Monday, December 18, 2006 (Private/Phone)

Participants: Mary (Michael) and Jim S. (Bevan)

ELIAS: Good afternoon.

JIM: Good afternoon, Elias. Good to talk to you again.

ELIAS: And to you also.

JIM: I’ve been missing your blue splotch lately. What happened? Am I crossed off your list?

ELIAS: (laughs) Definitely not!

JIM: Definitely not. That’s good.

ELIAS: (laughs) But you’re merely not paying attention as much as you were.

JIM: Maybe that’s entirely it.

ELIAS: (laughs)

JIM: Okay, well I have some questions. Shall I go ahead with them?

ELIAS: Very well.

JIM: I believe that I projected energy rather strongly to Senta Willings recently. Am I right?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. I was listening to a portion of Rachmaninoff’s Third Symphony in that time frame and I feel that my emotional reaction to the music both triggered the projection and formed my association of that music with Senta. Is that the case?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Did I project energy to the time frame in Senta’s life when she had to deal with Rico Cardinales disengagement.

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I feel that my energy was helpful to her in adjusting to Rico’s death. Is that the case?

ELIAS: You are correct.

JIM: It allowed her to replace Rico in her life with Rico’s grandson, Jimon?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Was she objectively aware of me at that time or did that come later?

ELIAS: Later.

JIM: Later. Alright. You have confirmed that both Senta and Madeline Kochs are objectively aware of me and that Bo Ni is to some extent. Are there any other focuses of Bevan who are objectively aware of me?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. If so, am I objectively aware of them?

ELIAS: Not yet.

JIM: Not yet. So, is there more than one?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. Interesting. Alright. The obituary picture of a young woman named Fawn Bear really caught my attention. I feel that I know her even though I never met her objectively. Am I observing essence of Fawn.

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Are Fawn Bear and Fawn Jameson counterparts?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is she by any chance a focus of Poalite?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She is. Am I offering her supportive energy as I hope I am?

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

JIM: Am I subjectively present to help her adjust to her post-disengagement conditions. I would like that to be the case.

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

JIM: Is she aligned Tumold?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Soft orientation and political focus?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Is Fawn Bear a final focus?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: No. I probably have a purpose for bringing her into my life in this time frame, but I can’t see what it is. Could you help me there?

ELIAS: To be practicing in directing your energy specifically in the manner that you want, but in more intensity.

JIM: Okay. Very good. How many focuses do Bevan and Mahji share in this dimension?

ELIAS: Eighty two.

JIM: Eight three?

ELIAS: Eight two.

JIM: Eighty two. Alright. Does Paul Richter, focus of Abduhl, belong Borledim?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Align Ilda?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: (long pause) Did you get that question, Elias?

ELIAS: Yes. I responded correct.

JIM: Correct. Oh, okay. Thought focused?

ELIAS: Political.

JIM: Political. I have Alice Tallman, a focus of Cuit, both belonging to and aligning with Zuli. Does she belong Zuli and align Vold?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Is Spartacus a focus of Cuit?

ELIAS: Observing.

JIM: Observing. Do I have his essence name in my focus database?

ELIAS: Not yet.

JIM: Not yet, so let me ask for his essence name then, please?

ELIAS: Jondue. J-O-N-D-U-E.

JIM: A-O-N-D-U-E.

ELIAS: J-O-N

JIM: What’s the first letter, sir?

ELIAS: J

JIM: Alright. I didn’t get it.

ELIAS: J

JIM: Alright. I’ll have to wait for the tape. Alright. Does he belong Tumold?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: How many lives shared with Bevan in this dimension?

ELIAS: Seventy one.

JIM: Seventy one. Align Vold?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: And emotional focus?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Is Letty Hastings a focus of Michella?

ELIAS: Observing.

JIM: Observing. Is Missy Larksong a focus of Anna?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I believe that I have a focus who is an editor. Do I?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: His name is Percival or Percy Lowell or Lovell. Lets try Percival Lovell, Lowell, Percival Lowell.

