Session 2485

Not Expressing Full Capacity


“Not Expressing Full Capacity”
“Altering Influences of an Expressed Belief”
“Actions to Manifest an Intention”

Sunday, April 6, 2008 (Private / In-person, Castaic, California)

Participants: Mary (Michael), Anet (Alexi), and Eric (Orlando).

ELIAS: Good afternoon.

ERIC: Good afternoon.

ANET: Good afternoon, Elias. Good to see you again.

ELIAS: And you also. And what shall we discuss?

ANET: Well first, I’d like to find out Eric’s essence name. He had an impression: Nigel.

ELIAS: That is a focus name, and I would be acknowledging of you that you have discovered a name of another focus. (Eric and Elias laugh)

ERIC: Did I do this?

ANET: Yes, you told me that! That was your impression.

ELIAS: Essence name, Orlando.

ANET: That sounds familiar. Is there anyone else in the forum with that essence name?

ELIAS: It is possible. You may investigate.

ANET: Okay. (Anet and Elias laugh) I will. [Note: The essence name Anet was thinking of was Othello, not Orlando.] Is Orlando fragmented from Patel (I feel some Patel energy in him), and I wondered, Noel (that’s kind of a guess), and possibly Ordin?


ANET: Those three. Are there others?


ANET: All right. Now, as well as I know him, you would think I would have an easy time with his essence families; I have not. I’m going with, for his belonging, Tumold?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANET: His alignment, is that a subfamily of Gramada?

ELIAS: No. Gramada.

ANET: It is Gramada, okay. And he’s religious focus?


ANET: And common orientation, but he has a lot of what seem to be soft traits. I’ve wondered if a lot of his focuses (like 53% was my guess) are soft? Of his focuses in this dimension?

ELIAS: Approximately, yes.

ANET: Okay, so that might be why I perceive him as being closer to a soft than the typical common. Okay. Total focuses, initially I thought it was in the 800s, but it felt like it’s increased. I’m going with 1023.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANET: About one third are future?

ELIAS: Slightly less, but yes, approximately.

ANET: Okay. Now, shared focuses between Orlando and Alexi, are there 153?


ANET: Intimate, are there 63 that are intimate?

ELIAS: The first number would be intimate.

ANET: We have 153 focuses, and all 153 are intimate?

ELIAS: You incorporate more that you may meet, but not necessarily engage.

ANET: Right.

ELIAS: Or that you may encounter, but not necessarily engage, just as you in this focus encounter many, many, many individuals, but you do not necessarily engage them.

ANET: Okay. So it’s almost pointless to ask if we are soulmates! (All laugh) Okay, so we are soulmates. Now his colors – and these were actually some impressions Eric had – his essence color, is it a butter yellow?


ANET: And his focus color is a blue, like a primary blue?

ELIAS: Yes. (laughs)

ANET: And now for his animals – these were my impressions, but he agreed with them – his essence is an elk.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANET: And his focus is a beaver.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANET: He loves to build! And now, for essence intent (we kind of worked on this; I’m not sure it’s quite right), restoring and renovating things in a way that improves on the original?

ELIAS: Yes, you could express in that manner, as a theme of this essence.

ANET: That’s probably more geared toward this focus, that particular flavor of that theme.


ANET: Now, Eric’s brother Tim, essence name for him?

ELIAS: Essence name, Janna (J-A-N-N-A).

ANET: Okay. And it feels like he is a soulmate of both Eric and me, of Orlando and Alexi.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANET: For my brother, Eddie (Annore), he asked me if the spelling of his essence name may have changed, and the new spelling he thought might be A-N-N-O-R or E-N-N-O-R.

ELIAS: Let me explain. These are variations, for the essence name, as you are aware, is a tone.

ANET: Yes.

ELIAS: And is a partial translation of the tone; therefore in different time frameworks the tone can fluctuate, and therefore the name can fluctuate. So these are fluctuations.

ANET: So that’s what he was sensing.


ANET: Okay, good for him. Now, for my friend William (the Native American name he likes to use is Wind Walker, and that feels very familiar to me), his essence name?

