Saturday, July 29, 2006 (Private/Phone)

Participants: Mary (Michael) and Jim S. (Bevan)

ELIAS: Good morning!

JIM: Well, good morning, Elias. It’s strange to talk to you in the morning. [Elias laughs] Usually it’s afternoon. It occurs to me that Muriel might prefer the name, Melody to her given name. Is that the case?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I thought maybe. Does Melanie Loach belong Sumafi?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Alright, now, instead of Kevsky, for my focus Ivan, the tenor who sang in the premier performance of Rimsky-Korsakov’s “Le Coq D’Or” is his surname Nevinsky or Kevinsky or something like that?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. Which one? Kevinsky?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: On four individuals, I have the same essence name for both belonging to and aligning with and I don’t think that’s right. Could you straighten me out on these? John L. Lewis/Rasheid, I have him both belonging to and aligned Vold. Does he belong Vold and align Sumafi?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Madeline Aubergier/Anne, I have her both belonging to and aligned Sumari. Does she belong Sumari and align Vold?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Claude Montcrief/Wynnuza, I have him both belonging to and aligned Zuli. Does he belong Zuli and align Milumet?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Tully Simms/Jene, I have him both belonging to and aligned Vold. Does he belong Vold and align Zuli?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Alright. Instead of Stendahl, is Lillian’s surname Stengel, as in Casey Stengel?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: How many focuses does Michella have in this dimension?

ELIAS: One thousand two hundred eighty-one.

JIM: One, two, eight, one. How many of those are contemporary?

ELIAS: Six.

JIM: Six?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: How many lives do Bevan and Michella share in this dimension?

ELIAS: Eighty-nine.

JIM: Eighty-nine! Wow! In how many of those lives is the relationship intimate?

ELIAS: In different capacities, all of them.

JIM: Okay. (chuckles). Alright. Is my sister a focus of Patmae?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: No? May I have her essence name then, please?

ELIAS: Essence name Dukiu (duke you) D-U-K-I-U.

JIM: D-U-K-I-U?

ELIAS: Yes

JIM: Thank you. How many focuses are shared with Bevan?

ELIAS: Fifty-six.

JIM: Five six. Does she belong Tumold?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Align Ilda?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Political focus?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Is one of the girls purchased and used by Antonius a focus of Patmae?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: In a dream, did I tune in to his initial use of her?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Did I create that dream in order to call my attention to the focus that is my sister?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I believe my focus count has exceeded fifteen hundred by this time frame. Has it?

ELIAS: Yes. You are correct.

JIM: Is it 1501?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: It is 1501. Are five of those contemporary?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Do these figures apply to the probable dimension from which I switched in accessing Mirabelle?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: No. I didn’t think so. The way Amelia Earhart’s name catches my attention, I suspect that either she is a focus of mine or I am observing essence of her. Is that the case?

ELIAS: Observing, yes.

JIM: Observing. Is she a focus of Takkita?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: No. I guess not. May I have her essence name, please?

ELIAS: That has been offered and before you asked that.

JIM: Alright. We’ll see (unintelligible). Is the woman whose picture I have labeled “Ah!” named Rhoda Long?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She is a focus of Zelda. Did her life and Caroline Miller’s life overlap?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. Does she align Zuli?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Was she named Rhoda as a pun in the way that Ima Hogg got her name?

ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, yes.

JIM: Does she live in or near Los Angeles?

ELIAS: Near.

JIM: Near?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is the woman whose picture I have labeled, “Monkeying” named Alicia or Alice Allman or Tallman? I get this confused with my focus Alicia Long. I’m sure I did, but I think this name is Tallman. Am I right?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: I believe that she lives in London, England. Does she?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is she a focus of Cuit?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. Align Zuli?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Do I have another picture of her labeled “Pretzel?”

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Does she do or teach gymnastics as a profession?

ELIAS: Teach.

JIM: Teach. I suspect that I have some relationship to Spartacus. Is he a focus of mine?

ELIAS: Observing and counterpart.

JIM: Is my emotional reaction to Rachmaninoff’s symphonic rendition of Poe’s poem, “The Bells,” influenced by my observing essence relationship to Rachmaninoff or do I have some connection to Edgar Allen Poe, or both?

ELIAS: Both.

JIM: Both. Am I observing or creating essence of Edgar Allen Poe?

ELIAS: Observing.

JIM: Observing. I finally got around to checking a focus that you confirmed. In this case, I found a web site which listed defenders of the Alamo. Randolf Parsons’ name was not on the list, yet you confirmed that he died during the siege of the Alamo. You already told me that approximately 1/3 of my focus information derives from probable dimensions other than the one of which I am aware. Did Red Parsons die during the Alamo siege in a probable dimension other than the one in which the web site list was prepared?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. That explains that. I’ve been trying to figure out the significance of a name. The name of a person can be thought of as a symbol for that person, can’t it?

ELIAS: Yes (questioningly)

JIM: That symbol, once created, remains a symbol for that person beyond disengagement and transition, doesn’t it?

ELIAS: Yes, and is an element of identity.

JIM: Right. A person’s identity tone is unique but a name symbol is not. Is there some sort of tie-in between identity tone and name symbol?

ELIAS: Yes, for it is expressed in a particular vibrational quality that is (unintellible) with the energy of the individual. You are correct that a name may not necessarily be what you would term as unique in that many individuals can incorporate the same name…

JIM: Yeah.

ELIAS: … or the essences can interpret a tone that translates into the same name, but the vibrational quality of that name in association with the individual is unique to that individual.

JIM: Right. That’s kind of the way I figured. Yes. Well that’s all I have today, Elias. I figured a short session here. I thank you very much for your attention and help.

ELIAS: You are very welcome, my friend, as always. And, as you are aware, I am always available to you.

JIM: Yes, I know you’re around.

ELIAS: (laughs) I express great encouragement to your discoveries and adventures, my friend. (chuckles)

JIM: Thank you very much, Elias.

ELIAS: To you in great appreciation and affection, my friend, au revoir.

JIM: Au revoir.

---

Copyright 2006 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.