Viewing the Entire Picture
Topics:
“Viewing the Entire Picture”
“Being Bridgers in the Emo-Wave”
Session 200806051 (2544)
“Viewing the Entire Picture"
"The Language of the Inner Senses"
"Communication Bridgers"
"Popping into Another Reality"
Thursday, June 5, 2008 (Private/Phone)
Participants: Mary (Michael) and Anjuli (Myranda)
ELIAS: Good afternoon! (Chuckles)
ANJULI: Oh! Did you say “Good afternoon”?
ELIAS: I did.
ANJULI: (Laughs and Elias chuckles) I didn’t hear that. (Both laugh) Now I don’t have to think anymore how to start the session. (Both laugh) Ja. And then you laughed? You laughed because you knew I wasn’t understanding?
ELIAS: Yes.
ANJULI: You laughed?
ELIAS: Yes.
ANJULI: You were amused? (Laughs)
ELIAS: Quite so. For now it begins. (Both laugh)
ANJULI: Aha! Hm. (Pause) I have sometimes at times rescheduled this session in various ways, because I didn’t know exactly how to do the talking. Ha! Ah. (Elias chuckles) And I wanted to have some more experiences, which I got. (Laughs)
ELIAS: Very well.
ANJULI: Okay. I was a little bit talking with Mary now about it, to see how much of it I can verbalize. I think I'm exploring something that is very interesting for me and it’s a little bit more unfamiliar, and that’s why it’s so exciting. And I translate through my emotions whenever I focus on that again, that this fits for me and that I love it. And now I am curious what it is.
When I talk with people or when I am in situations when I do the usual interaction, it feels more like interacting with the situation and not necessarily with the people. Or even if I do, I am at the same time aware of that of course, that these are people and I am acknowledging them and all that, but after that situation, especially if it’s an uncomfortable one and I had too much… maybe not enough my attention on presence and all that, that I put it like I am doing now with three situations like this, and then all of a sudden (sighs) I'm sensing lots of knowingness and experiences. And it’s as if I interact with the situation and maybe using inner senses a lot. So, okay. Can I now ask what it is? (Laughs)
ELIAS: I would express that you have explained what you are doing, for you ARE engaging your inner senses, and what you are doing is allowing yourself to engage your periphery. Rather than merely entirely focusing upon another individual and what they are expressing or how they are expressing, you are allowing yourself to engage your periphery, which allows you to assimilate all that is occurring.
In a manner of speaking, what most individuals do when they engage an interaction with another individual is they focus their attention. And in that, in a manner of speaking, what they are doing is they are focusing in upon the subject of the picture. They are focusing in upon certain details of a picture. What you are doing is allowing yourself to incorporate, in a manner of speaking, a step backward from the situation or from the interaction and allowing yourself to engage and view the entire picture, not merely certain details of it.
But in engaging the entire picture, you allow yourself to engage your periphery, and that allows you to assimilate what is occurring and to understand what is occurring; but in engaging the entirety of the picture, you may not necessarily incorporate an immediate ability to respond specifically. For the other individual is focusing upon the details of certain aspects of the picture, and what they are looking for is the response to those details, which would be specific responses. What you are doing is you are engaging the entirety of the picture, and therefore that creates somewhat of a temporary obstacle in how to respond in communication with what you know and what you have assimilated, but not necessarily addressing to the specifics in the manner that the other individual is.
ANJULI: Oh. Yes. Right. I felt that when I talk with Gottlieb, for example, and he explains in detail what is going on. And in the past, I had an ease and was saying this to that and this to that, and now that has changed because I'm doing what you say and I don’t know exactly how to…It would distract me to answer in more detail or to these details, because I am fascinated by this other way of interaction and viewing the picture. And then after this talk I can even sometimes feel a little bit disappointed because I want to talk about or express what I am doing or my experiences, but even if he would ask me or I would say I want to talk about that, I wouldn’t know what to say or how to interact.
ELIAS: I am understanding. But I will express to you that as you continue engaging in this manner and practice with it, you will become more familiar with how to be responding in language in an effective manner. It is merely that you are engaging an adjustment time framework in which you are shifting from a familiar manner of communicating to an unfamiliar manner of communicating, and therefore you are unfamiliar with the words that will express accurately what you want to express.