ELIAS: Essence name, Naiki (N-A-I-K-I) (’nay-key’).

ANET: Okay. And I think he belongs to Tumold and is aligned Milumet.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANET: He’s a common.


ANET: Also religious focus.


ANET: His total focuses, 1863?


ANET: Shared focuses with Alexi, either 84 or 87.

ELIAS: The latter.

ANET: And we are soulmates. (Elias nods) And Naiki’s shared focuses with Elias, is it 37?

ELIAS: 32.

ANET: 32, okay. Now, for Xantha (Mary Sue), her impression of her intent is that it is to learn to trust herself, her abilities, and her own knowingness.

ELIAS: That would be all of your qualities! (Anet and Elias laugh)

ANET: Okay, so it’s a little more specific. It’s more specific than that.

ELIAS: It is more general.

ANET: No, but her actual intent is—

ELIAS: More general.

ANET: Oh, okay. And for her animals (we kind of both discussed this), one is a butterfly. I’m thinking essence is the butterfly and focus is the deer.


ANET: All right. And her essence colors (Mary Sue’s impressions), her essence color is indigo and her focus color is purple.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANET: And she feels a strong connection to Abraham Lincoln and has a strong impression that one of her focuses is Willy Lincoln, Abe’s son.

ELIAS: No, the grandmother.

ANET: She was the grandmother of Abraham Lincoln?


ANET: Okay. And is she also OEL [observing essence lifetime] to Abraham Lincoln?


ANET: And a counterpart as well?

ELIAS: Partially.

ANET: Okay. And for Willy Lincoln, does she have a connection with him?

ELIAS: Counterpart.

ANET: She’s a counterpart to Willy Lincoln. And is she OEL to Marilyn Monroe?


ANET: She bears a physical resemblance to the actress Gwyneth Paltrow, and I have wondered if that might be a focus of Xantha.

ELIAS: No, also counterpart.

ANET: Counterpart, okay. I feel like she has a focus who is a famous suffragette.


ANET: American?

ELIAS: English.

ANET: British, okay. All right, we will investigate that further. Now, shared focuses between Alexi and Xantha, 84?

ELIAS: 86.

ANET: 86. And we are soulmates. (Elias nods) And Xantha’s shared focuses with Elias, is it 26?


ANET: And six of those would be intimate?


ANET: Okay. Now for impressions for Alexi. For a tree that would represent my essence tone, a eucalyptus?


ANET: And for my Anet focus, a white willow?


ANET: Okay. And Zephyrus or Zephyr, the Greek god of the west wind, is that an other-dimensional focus of Alexi?

ELIAS: A representation, yes.

ANET: Right, a representation. But I think Zephyr is also the name of two of my future focuses.


ANET: One male and one female. (Elias nods) Bonnie Parker, of Bonnie and Clyde notoriety, is she one of Alexi’s – is Alexi directing of Bonnie Parker?

ELIAS: No, observing.

ANET: Observing! OEL, though – observing lifetime. (Elias nods) Okay. Patsy Cline, the country singer, is she a focus of Alexi?

ELIAS: Counterpart.

ANET: Counterpart, okay. Observing as well?


ANET: Just counterpart, okay. And Elwyn Brooks White, E.B. White, the American writer who co-authored Elements of Style, is he a focus of Alexi?


ANET: This one wasn’t a strong impression, it was just a fleeting type of thing, but Veronica Franco, who’s the Venetian poet and courtesan, is she a focus of Alexi?

ELIAS: Observing.

ANET: OEL? (Elias nods) Okay. And Alexander Schmorell, a member of White Rose Society in Nazi Germany, is he a focus of Alexi?


ANET: Okay. That seems to be a group focus, with some other people as well. Okay. Shaquille O’Neal, the American basketball player, OEL and counterpart?


ANET: Michelle Phillips of The Mamas and The Papas, partial observing?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANET: Jean Shrimpton, British model, partial observing?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANET: Pattie Boyd, the British model, partial observing?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANET: And counterpart as well?

