift in
consciousness.
PAUL: Thank you. I have another question on another topic.
You’ve delivered a lot of information on different actions such as fragmenting
and splintering of essence and focuses and such, and you’ve used two terms, aspects
and facets, and recently you’ve not used the term facets at all, I believe.
So my question is, what is the difference, in your terms, of using the
term “aspects” versus “facets” of essence?
ELIAS: Within the time period that these terms were offered, the
engagement was with these individuals of what you may express to be our
initial forum. These individuals held very little objective understanding
of many of the concepts which have been offered within this forum, and
for clarification reasons I was offering of certain terminology to be more
clearly expressive of certain concepts, and in this, separating for them
different types of actions and manifestations, that they may more clearly
understand all of the different aspects of themselves, of essence, for
these are difficult concepts. (In other words, we were clueless!)
As we move more fully into more of an awareness within this shift in
consciousness, individuals are not needing of such separation within language
for their understanding of these concepts. Therefore, it is unnecessary
for myself to be separating aspects and facets and probable selves and
splintering in these manners, but for understanding purposes previously,
it was more efficient to be offering such terminology.
Facets are those aspects of self, as you are aware, that manifest into
focuses, but all elements of essence are considered to be aspects.
This term is encompassing of all of the elements or creations or manifestations
of essence, physical and non-physical. This concept is becoming more
easily assimilated by individuals presently.
As I have expressed to you previously, this shift in consciousness escalates
now and is moving more rapidly in the area of individuals’ objective awareness.
Therefore, many concepts and clarifications that have been offered previously
are unnecessary to be offering presently or continuing for the understanding
of the forum within this present now. They have already engaged elements
of their periphery. It is unnecessary to be offering extensive explanations
to them as to the actions and abilities of self, for they have engaged
this already.
These individuals that were in attendance of previous sessions at the
onset of this forum held very little awareness objectively in these areas,
but have quite efficiently moved into an expansion of their awareness and
have opened to their periphery, which I offer my acknowledgment in this
to them all.
PAUL: So are you saying, Elias, that you will no longer use the
terminology of facets then, in the way that you did at that time, and that
you will then use the term aspects in its place?
ELIAS: Not necessarily. There are individuals which shall
present themselves in drawing themselves to this forum, and within probabilities,
at those time periods I may be returning to certain terminology for clarification
and for their understanding. But for the most part, this is unnecessary
and shall not be incorporated into our discussions, for as I have stated,
individuals drawing themselves to this forum presently have already opened
to their periphery to an extent and already hold an understanding objectively
of that which I speak. Therefore, it is unnecessary to be so very
clarifying in the terminology.
PAUL: Understood. Thank you. Another question in this
area -- it’s a question about this aspect of Dream
Walker that you’ve talked about and delivered a lot of information about.
I guess my question is -- I’ll frame it in terms of Elias -- this essence
of Elias, does it hold an aspect of Dream Walker?
ELIAS: Yes, although this essence of Elias is not a Dream Walker,
for this essence has chosen to be physically focused, and these Dream Walkers
are not choosing to be physically focused, with the exception presently
of that essence of Rose, which I have recently delivered information in
this direction that you shall be objectively and subjectively connecting
with. But this essence of Elias has chosen manifestation within physical
focus, therefore would not be classified as a Dream Walker, but does hold
that aspect, and therefore is Seer.
PAUL: Okay, I’ll mull that over some more. (To the group)
Does anyone else have questions?
VICKI: Elias, I have a couple of questions. But first, I
would like to supersede our agreement temporarily, that we won’t talk on
the telephone. Is this acceptable?
ELIAS: (Chuckling) Quite!
VICKI: For the last week, I’ve been experiencing a lot of physical
affectingness in the left shoulder and the left arm, which is very unusual
for me, and it’s lasted way longer than it should, and it’s creating a
lot of emotional and mental trauma. I haven’t been able to really
connect with what’s going on, and I wonder what information you have to
offer me about that.
ELIAS: Tsk tsk tsk, Lawrence! I hold disappointment in your
abilities to be connecting with your imagery, for you are so very accomplished
in this area, are you not? (Chuckling)
Let me express to you that this action is quite simple. Although
you do not hold physical proximity presently with Michael, your connection
and your interaction as these twins continues equally as intensely as it
has ever. Therefore, this painfulness that you experience and the
tension that accompanies this is energy that you hold within this particular
physical location, which also involves your emotional state, as you are
engaging certain aspects of empathic connection with Michael. He
is experiencing what you may term to be anxiety and emotional affectingness
in the area of our agenda presently, and you empathically allow yourself
to move into this direction also.