Most individuals are familiar with communicating in a manner in which they choose a common subject. One individual introduces a subject, and they begin conversing in relation to that subject. And each individual expresses their input, their opinion or their insights in relation to that specific subject. And in many situations, when individuals are interacting in a personal manner the subject matter is associated with their personal experiences. Therefore, they are discussing back and forth different aspects of the actual physical experiences, such as a hypothetical example: You may engage a conversation with another individual and express, “I took a trip to a shop this day and I saw many objects that I very much appreciated, and one object was very interesting to me,” and you may elaborate in association with the continuation of the subject.
Now; the other individual will engage the conversation in similar manner, in responding to what you are saying and interjecting different elements of their own experiences that may be similar or may be different, and they may also express their own preferences and opinions. And in this, you are exchanging information in relation to physical experiences.
Now; you are very accustomed to manipulating language in relation to physical experiences. You are not as accustomed to incorporating language or manipulating language and words in relation to experiences that are not necessarily physical. Therefore, when you incorporate a step back and you are engaging the entire picture in your interaction with the other individual, the other individual is expressing the details of the specific subject and the physical experiences that have been generated. You are incorporating listening but also viewing the entirety of the picture, which, many elements of that picture may not necessarily be expressions of the physical experience. They may be associations, or they may be feelings, or they may be different nuances in perceptions which are not necessarily expressions of the actual physical experience; but they are definitely a part of the entirety of the experience, for they are different aspects that color the experience.
In this, assimilating the entirety of the picture creates a situation in which you are unfamiliar with how to manipulate words and language to express your knowing of the situation and of the subject in the entirety of the picture, not merely in the specific details of it.
ANJULI: Mm-hm. I see.
ELIAS: Not that you will not develop this, for you can and you will. But this is a new direction, and therefore it may be necessary to allow yourself to practice with it and play with it for a time framework and to play with attaching different or new words, expanding your words to associate with the knowing that you incorporate inwardly.
ANJULI: And how does this seem to the other people, when I interact like this and in this unfamiliar way? Is this confusing for others or…?
ELIAS: I would express that to an extent it can be somewhat confusing, in different degrees. I would also express that at times another individual may not necessarily recognize that you actually understand what you are assimilating, for you are not offering the specific feedback that is expected. Therefore, the other individual may perceive that they are not being understood. For this is the familiar direction in which you verify with each other that you are being understood, that when you express a subject matter that the other individual will feed back to you in specifics also, which verifies to you that you are being understood. And if the other individual does not feed back to you in a manner that acknowledges what you have expressed – whether they agree with it or not matters not, but the acknowledgment of what they have expressed is important for verification to them that you understand what they are expressing.
This is the familiar avenue of communication that you all engage. And when an individual changes that, other individuals may become somewhat confused or they may perceive that they are not necessarily being understood, for they are not being acknowledged in (coughs) a repeat of what they have expressed or (coughs) in a statement of specific acknowledgment. (Coughs)
ANJULI: Is Mary okay?
ELIAS: (Coughs) One moment.
ANJULI: Okay. (Pause while apparently Elias pops out and then returns)
ELIAS: Continuing.
ANJULI: (Laughs) She said she was getting a little shaky (Elias laughs), your energy was very strong.
ELIAS: Ah! All forms of communication.
ANJULI: Ja. (Laughs) And then I said, “Okay, we were talking about connecting,” about this whole subject we had just talked about, Mary and me. (Both laugh)
ELIAS: I have expressed to other individuals, this particular wave [the emotional wave] incorporates a difference. It is much more intense than the other waves have been, and it is emphasizing ALL forms of communication, whatever they may be. And in that, it is also tremendously emphasizing differences, which is creating a significant intensity. (Chuckles)
ANJULI: Aha. So… Hm. So, it’s not our avenues of communication in which we communicate to ourself, but it’s also about interaction with it doesn’t matter what.
ELIAS: Yes.
ANJULI: With people, situations, all of consciousness, ourselves.
ELIAS: Yes, quite so.
ANJULI: The various so-to-speak "languages"?
ELIAS: Yes. All languages, all communications in all forms. Whether it be with yourself, whether it be with other individuals, whether it be with countries, whether it be with any situation, with creatures, with your environment, with ANY form of communication.
ANJULI: But it’s also cool, because I much more understand and experience that objective everything is consciousness, is beingness, and that I can interact. Well, it’s as if I recognize that I thought interacting—or a little bit thought—interacting is something you do with words and a mouth, and you talk with somebody who has a head and eyes (both laugh) and they are, so to speak, alive as you said in some of the very past sessions, but now… of course my books and my movies, but also the pillow, the wall, the curtains. That's fun! And situations and concepts…
ELIAS: Yes.