ELIAS: At times.

ANET: Okay. And this is an impression I had, that Alexi has 123 focuses that are some variety of prostitute, courtesan, concubine, that sort of thing – 123, mostly female but a few males.


ANET: Okay. And Alexi’s shared focuses with Munya, 135?

ELIAS: Correct.

ANET: And shared focuses with Paneus, 27?


ANET: Now, impressions again for Eric/Orlando. Michael Beckwith, the New Thought minister, is he a current focus of Orlando?

ELIAS: Observing.

ANET: Observing lifetime? (Elias nods) Sophie Scholl, Sophia Scholl, member of White Rose Society, is a focus of Eric’s? (Elias nods)

ANET: And Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dali Lama – Eric is observing lifetime?


ANET: Mahatma Gandhi, observing lifetime?


ANET: And there’s a focus of Orlando who was one of the founders of the city of Santa Fe, New Mexico?


ANET: And he’s Hispanic and Native American? (Elias nods) Okay, I know what he looks like but I don’t have a name on that! (laughs) Okay, and in the 1960s in Italy, Orlando is a well-known photographer and Alexi is fashion model.

ELIAS: Overlapping, yes.

ANET: Okay, yes, that would be overlapping. And Orlando and Yuki are soulmates?


ANET: Soulmates of Alexi, in addition to the ones you’ve already confirmed – I’m going in alphabetical order – Alandra?


ANET: Annore? (Elias nods) Arkandin?


ANET: Awan?


ANET: Ayla?


ANET: Baruch?


ANET: Bashar?


ANET: Fontine?


ANET: Elias?


ANET: No! Okay. Iona?

ELIAS: No, that would be more similarities of essence.

ANET: Okay, I can see that. Mario?


ANET: Noel?


ANET: Oba?

ELIAS: No, that would be considerable counterpart action in many focuses.

ANET: Okay. Ordin?


ANET: Patel?


ANET: Seth?


ANET: Shauntah?


ANET: No! Shilou?


ANET: Tomkin?


ANET: Twylah?


ANET: Xutrah?


ANET: Yuki?


ANET: Okay. And my friend Jan M., is he a focus of the essence Jann, who is a member of the Elias forum?

ELIAS: Counterpart.

ANET: Counterpart; I knew there was a connection. Now, Galileo – I have long had the impression that Tess (who is in the Elias forum; his name is John) is directing of Galileo.

ELIAS: Observing.

ANET: Observing lifetime?


ANET: Okay. And is Tess also observing lifetime of Albert Einstein?


ANET: And I feel that sometimes he switched to directing, briefly.


ANET: Okay. And for Xutrah – this is Xutrah’s impression – he feels that he is partial directing of Smenkhkare/Moses?


ANET: And he also has an impression that Smenkhkare was intersex, what he would call intersex, that he switched his gender from either male to female or female to male?


ANET: And that that was the demarcation of the break in directing, that in the early part of his life, Xutrah was directing Smenkhkare, and then he had the sex switch and another essence took over directing.


ANET: All right, so that confirms his impression. And he also – Xutrah thought he might be OEL to Cumie or ’Ma’ Barrow of the Bonnie and Clyde clan.


ANET: And is Clyde directed by Patel?


ANET: No, okay. He isn’t Orlando, is he?

ELIAS: No. (Anet and Eric laugh)

ANET: Okay, that was a wild guess! That would be scary. Okay. Now, the sensations of heat I sometimes feel in my body, are they an indication of energy from other essences that I’m sensing?

ELIAS: At times. At times it is a building of YOUR energy.

ANET: Okay. And so, should I take that – if I’m building my energy….I think at times I’ve been doing it because I needed momentum to accomplish something I perceived as difficult, and that’s why I was getting a lot of those feelings.


ANET: So is it something that would be beneficial to me to try to release it, or should I just say, ’Oh, I’m building energy for something’?

ELIAS: No, it is not necessary to release it, for the purpose is to be energizing.

ANET: Okay, okay. So it’s a beneficial action.