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: He prefers Percy to Percival?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: I see him in Chicago, post Civil War. Is that the time frame?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: He edits a weekly newspaper?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I believe he is much like me. That is, he aligns Gramada, common orientation, thought focused. Is that the case?

ELIAS: Yes. (pause) You are correct.

JIM: His wife’s name is Harriet?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: They have four children, two boys and two girls?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: They attend a Congregational Church?

ELIAS: Correct. (pause) Yes.

JIM: Percy helps with church business?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Percy has mixed emotions about the Emancipation Proclamation, but supports it for the most part?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Is Harriet a focus of Michella?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Okay. She aligns Borledim?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: The name, Harriet, brings the name Harriet Tubman to mind. By any chance am I either directing or observing essence of Harriet Tubman?

ELIAS: Observing.

JIM: Observing. Is she a focus of Michella?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: No. Alright. Is her essence name in my database?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: It is. Alright. I’ll have to see what I can do about that.

ELIAS: (laughs)

JIM: She aligns Milumet?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is she a focus of Hardy, by any chance?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: So I’m still wrong. Alright Does essence Anne have a focus named Lin Tu or Ling Tu?

ELIAS: The latter, yes.

JIM: The latter. Alright. She is a Chinese woman whose feet were bound?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Time frame early 1700s?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Align Zuli?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She is a counterpart of Sharon/Anne? Sharon, focus of Anne.

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes, you said?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I believe that she dies in childbirth. Is that the case?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Did her death have any influence in Sharon’s determination not to have children?

ELIAS: Somewhat.

JIM: Somewhat. Okay. Is Jim Plath a focus of Liam?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. Okay. I have him aligned Tumold. Is that correct?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Intermediate orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Thought focused?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Is his daughter, Bea, a focus of Michella?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. Alright. I believe she aligned Vold. Is that correct?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: (long pause) Did you answer that, Elias?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is Jim’s son, Phil, a focus of Poalite?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Okay. Do I have a focus by the name of Millie or Millicent Letterly?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I believe that she lives in Philadelphia in the late 1800s. Am I right?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Was she to some extent what might be termed a nymphomaniac?

ELIAS: In your terms, I would agree.

JIM: Okay. Did she choose to contract venereal disease in her late teens?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: And passed it along to a number of male partners?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: She chose to disengage in her late twenties of influenza?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She aligns Zuli?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Political focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is the man who starred in “Football Distractions” with Melody and Susan, is his name Gregory Burton?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is his essence name one that I have in my focus database?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: It’s in there. Okay, I’m going to have to get that.

ELIAS: (laughs)

JIM: He aligns Sumafi?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Political focus?

ELIAS: Yes. (pause) Yes.

JIM: Lives in Los Angeles?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Is Lydia Almond a focus of mine?

ELIAS: Counterpart.

JIM: Counterpart. I believe that she is a future focus paralleling… she is not my focus, is she? Oh, dear. That kills some of these questions on her. Well, she is a future focus, isn’t she?

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

JIM: Does her life parallel Mirabelle’s life, but in a different probable dimension?

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

JIM: Okay. Does she align Zuli?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Common orientataion?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Political focus?

ELIAS: Emotional.

JIM: Emotional. She specializes in creating exposés for media presentation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: She has two daughters, Eleanor and Jeanette?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Eleanor is the older and is a nurse practitioner?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Jeanette works with her mother on presentations?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Well, I’ll have to investigate further there. With regard to identity protection, you said that I create the image of Maria Montoya in gray to preserve my individuality and identity, yet I create the images of Muriel Parks and Madeline Kochs both faintly colored. I feel closer to Muriel and Madeline than I do to Maria. Is that why my images of them are tinted?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Okay. I can see where not creating a holster for my handguns is an identity protection with regard to Red Parsons. Is that the case?

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

JIM: I’ve never heard Lily Pons sing and have never heard “The Bell Song” from the opera, Lakmé. Could this be to protect my identity from both Lily and Lakmé since they are both focuses of Bevan?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is Ischia a focus of Esilia as I depicted in a story?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She exists in a shape-changer dimension?