ANJULI: And Elias, one of the sessions we didn’t have – we’ve had a session instead of that, but we didn’t talk through phone and through so much in energy exchange; we talked through experiences. I created all of what I wanted to talk with you into experience. And I thought talking means, interacting means talking about, so to speak, information or objective situations, but not that I can experience and with this experience, so to speak, talk with you.
ELIAS: Yes. And your experiences are forms of communications also. There are many, many, many, many forms and avenues of communications.
ANJULI: (Pause) Right. Well, the direction I’m now exploring as to how I’m interacting seems to me very beneficial as to my explorations of the hologram, my reality as a hologram and playing with the hologram.
ELIAS: I would agree.
ANJULI: Ja? Uh-huh. Good to know. I mean, I see it, but this was something I would like to have some Sumafi to validate, as it is unfamiliar. (Elias laughs) But you know, I had a few exciting experiences after my hologram that works now, that my hologram is more fluid, Elias.
ELIAS: Ah! And what are your experiences?
ANJULI: Ja, first of all I see situations are coming up immediately, even if they don’t look as if they are magic, but they are because they are immediately responsive to something that I’m exploring.
ELIAS: Such as?
ANJULI: Huh?
ELIAS: Such as?
ANJULI: What do you mean? A situation, for example?
ELIAS: Yes. Yes.
ANJULI: Um, um, um… (Elias chuckles) Well, I forget. I forgot them. (Laughs) Um. Wait. (Pause) Hm. No. Well, maybe I just continue?
ELIAS: Very well.
ANJULI: With these two situations, one situation was when I watched one of my favorite telenovelas, and there was at the end somebody died in there, and there was music and they were not at the graveyard. They were doing a ceremony at a lake, and there was music in the background, and then suddenly I had this very strong experience as if I was merging with at least five or more focuses I had with you and with other of my dear essences about that specific topic that was explored in the movie. Like disengagement, moving to other areas, interacting in new ways, feeling like you say....The music was “Good-bye, My Lover” [by James Blunt], and then this feeling of that focus, of sensing that for example you died in a focus and I had connected with that focus of how I want to continue to explore this relationship in another focus where you are not physically focused, and how that is linked, those two focuses. And then I was even sensing a focus you had with Patel and various of these things.
Then, I liked that music so much that a few hours later I went to the internet, where the whole movie would be repeated, and I checked that part on the lake about that ceremony, and there was not this song “Good-bye, My Lover; ” there was just the usual, normal instrumental music. And my mother had seen that movie too, so I asked her, because I knew she would have reacted quite intensely on such music and would have been reminded of my father, but she said, “No, there was just some instrumental music, not something special.” And then I realized, ah, well apparently I had created that song into that movie. I mean, I create everything, but when I create something outside of what others create in the collective or a TV or something, that it seems much more like recognizing my power.
ELIAS: Yes.
ANJULI: And it was then very intense to me, so to speak.
ELIAS: Yes.
ANJULI: But I don’t know if that’s an example as you had asked for. That is more an example of creating something that is so outstanding that it feels now that's my hologram and I create my hologram completely on myself. Other situations would be something like about my mother, I think about something and then my sister talks about it, or… Ja, now I remember it. My mother had problems on Sunday about….Ah! Now, I remember it, Elias! Ja! Now you get your situation. (Elias laughs) Are you still there?
ELIAS: Yes.
ANJULI: Okay, that other situation was on a Sunday when my mother was frustrated about no daughter interacting with her. That was a Mother’s Day, and then I did this communicating, this interacting with… like we said at the beginning, interacting with the whole situation and sensing this whole situation. And on the outside I said okay, maybe still wait for half an hour, my younger sister may come and my elder sister will also come, or maybe we’ll just wait a little bit. Well, and then my younger sister came and went with her to a lake, and there my older sister, just intuitively without phone or what, just going there. And so then my mother created both of her daughters being there at the lake. And this whole situation was right away addressing to what I had investigated innerly as to Sundays and my mother and expectations and at least a thousand other things. And then it got created right away into a hologram and solved.
Okay now, Elias, now you can talk.
ELIAS: (Laughs) And I would—
ANJULI: About the two examples I gave, please.