ANET: I mean, it’s not anything wrong with me.

ELIAS: Correct.

ANET: All right. And I probably don’t need to ask this, but the head pressure I get – which sometimes can be intense and sometimes accompanied by disorientation – that is from expansion of neural pathways?


ANET: And I’m just letting myself know that I’m doing that! (Elias laughs) Okay. Now, there’s a horrible feeling I sometimes get that is hard for me to describe. It’s a combination of an intense form of regret, and hopelessness, and depression; I don’t know. That feeling, that’s a signal, and I’m not exactly sure what that is telling me. Is that when I’m denying myself choice?

ELIAS: In a manner of speaking. It is more associated with a sense that you are not allowing yourself the fullness of your capacity, which could be expressed as denying yourself choice, but it is more specific than merely denying yourself choice, for it is more associated with your potentials and your capacity to express, and at times you do not trust what you CAN express.

ANET: Okay. And I’m really letting myself know that in a very strong way! (Elias laughs) Is that related to what you’ve talked about ’essence weeping’?

ELIAS: No, that would be somewhat different, for that is a genuine denial of self and devaluing of self. I would express that you do not devalue yourself in the capacity that you did previously. (Anet laughs) You have generated considerable movement in that direction, and I also am acknowledging of you in all that you have accomplished, but at times you do restrict yourself in an association that, yes you have accomplished considerably, but perhaps it is possible that you may not incorporate the ability to accomplish more, and that is incorrect. But it does create a response, a physical response, within you, to signal you that this is incorrect. And perhaps if you are uncomfortable, you will notice and you will acknowledge yourself, and allow yourself to continue in that appreciation, which does allow you to accomplish.

ANET: Okay.

ELIAS: Now, I will express that it is possible that with the onset of this wave, that could be triggered. And know that it is merely a matter of acknowledging yourself to dissipate it.

ANET: Okay, that’s good to know. Thank you.

I’m having – indecision is not the right word – but I’m carving out sort of a new life path for myself that I feel involves working as a healer in some capacity. And I am well aware that it is not appropriate to try to cross the line into fixing other people – you know, fixing, or educating, or that kind of thing – but I do see cases where somebody just needs a little extra energy to get where they’re intending to go. They have self-insight. And I think, I know the natural Tumold way of healing is, you walk into the room and your vibration helps the other person. And you know, that’s wonderful; I’m sure to some extent I’ve done that all my life. But I don’t think it would be inappropriate to take it to a more objective level of having somebody come to me, and me assisting them in energy. And that I wouldn’t be crossing the line into fixing.

ELIAS: No. This is precisely what I am expressing to you in the reason why you generate those moods, so to speak. For in subjects and areas such as this, you question yourself much more than is necessary. You move in excessive caution. You incorporate such a hesitancy to be overstepping the boundary, or in concern of being intrusive, or engaging a wrong action, that you restrict yourself and you do not allow yourself the fullness of your capacities.

I would encourage you to allow yourself to move forward and to engage more, and not to question yourself excessively. Listen to your intuition. Listen to what you feel. And allow yourself to move in the direction and express yourself and connect. Stop concerning yourself so tremendously with not instructing. (Anet and Eric laugh) You are so concerned with not instructing that you would naturally not do it. You will naturally share, and you incorporate such an apprehension in relation to fixing that you will not do that either.

ANET: Okay.

ELIAS: You understand the movement of energy. You understand your role. You understand that with your participation, the other individual is generating the choice to alter a manifestation or not. Therefore you are not being intrusive, you are not fixing, and it is not necessary for you to be entertaining that continuously, for you will not do it. Merely allow yourself to express yourself naturally. And allow yourself to expand and engage with other individuals. You are moving in a direction of being helpful and supportive, not intrusive and not fixing.

ANET: Okay. Thank you. And so – I almost don’t need to ask this – but Naiki (William) and I, we’ve noticed a tremendous synergy of our energies, that we feel can be used for healing and assisting others, and that’s a direction you would encourage us to continue to move in?

ELIAS: Yes, and expand.