ELIAS: You are correct.

JIM: Did she project a fragment of her personality to visit a focus of Esilia in this dimension?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Was my association of her with a wolf correct?

ELIAS: Yes. That would be correct.

JIM: Was my step-daughter, Charlotte, a focus of Hardy?

ELIAS: Counterpart.

JIM: Counterpart. Alright. Is her essence name in my focus database?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: So I’ve got to look for that one too. Did she align Tumold?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I think she became addicted to drugs while in high school. Did she?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: When she came crying to me, was it for money for drugs? I couldn’t get her to answer.

ELIAS: Partly.

JIM: Partly. Was her husband a wife beater?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Did he strike her hard enough to rupture her spleen?

ELIAS: Not quite.

JIM: Not quite. Okay. Did you flash our faulty stairwell light at me that day that I wrote the questions about my step-daughter?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: (laughs) You did.

ELIAS: (laughs)

JIM: Was that supposed to tell me that I had been enlightened?

ELIAS: (laughs) A validation of your trust. (both laugh)

JIM: Did Senta Willings project an image of her physical self to me?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I saw a naked woman standing facing me a short distance away. Was that her? I thought that’s who it was.

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Did her nakedness convey knowledge and approval of my stories or was it simply an acknowledgement of our mutual knowledge of each other?

ELIAS: Both.

JIM: Both. Okay. Is Muriel Richardson a focus of Hardy?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. Alright. Does she align Zuli?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: And emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I think that there was a relationship between my dream of large colorful centipedes and the spider that I reluctantly killed, but I don’t see the larger meaning of those symbols. Can you help me?

ELIAS: The symbols that you have presented to yourself is imagery that is reflective of your energy in compassion, and in association with your recognition of your interconnectiveness with all of your environment and all that is in it. And in this you present essentially and displayed colorfully as a [unintelligible] even in a manifestation that would not necessarily be considered beautiful. And in that it is a reflection of your appreciation of all that is in your reality and your interconnectiveness with it. And the reason that you incorporated the reluctance with the spider is the same.

JIM: Ah! Okay. In another spider dream, I was directed to a spider as a source of knowledge. I somehow missed the knowledge. What did I miss?

ELIAS: (laughs) This imagery is symbolic of creativity and a tremendous expression of creativity that you incorporate. And that is the knowledge that was being conveyed by the spider, for the spider in this imagery was the symbol of creativity.

JIM: Okay. The spider that I was directed to was one of three. What was the significance of the other two?

ELIAS: The significance that you presented three, for three is a significant number. For within consciousness there are expressions of three in the nature of consciousness. It also is expressed in many of your religions which is not…

JIM: That’s true.

ELIAS: … Which is not an accident, for that is a reflection of the nature of consciousness. In this as you presented three spiders, one being creativity, the other two would be of talent and ability.

JIM: Very good. Thank you. I feel that I have portions of Rachmaninoff’s Symphonic Dances associated with a focus of mine, but I can’t seem to pin that focus down. Do I really have such an association?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I do. I feel that this focus is a female, a tragic figure in my terms. Do I have that right?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I feel that I am getting a strong emotional signal from her. Am I?

ELIAS: Yes. You incorporate a great sensitivity for that type of energy.

JIM: Yes. I’m getting her name as Jeanette, no surname. Is that her name?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I’m not sure whether she exists in this dimension or not. I’m not even sure that she’s human, but I do get a strong sense of female gender. Does she exist in the dimension that’s familiar to me?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. If not… well I got a yes on that. Why am I having such difficulty identifying her?

ELIAS: That is temporary and that is associated with the tremendous sensitivity that you incorporate in relation to this type of energy, and preventing yourself from experiencing overwhelm you are presenting this focus in increments.