ELIAS: And I would express that these are two fine examples, for in the first example you are engaging one type of communication in which you are creating your own insertion of a particular song to create your own connection with different focuses and different interactions. Therefore, you created a physical insertion of this particular form of communication, the song, which creates the catalyst for you to be connecting the different experiences and the continued experiences and the connection and the interaction between different focuses.
In the second scenario, you were allowing yourself to practice with this new manner of engaging and assimilating, and therefore also once again engaging the entirety of the picture and contributing to the connection and creation of the satisfactory interaction and the comfortableness of that interaction between all of the individuals.
ANJULI: Ah. Aha. Then… Then… Aha. So, when I am allowing myself to interact like this and stepping back and viewing the whole picture, this then…?
ELIAS: Allows you to manipulate energy in a manner that encourages the outcome that is more satisfactory. Which—
ANJULI: Aha! So, then for example another situation was we needed a key for the door of my mother, for the Red Cross, and we needed to make a copy of the key. And my younger sister and me, we went to a so-to-speak shop or what, where we thought we’d get it. And I thought okay, this is Friday, we are doing our weekend shopping and hopefully it’s not too much for her, although… Well no, that’s not what I thought. I did again this whole picture thing, and so there were many inner things going on and I watched them. And then we went there and he didn’t have the key and he sent us to another shop, but my sister said, “Ah, that’s great, now we went there anyway, I had to buy this iron thing.” And for the other shop, she said, “Ah, that’s great. Now I can do that and that.” And all the time when we went to another place she was excited because now she can do this shopping and that shopping. And then we said usually we create that we even meet in the same second in a shop, but now in addition to doing this time magic my younger sister and I do, it was about everything was not just beneficial but most efficient.
ELIAS: Yes!
ANJULI: And we both were so excited. So, this was also about that?
ELIAS: Yes! For what you are doing is you are expressing a cooperative energy and an encouraging energy, which not merely allows YOU to express in the manner that YOU want, but it encourages the other individual to express in the manner that THEY want and that is enjoyable for them also.
ANJULI: Aha. And so, for example, when I have other situations where I am, let’s say maybe I think I should communicate in the old way, although I don’t want to and in this I am opposing myself, then more situations are created which are around confusion and not understanding each other?
ELIAS: Yes. And less comfortable.
ANJULI: Aha. Because I had two, well I have three examples where I created like that, and… So, I can view the one situation and the other situations and step back again and view them in this way as I do, and does this get more information and then validate myself as to how I can allow myself to interact like that, because that’s beneficial for the others also?
ELIAS: Yes.
ANJULI: Aha. Aha. Huh. And for example when I had a time, and maybe it still continues when I read—I’m interacting again a little bit on the internet; not as intensely, but… But I am curious as to how to do that with this new exploration. And so I do that, and when there are long mails I can’t read them. If I try and I read the words, I can’t… That doesn’t work, maybe because I pay attention again to the whole picture and then I can’t do those two things? Or is it also about language and that the other person has a more… like explaining something, like Opan for example likes to explain something in very detail, and I am more—and Oba, for example, writes short mails. And the ones of Oba are easier for me [than] the ones of Opan.
ELIAS: Yes. And these also would be examples of differences in how you communicate, and in those differences allowing yourself to express in your natural manner but in what capacity you can, allowing yourself to engage other individuals in accepting their difference but, in a manner of speaking, converting that in a manner that is more effective for you.
ANJULI: Mm-hm. Aha. And then how does that fit in with what Mary and me just talked about, the example she had as to interactions? And she says she is very confused, she thinks it is about her thought-focusedness but that’s… She said she takes words very literal and then there is a stop point. I think… Ja. It was also about different languages, that she realizes her kind of language and other languages are different, and then… Was that also something like that? What is she…?
ELIAS: Yes.
Now; let me express to you a clarification in association with this subject. As you are aware, when I expressed the introduction of this wave, I did express that individuals of the thought focus and political focus would incorporate more difficulty in this wave than other individuals.
Now; I have also expressed that to somewhat of a capacity or degree, the political-focused individuals do incorporate some ability to be bridgers. The emotionally-focused individuals incorporate the GREATEST capacity to be bridgers. Not all individuals incorporate this capacity to be bridgers. The reason that I expressed that thought-focused individuals would incorporate more difficulty is that generally speaking they do not incorporate much capacity to be bridgers, if at all. Thought-focused individuals process information differently, and in the manner that they process information, a thought-focused individual can be a bridger in communication conceptually very well, but they do not necessarily incorporate the capacity to be a bridger in relation to language abstractly.