ANET: And expand, okay. What about – there’s a healing modality I’m interested in called Theta Healing. And not that there’s not value in investigating any of these avenues, of which there are many – but that one in particular, I’m undecided about whether to pursue training in that area. If I did, would that be advancing me in the direction I want to go, or not?

ELIAS: It is not that black and white.

ANET: (laughs) I knew you were going to say that!

ELIAS: First of all, once again it is a matter of listening to your intuition and what you resonate with. Therefore if you resonate with this method, then I would encourage you to pursue it; in this, remembering that it is not black and white, that you can assimilate and incorporate what resonates with you, and you can leave what does not. And you can inject your own variations also. You can incorporate some methods that you view as beneficial in your direction, and allow yourself, even in some of these methods, to incorporate your own creativity and develop your own variation of different methods that will allow you to express your healing abilities uniquely.

ANET: That’s what William and I were thinking, actually, because I’ve been trained in a healing modality,. And when I use it now, I notice myself incorporating other things into it, like the use of colors, that aren’t in the initial training. And so we were thinking we could use the various things we’ve both learned and craft our own method out of those, uniquely tailored to us.

ELIAS: Yes, I would be encouraging of this.

ANET: Okay, okay. Now, when I align with a belief and have influences of that belief that I don’t prefer, what would be a way I could change that?

ELIAS: There are many times individuals incorporate an expressed belief and do not necessarily agree with their own expressed belief. In this, it is a matter of dissipating the expression of that belief and therefore allowing yourself to choose other influences of it other than the influences that you are allowing presently.

The manner in which you begin to do that is to lessen the importance of what you do not like. As I expressed, you pay attention to what is important; therefore if it becomes less important, you pay less attention to it, and it incorporates less power and less affectingness. Also acknowledging of that belief, that you do incorporate it, and that it is not necessarily bad, and that there are influences of any belief that would be more in keeping with your preferences. Offer an example.

ANET: Okay, let’s say a belief in aging and deterioration – that when you get older, your skin is less firm.

ELIAS: Very well. Now, there are different avenues that you can engage. The belief is aging. Now, what you expressed are influences of the belief. The influences are that you deteriorate, or you lose elasticity, or any specific expression of the belief of aging. Now, you are placing importance upon what you do not want; therefore you concentrate upon that and you become distressed. And when you become distressed, you somewhat obsess, which places more attention upon what you do not want and what you do not like. And it becomes more and more important, and it becomes a circle.

Therefore, first of all, you acknowledge that you do incorporate an expressed belief in relation to aging, which almost all individuals do. Rather than concentrating and paying attention to what you do not like, allow yourself to begin paying attention to what you do like. Appreciate what you are already creating, and acknowledge that. This is important, for as I expressed yesterday, this occurs many, many times with individuals. They actually are accomplishing in precisely what they want, but they are not acknowledging their accomplishment. They are not crediting themselves with their accomplishment.

I can express to you in this moment that you are accomplishing, moving in a different physical expression than the expressed belief of the aging that you incorporate. You are already engaging the action and you are already accomplishing; therefore move your attention to the accomplishment and the acknowledgement, and also move your attention to what you appreciate and what you like – what you want, not what you do not want.

ANET: Right. For instance, eyesight. I have perfect eyesight. I’ve never needed any vision correction, which is something that’s not true of most of the population of this country, so give myself credit for that.

ELIAS: Yes, and appreciate that, or appreciate your accomplishment in association with your skin.

ANET: Part of it, Elias, is that because I have this book I have written on the topic of aging, I put pressure on myself. You know it’s about aging and beliefs and that we don’t have to go down this path to deterioration. But partly I feel like I need to be absolutely perfect in the sense of not showing any signs of aging, or nobody is going to think there’s any value in what I have to say.

ELIAS: Not so. What you are doing is incorporating personal responsibly for the rest of the world. (Anet laughs) And if that does not age you, I assure you I know not what will!