Now; let me also offer you another element of information, Lawrence,
that although you do not engage physically within physical location with
Michael, you continue to hold an interaction within this forum and participate
within this energy exchange. You have removed an element of your
participation, for you do not hold the physical location, and in this there
are underlying affecting belief systems that create an automatic withdrawal
in the area of some of your participation, but there are other elements
of your participation which automatically engage within the action of these
sessions and this energy exchange. This be partially the reason that
you may hold an objective awareness of some imagery or feelings or impressions
within time frameworks that this energy exchange is occurring. You
also at times hold an awareness of action which is occurring that is not
in connection with these sessions, but holds another element of energy
exchange. You exchange in this energy exchange also, as you have
an awareness of and have held an awareness of nearly from the onset of
this forum. Therefore, as Michael moves into the area of emotional
anxiety in conjunction with our forthcoming sessions, you also hold an
affectingness and emotional expressions in this same manner.
VICKI: So then would this be a simple matter of releasing that
energy and thus affecting my physical body?
ELIAS: You may move in this direction, but I shall also express
to you that you BOTH move into this expression, as you are affecting yourselves
in the manner in conjunction with issues that continue to be held presently
that have been held from the onset of this forum. Although you each
have allowed yourself much movement through many elements of this particular
issue, there are issues -- aspects of issues -- that continue within this
present now, those being certain issues that you each hold in the action
of this agenda which I have set forth. In this, regardless that you
have moved through much of this situation, which I am offering my acknowledgment
to you both in this area, I also express to you both that you may be offering
yourselves information that there continues to be held energy in these
areas, that you block certain aspects of the movement of this agenda.
VICKI: Okay. Just to run an impression by you, I had some
interesting imagery a while back that had to do with some dead birds, and
my initial impression was that one of the nine babies had croaked, and
I’m just wondering now, is there an action of fragmentation
going on with some of these babies?
ELIAS: You are correct in this impression. The children
are continuing within physical focus and are not moving in the direction
of disengagement. They continue to experience and enjoy in your terms
fine healthiness, but this essence IS moving into the direction of fragmenting
these focuses, these manifestations of these nine small ones. As
I have stated, this essence of Rose is a Dream Walker, and although it
has chosen partially to engage the action of moving into physical manifestation,
it shall be moving into this area differently than other essences, in that
each of these nine manifestations shall be fragmented, therefore returning,
so to speak, the essence of Rose to its original state of not being physically
manifest. I have begun offering information in this area of Rose
and simultaneous time which is pertaining to actions that Rose engages
and also to these nine manifestations, and I have begun offering information
in the area of fragmentation, which I shall be continuing subsequently.
But although the awareness of these young Sumafi is open to many of these
concepts, this particular action holds difficulty for individuals within
physical focus and their assimilation of the information objectively.
Therefore, we shall be moving slowly into the explanations in these areas.
VICKI: Another question about imagery: A while back I had
some imagery regarding a book, and you were inside of my head pretty strong
for a couple of days, I must say! (Elias grins) I’m wondering
now if most of that imagery had to do with the events surrounding the disengagement
of James. (Pause)
ELIAS: Partially, but this is not the main focus of this energy
direction, so to speak, for I choose at times to be engaging yourself in
a knowing that within physical focus, there are many times that your particular
focus of these twins may objectively be a little more receptive to the
engagement of my energy.
Michael moves in the direction of allowing himself to be quite receptive
to myself in conjunction with other individuals, but as you hold an awareness,
he is not always so very receptive to my interaction with himself as pertaining
to himself, or as pertaining to this agenda. Therefore, I choose
at times to be engaging you, with the understanding that you shall move
into more of a receptiveness in this area and hold much influence objectively
within physical focus in the area of engaging Michael.
Although these actions of books are your choice and they are being accomplished
within your own time frameworks and as you see fit to be accomplishing
of these actions, I shall express to you that as you move more intensely
into this action of this shift, this energy exchange creation and agreement
within physical focus shall become more common and more frequent, offering
more information to many more individuals in conjunction with this shift.
But as you each are Sumafi and hold an understanding of the least amount
of distortion, it may be quite helpful in the area of lessening the action
of trauma in this shift if you are offering information in the direction
of this energy exchange.
Also, let me offer to you that once again, although this be your choice,
I am encouraging of your encouragement in the area of helpfulness in facilitating
a connection between Tyl and Cindel in conjunction with another creative
expression.
VICKI: Okay. So partially what you’re saying is, the imagery
of the book had to do with this ongoing project that Mary and I have not
worked on for quite some time? (This is in reference to a book about
the energy exchange that Mary and I began a few years ago)
ELIAS: Correct, and also the engagement of a connection with Cindel
and Tyl.
VICKI: Okay, will do. I only have one last question, and
it has to do with some transcribing I did yesterday. You made a statement: “Why
shall you murder someone for an experience if you hold no belief system
in this area? Why shall you create the agreement?” This particular
piece of information and the information surrounding it was really confusing
to me because it almost leads one into a direction of thinking that when
this shift is accomplished, so to speak, we will no longer hold belief
systems or create experiences simply for the experience.