ANJULI: Ja. Uh-huh.
ELIAS: Emotionally-focused individuals process information through feeling and intuition. And in this, they do incorporate the capacity to express in language much more abstractly. Thought-focused individuals do not incorporate this capacity. Therefore, it would be unrealistic to expect that these individuals could engage an action of being a communication bridger, for they do not incorporate that aspect of being abstract in association with language. They can be very abstract in association with concepts, but not necessarily with language.
This is the reason that I also expressed the encouragement to the emotionally-focused individuals that this is an opportunity in this wave for them to generate a considerable contribution to change in being the bridgers of communication and therefore creating an atmosphere of more harmony in allowing themselves to express being those bridgers. But the one significant factor that I have expressed in relation to this subject and in relation to emotionally-focused individuals being bridgers is that it is essential that they not personalize, that when they are engaging other individuals and allowing themselves to be bridging communications that they are aware of themself, that they are present with themself, and that they are not personalizing. For in moving into the personalizing, it invalidates what they attempt to do, for that colors the communication.
ANJULI: Aha. Then this is what I am attempting to do or what I was exploring, for example, when there was a time when I was at the little mailing list [subgroup of former Yahoo Elias discussion board] about the AND pyramid and the other ones about the time bridgers, the one interacting with Leland and Ogean and Allesander, and the other one with Opan and the others. And there was a moment when I felt a little overwhelmed by mainly some expression differences, and I didn’t know how to communicate myself. And then that started to be frustrating and so I left the lists, and then both Leland and Opan wrote mails [asking] what happened and it could be corrected—I couldn’t. I couldn’t interact in the old way by clarifying their thought with this and this, I felt like this, or I understand, because they want so much that was… I—I just couldn’t. There was this whole thing about viewing the whole picture, and it was so intricate and there was no way of how to verbalize that. And then I thought okay, but I know we’re anyway good friends; I know, and they will understand, it will translate if I just allow myself to put this thing there on my inner… as I do with all situations.
ELIAS: Yes, I understand, and I am in agreement. But I would also express to you the suggestion that it is not necessary for you to incorporate an explanation. You can, in a situation such as you have expressed, merely express to the other individuals, “In this present moment I cannot express myself. In this present now, I am incorporating a difficulty and I cannot express myself.”
ANJULI: Mm-hm.
ELIAS: In this, there is no explanation necessary. It is an acknowledgment that the other individual has been heard. It is an acknowledgment that their attempt at connection has been made, and that is enough. That you are validating yes, you have received their connection, you cannot respond in this present time framework, and that is enough.
ANJULI: Mm-hm. Right.
ELIAS: For that does not express any judgment in relation to the other individual. It is not invalidating of the other individual. It is not expressing any personalizing with the other individual, and it IS expressing an acknowledgment of the reception of the connection. And I will express to you that I have been expressing to many individuals the emphasis of this point of not personalizing.
ANJULI: Mm-hm. Right.
ELIAS: For this is an important factor. I am aware that many individuals want to be participating in being helpful and being bridgers, but if they engage personalizing in the attempt to do so, they will thwart their own efforts and it will create the reverse of what they were attempting to engage.
ANJULI: Mm-hm. So, this expression that I am currently doing when I step back and view the whole picture, this would be a good thing?
ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, yes. This would be another avenue of it. For you are allowing yourself to assimilate the entire picture and therefore engaging your periphery and incorporating a wider view of the situation, not merely one aspect of it.
ANJULI: Even if I can’t write, currently verbalize that very much? It's a little bit some sentences here and there, but I feel that the interaction is there, but…
ELIAS: Yes.
ANJULI: Some understand.
ELIAS: Yes.
ANJULI: On the inner… on the inner, we interact much more intensely [than] before.
ELIAS: Yes. I would agree.
ANJULI: This is received.
ELIAS: And as I expressed to you previously, you will become more effective in the verbal communication, but it matters not in this present time framework, for you ARE communicating energetically and you are affecting energetically.
ANJULI: Uh-huh. Mm-hm. And yes, another situation. In the evening I was in bed and was doing my usual energy games that I am doing before I start to sleep, like interacting with you and Timothy, being aware of my energy field, and sensing that my whole environment is much more [than] the ones my physical senses, outer senses are perceiving that is a much vaster environment, and I am aware of that in various layers and all that. And then there was suddenly a loud, very loud sound. And then the entire physical reality was shifted into another one, another physical reality. It was not my bed anymore and the bedroom and the walls; there was something else. And it was not like blinking subjectively or something like that, or in a less solid or an out-of-body experience with a less solid… but also physical. It was physical. There was just the hologram, a solid, physical hologram changed into something else. But this something else was something I didn’t know. It was not something like a room and furniture or whatever is familiar for me. What was that?