ANET: (laughs) Good point, good point. You know, I realize that other people…

ELIAS: That was your expression of sharing yourself, and your preferences, and your ideals, and you did, and you accomplished. And in that, do not place the tremendous pressure of incorporating personal responsibility in relation to all of your readers. Concentrate your attention upon you and what you want, and not upon the perception of other individuals, but rather in relation to what you want to accomplish and what you have accomplished.

ANET: I’m in the process of revising the book, not tremendously so far. I feel like – I reread it and I was prepared to say, ’This isn’t very good, I’ll just set it aside,’ and you know, let it die a calm death. But I realized it’s really good. It could benefit a lot of people, and I felt like a bad mother who had kept her talented child locked in a closet for four years! And I decided I need to dust it off and put it out there again. And because my energy is more open; I am hiding less than I was four years ago. And I know that I am the only reason, my energy is the only reason it didn’t get a broader readership. But I’m in the process of putting it out there again, thinking that with my changed energy…. Would you agree it’s a worthwhile endeavor for me to put it out there again?

ELIAS: Yes, but not be the statue of it.

ANET: Well put, well put. And more than likely other people would not judge me as harshly as I’m judging myself – like that’s all in my mind.

ELIAS: They incorporate nothing to judge.

ANET: (laughs) Yes, yes. Good point.

ELIAS: When you read a book, do you judge the author?

ANET: Not usually. Not in that extreme, at any rate.

ELIAS: Precisely.

ANET: Although I do expect them – if it’s a book about health or beauty or that kind of thing – I do expect them to be somewhat an example of the success of their ideas.

ELIAS: I am understanding, but each individual’s perception of what that example is, is different.

ANET: True.

ELIAS: You are holding yourself to a standard. You are creating yourself as the statue. Every other individual will incorporate a different perception of what that example is, and their perception may not be what yours is. And their definition of beauty or health may also be different. Therefore they will glean what they want that benefits them and that fits with their perception. And they will view you as the example of what they incorporate as useful, and you will have already accomplished the standard. Your standard is not everyone’s standard.

ANET: Thank God! (Elias laughs) Thank you.

In a discussion I was having yesterday with another Elias person, we were talking about making changes. And she’s known someone who has – people have actually changed their height, which is not something I am particularly interested in personally, but the idea of changing things that are supposed to be unchangeable can be applied broadly—

ELIAS: Yes, this is quite correct.

ANET: —you know, to these incurable diseases, in all sorts of other areas. So I’m fascinated with this, and of course, typically when somebody has what they perceive to be a problem, they go into oppositional energy and just exacerbate it. But even if it’s something that is not being opposed, but it just isn’t commonly believed to be possible, it is as simple as intending it and trusting it and having it done. And in fact the person I was talking to has experienced this, and I saw an example of it. But how – I believe all things are possible, and even possible for humans, but I don’t believe I can do them all. I don’t necessarily believe they’re possible for me. And you can’t fake the trust; it’s an energy thing. So sometimes an action is required to facilitate that, like I believe I can accomplish this if I intend it and then I take an action. And often, if the action isn’t too big a deal, that’s the path of least resistance. But with things that you don’t know what the action is, how could I do that? How could I intend it and have it happen?

ELIAS: Remember all that you do is interconnected. Although it may not appear so surfacely, it is. For all that you do is constructed of energy. Therefore if you choose a particular manifestation that you want to generate, it is a matter of setting the intention, not concentrating upon the outcome, but engaging the action of the process by engaging actions that generate the same energy.

ANET: Yes.

ELIAS: Just as in your example of an individual that increases height, it is a matter of an energy of increasing volume. Therefore there are many different expressions that you can engage in your daily activities that are expressing that energy of increasing volume of ANY manifestation.

ANET: So if that person were to – if they had a pair of shoes that was too tight, and they went and got them stretched.


ANET: That would be the same kind of thing. Okay, and that’s—

ELIAS: Yes. Mundane actions that create the same energy as the energy that you want to produce in what you want to accomplish. The consistency of projecting that energy and engaging actions that express that energy increases how you attract to you precisely what you want to create.