JIM: Ah! Yeah, she shakes me up all right. I think this question has an objective origin rather than being intuitive. Does Marina Tarasova play first cello with the Moscow Symphony Orchestra?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is she teaching others to play the cello?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Are my projections of love to her reaching her?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: In thinking about my emotional reaction to the harp solo passages in Glazunov’s “Four Seasons” it occurs to me that my reaction very likely reflects my love for my harpist focus, Helga Rivers. Am I right?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Helga is the reason that I value the picture of harpist Michelle Johanson that I use for my computer desktop, isn’t it?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: My friend Michael has asked questions concerning Tasha. He didn’t ask, but I wonder if she is a focus of Beauregarde. Is she?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: No?

ELIAS: Yes. (pause) Yes.

JIM: Yes. Okay. Alright. Aligned Zuli, like Michael?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Is she of common orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: And emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Okay. While I sat playing solitaire and listening to Khachaturian’s Spartacus and Gayaneh suites, I seemed to see a city, one that I recognized and yet didn’t recognize. The vision had a hazy quality, a sort of mystical aura that I find and enjoy in some music, and there seemed to be no movement in the city, no people. I sensed a sort of yearning in myself as though I wanted to be there and wasn’t. What energy was I sensing that caused me to perceive this vision?

ELIAS: This is associated with a future focus

JIM: A future focus.

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Okay.

ELIAS: One also that you are connecting with in increments as to not overwhelm yourself.

JIM: Aaah! (much enlightened) That’s the one I asked about before?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: It is. Okay. I have a feeling that the city is Samarkand. Is it?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Am I viewing… I am viewing the city through this other focus’s eyes, am I not?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Okay. It’s not Omar the rug dealer, then.

ELIAS: No.

JIM: I’ve been wondering about contemporary Bevan focuses in this time frame and this probable dimension. I believe that Marina Tarasova, Maria Capola, myself and Estan, the orca, are all experiencing lives in this probable dimension and this moment. Am I right?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Does Mirabelle Delacroix also exist at this moment?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: What’s Bevan’s current contemporary focus count then? Is it five?

ELIAS: Six.

JIM: Six. Alright. What is the… okay, we got that. How many total focuses in this probable dimension in this time frame?

ELIAS: In this present time framework or…

JIM: No. Present time frame, yes.

ELIAS: That has been responded to, six.

JIM: I’m sorry, I didn’t hear that.

ELIAS: That has been responded to previously.

JIM: Oh, it hasn’t changed from last time I asked?

ELIAS: Is it… You inquired momentarily and I expressed six.

JIM: Oh, that’s the contemporary. I’m talking total focuses of Bevan in this probable dimension. Has that changed?

ELIAS: Increased. (pause) It has increased.

JIM: Alright. Okay.

ELIAS: And I would tell you to investigate as to how much it has increased.

JIM: Ah!

ELIAS: As you are quite accomplished and you…

JIM: I got fifteen hundred and one last time. Have I added a couple more?

ELIAS: More than a couple.

JIM: More than a couple.

ELIAS: (laughs)

JIM: You’re not being very helpful, Elias.

ELIAS: Much more than a couple.

JIM: Okay, well, we’ll see what we can do about that.

ELIAS: (laughs)

JIM: Is the woman in the picture that I have labeled Esther really named Esther?

ELIAS: No. That is an association that you have generated for you do incorporate a focus with that physical naming that generates a very similar appearance.

JIM: Aaaah! (much enlightened) Okay. Very interesting. I have a focus… yes, okay, I was going to ask if she was a focus of … that’s not the case. In any case, does she align… does… no wait a minute… Oh, I’m all confused. Forget that, Elias.

ELIAS: (laughs)

JIM: That’s it. I’ve run out of questions.

ELIAS: (laughs)

JIM: And I thank you very, very much for this chat.

ELIAS: You are very welcome my dear friend. And remember, I’m always with you.

JIM: I’ll have to look for that blue dot. I haven’t seen it lately.

ELIAS: (laughs) For I am present whether you are being present or not. (laughs)

JIM: Okay.

ELIAS: I express my affection to you my dear friend and tremendous encouragement in your adventures and your investigations. (chuckles)

JIM: Thank you very much, Elias.

ELIAS: To you in great lovingness and tremendous appreciation, au revoir.

JIM: Au revoir.

---

Copyright 2006 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.