ELIAS: I am understanding.
Now; I will express to you that you temporarily popped yourself into a different reality. And the reason that you incorporated the loud sound is quite understandable and would be a usual expression to accompany this type of action, for the significance of the sound is to emphasize and to solidify to you that you have actually changed, or entered a different reality.
In this, that sound or a similar sound would occur were you to actually physically pop yourself into an alternate reality or a probable reality or any other-dimensional reality. What you incorporated was popping yourself into an other-dimensional reality, and therefore—
ANJULI: One that I know already? Objectively?
ELIAS: In other focuses, you do. In other focuses that belong in that reality, you do. But one that you know objectively in YOUR reality? No.
ANJULI: Uh-huh. Not the ones I already connected with in this focus?
ELIAS: Correct. And I would express that this is a different action. This is not a projection. This is not what you term to be an out-of-body experience. This is an actual momentarily popping out of one reality and popping into another reality.
ANJULI: And then I guess it must be somehow associated with that other reality that I… in my attempts to understand what I experienced, I thought maybe that’s what the experience would be if I would… In my session about "being the story," in my session with you when we talked about being the story and you said this would be something to be, that the entire story would be something completely unknown.
ELIAS: Yes.
ANJULI: And I associated that with that. I thought okay, this must be what I translated into solidity, something completely unknown of being the story. And now I am wondering if that dimension maybe is exploring in this way of being whatever that is for them a story. But could you comment on that?
ELIAS: Yes. I would express that your assessment is correct.
ANJULI: Assessment. Aha! What’s the difference between impression and assessment, Elias?
ELIAS: An assessment is an evaluation.
ANJULI: Ah! (Laughs) We had that recently. Okay.
ELIAS: An evaluation is associated with accumulated information and information that may be related to different information. An impression is a communication.
ANJULI: Ahhh! Okay. The friend will be interested with that. (Elias laughs)
And then, of course, greetings from Gottlieb and from my mother.
ELIAS: And you may express my greetings to each of them and offer my lovingness to them both.
ANJULI: My mother said she really is very, very much longing for a session with you.
ELIAS: Very well. I shall be anticipating of that.
ANJULI: And Gottlieb asks playfully—now I don’t know how that (laughs) translates in English. Ja. Asks if (speaking German) "ob er dir schon auf die Nerven geht," [1] because he’s communicated so much with you. "Auf die Nerven gehen": what’s that in English? Being…? That was playfully meant, that question. Well, I don’t know how that… Let’s say, "Aha, we could practice another language, Elias."
ELIAS: (Laughs) Perhaps we can together invent a new language. (Elias chuckles and Anjuli laughs)
ANJULI: Or like I do with Sandy/Allesander when we just say, “Moo, ah, wee.” Then he answers, “See, ah, lo.” (Both laugh) We love that so much. (Both laugh) And Gottlieb wants to get the validation how he is processing as to his explorations, if he’s doing well in the direction of how he’s exploring.
ELIAS: In association with what?
ANJULI: His out-of-body experiences, explorations. As to his out-of-body experiences, if the direction he’s taking is a progress, he’s progressing?
ELIAS: I would express that ANY direction that he would generate in this subject would be a progress. (Both laugh) Therefore, you may offer my encouragement to him.
ANJULI: Okay. (Both laugh) Are we already at the end of the session, or can I ask another question?
ELIAS: You are completed, my friend.
ANJULI: I am completed. Okay. That’s good. (Elias laughs) We have another one next week.
ELIAS: And I shall greatly be anticipating of that. As always, to you, to your mother, to my other dear friends that you participate with, I express tremendous lovingness. And to you, my dear friend, a tremendous encouragement in your new adventure and explorations. (Chuckles)
ANJULI: Thank you very much, Elias. That was again such fun. I’m glad that I now manage to talk with you talking and about interacting. It’s fascinating, always.
ELIAS: (Chuckles) In great appreciation to you, my dear friend, au revoir.
[1] Gottlieb is asking if he gets on Elias' nerves.
(Elias departs after 1 hour 4 minutes)
©2008 Mary Ennis. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2008 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.