ANET: That makes sense, and I understood that long ago with people losing weight by getting rid of clutter. And I understood that relationship, but that’s broader with anything, and sometimes it is not quite so obvious how the energy is the same.

ELIAS: Yes, for surfacely an action can appear entirely unrelated or can appear to be entirely different. For perhaps the individual may visit a restaurant and may choose to order a meal that is larger than they can actually consume, but they are greatly appreciating of what is presented even if they do not consume it all. That is another expression of volume.

ANET: Hmm, all right. I wouldn’t have thought of that one.

ELIAS: Therefore the actions, as your objective reality is so very abstract, can be very different and diverse and appear to be entirely unrelated, and would appear surfacely that this action that I am incorporating cannot possibly be associated with this direction that I want to create, but in actuality it is, for it is a matter of the energy that is being expressed in those actions.

ANET: That was the time last summer when I saw a man with weed killer, trying to get rid of weeds. And I was getting a bleed-through impression of a terrorist focus of mine, and I realized that’s the same energy. You’re trying to get rid of, wipe out something that you think doesn’t have a right to exist.


ANET: Okay. I do think of that a lot. I think of those relationships between energy expressions, so that is not too big of a stretch for me.

ELIAS: Yes. Correct. For this is what you do. All that you do is interconnected, and it is a matter of interpreting and translating the energy that is associated with what you do. For generally, in many situations, most individuals are not thinking in relation to what they are doing in mundane situations. This is the reason that many individuals repeatedly create experiences that they do not want, or repeatedly create experiences that they do want. For they are continuously reinforcing a particular energy that attracts the same, whether it be, in your terms, good or bad. It is a matter that they are continuously engaging actions in mundane matters. As I have expressed many times previously, in actions as nonthinking as dusting, or washing your dishes, or engaging a film, or reading a book. What type of actions are you doing? How are you doing them? What are you expressing? What are the associations with what you are doing? Most individuals do not incorporate a thought process of what they are associating with while they are dusting.

ANET: Yes, typically not.

ELIAS: But they are projecting an energy. And that energy may be the same energy in the individual creating an overwhelm in some interaction with another individual. Now the individual will not incorporate a thought process, ’I was dusting previously in this week, and that is related or associated with this tremendous conflict that I have created with this other individual.’ But dependent upon what type of energy was being expressed while the individual was engaging the action of dusting, perhaps moving through their home dusting and inwardly expressing, ’I hate this.’

ANET: Oh, that they hate that they’re having to dust.

ELIAS: ’I hate engaging this action, and I hate engaging this residue. I hate that it is present.’ The energy is very opposing.

ANET: So you could be engaging the same action with different energy and different intent. For instance, when Eric is dusting and he likes it (laughs), and that would be totally different energy, but to an observer it might look identical.

ELIAS: Yes, but the energy is different. And in that scenario, the individual may be more engaging, for you are generating an action that is engaging and enjoying it; therefore you are projecting that type of energy – an engaging energy. In this, it is all interconnected. Remember that.

ANET: Eric, do you have anything you thought of or would like to add? We have just a tiny bit of time left, but I don’t want to leave you out.

ERIC: I feel like an idiot, sound like an idiot.

ELIAS & ANET: No, no, no!

ANET: You don’t have to, just if you have something.

ERIC: I had a thought yesterday after attending the first session with you. Is what you are expressing, you to us – it’s basically physics? It’s the map behind everything, and the particles and the energy.

ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, but in a manner that does not require a physicist to understand.

ERIC: Okay, I like that. Very well. (Elias laughs) I obviously have to stop there, because I can’t think of anything else.

ELIAS: Even a small one can understand what I express. (laughs)

ANET: Okay. We are at an hour, it appears.

ELIAS: Very well. I will express my enjoyment, my appreciation for our interaction. I anticipate our next meeting, and I express tremendous affection and lovingness to you both. I shall be offering my presence continuously in encouragement.

ANET & ERIC: Thank you, Elias.

ELIAS: To you in great joy, au revoir.

ANET: Au revoir.

Copyright 2008 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.