ELIAS: There are certain experiences that you shall discontinue
your creation of, for you have offered yourselves the experiences within
all of your other focuses which are occurring simultaneously. Therefore,
within the action of this shift and the accomplishment of this shift, it
is unnecessary to be continuing in these certain areas. Certain experiences
are very heavily influenced by your belief systems. This is not to
say that your belief systems do not influence all of your experiences within
physical focus, but the motivation for certain experiences are more heavily
influenced by your belief systems and the mass belief systems.
As I have expressed to you previously, certain belief systems en masse
hold so very much energy that they acquire a quality, so to speak, of ALMOST
becoming an entity within themselves, separate and apart, so to speak,
figuratively speaking, from yourselves within physical focus ... although
they are not separated from you.
But in this, just as you may be creating through your own energy a projection
from self in what you may term to be another entity, which creates the
belief systems or the understandings that you hold of possession, you may
also be projecting energy so very strongly into certain belief systems
en masse that these lean in the direction of taking on, so to speak, qualities
that ALMOST are creating of an entity merely by the projection of mass
energy in these belief systems, and in this area, these particular belief
systems are very affecting in your creations and very influencing in your
creations for certain experiences and the perpetuation of certain experiences
and the repetition of certain experiences, which is unnecessary.
You already hold certain experiences that you view to be negative, and
although there are no negative or positive experiences, be remembering
that within physical focus you DO create a reality that is expressive of
positive and negative.
DAVID: Can I ask one question? Elias, I have one question.
For the last couple of months I’ve been experiencing a lot of undercurrented
feelings of movement and changes, within myself, in location,
in my work, with people around me. It’s been like a domino effect.
I’m also having a lot of dream imagery of returning to England. It’s
in my dreams constantly, every day. I’m kind of confused where this
is leading me to.
ELIAS: You are offering yourself imagery presently of tremendous
movement that is occurring en masse, and also with yourself individually.
Imagery of movement in changing physical locations is suggestive of powerful
movement in the area of subjectivity. Each time individuals offer
themselves the objective imagery of actual physical movement of location,
they are also offering themselves the imagery of much movement that they
are accomplishing subjectively, simultaneously.
The draw that you hold to your return, so to speak, to this country
of England is a movement in the direction of an inner knowing, which you
are connecting to, which is in conjunction to your parent. This is
not to say that it is necessary for you to be creating of an actual physical
move to this location or that you need be engaging physical movement temporarily
to this location, although you may be choosing to engage that action.
All of these elements shall be your choice, but what you are connecting
to in this particular area is a probability that has been set in motion,
and has not been chosen to be altered yet within this present now, of a
tremendous affectingness in the area of your parent and your draw to be
supportive to this individual. Therefore, you image this in the draw
to be moving to this physical location.
I may also express to you that within your movement yourself, you are
allowing yourself much more openness within consciousness objectively and
subjectively, and you are allowing yourself much more movement into the
action of this pyramid and your connection with those other points involved.
This creates another element of movement which you shall be objectively
imaging to yourself. There are many directions of movement that are
occurring presently with each of these points. They are each, yourself
also, creating of certain movements which are very significant in addressing
to individual belief systems and also mass belief systems in conjunction
with those individual belief systems, and in this movement, much energy
is being lent within consciousness to the easement of addressing to these
same belief systems en masse. I have expressed many times that your
movement shall be quite affecting in consciousness subjectively, and the
energy projected through the pyramid in their addressing to issues and
mass belief systems is funneling presently into a directedness of certain
belief systems and offering almost pinpointed energy in the direction of
mass belief systems, to be helpful in this area.
DAVID: I find myself moving closer to Castaic. I mean, I
get a feeling that this next move is only temporary, and there’s going
to be another move even closer still after that. Is this correct?
ELIAS: You are, as I have stated, offering yourself objective
imagery as to your movement closer into the action of the mergence of the
pyramid and identifying yourself more fully in your connection and interaction
in this area and allowing yourself to move closer into the awareness of
the affectingness of this pyramid.
Let me express to you that each of the points of this pyramid have offered
themselves time frameworks of physical proximity within location which
has served to be helpful to you all, to you each, in establishing more
of an understanding and powerfulness within your actions and interaction
with each other in conjunction to this pyramid.
DAVID: Thank you very much.
ELIAS: You are quite welcome.
I shall be expressing to you a disengagement of this session for this
day, for although Michael chooses not to be attentive to certain physical
aspects of this energy exchange, I am not choosing to be intrusive in this
energy exchange, and although he creates his choice to be engaging this
action, I may also be choosing to disengage, as not being taxing upon this
physical form.
Therefore, I shall be offering my acknowledgment to you each and also
my affection to you all, this day and always, and my encouragement to you
to be continuing within your movements and your projections of energy in
conjunction to this agenda, which you are accomplishing quite well subjectively
in addition to your objective expressions. Therefore, to you this
day I express much fondness, and au revoir!
Elias departs at 1:47 PM.
FOOTNOTES:
(1) There was a small amount of additional information
delivered here that has been withheld from this transcript for the time
being, at Elias’ request.
© 1998 Vicki Pendley/Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved
Copyright 1998 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.