Stepping into a Different Reality: Part 10
Topics:
“Change in Direction that Created a New Probable Self”
“Fusion Energy”
“Female and Male Energies”
“Surface People and Thinkers”
“Deliberate Harm to the Body by the Subjective and Objective Awarenesses”
Tuesday, July 1, 2025 (Private/Phone)
Participants: Mary (Michael) and Nuno (Lystell)
ELIAS: Good afternoon!
NUNO: Hello, my friend.
ELIAS: (Laughs) And what have you been engaging?
NUNO: All kinds of things. Well, not really. I’ve been engaging Julius.
ELIAS: Ah! And how is that proceeding?
NUNO: I don’t really know. I mean, sometimes I get an assessment of that and I feel that it went really well. It’s all based on how I feel afterwards and what my experience is after, because I can’t remember what actually occurs because I fall asleep. And sometimes afterwards I have a feeling that it went very well and there was progress made. Other times I just have a feeling I’m not sure if anything happened. And that’s where I am with that.
ELIAS: Very well. And I would say that similar to dreams with another essence, generally people don’t remember objectively what was discussed in the dream but they have assimilated it anyway. Therefore that is likely a part of it.
NUNO: Okay. Well, I was going to—
ELIAS: Why—
NUNO: Sorry. Continue.
ELIAS: Continue.
NUNO: I was going to discuss that with you, or just ask the question, what exactly is happening with my interactions with Julius and whether progress is being made in that, because I don’t have any objective information on that.
ELIAS: I understand. I would say that it is actually moving forward. It’s simply a matter of you don’t always recall what the interaction has been, but that doesn’t mean that it’s not moving forward.
NUNO: Okay. Well, that’s good. I have a number of what I think are fairly simple questions. So I’d like to run through those first, before we get into the more in-depth subjects, if that’s okay?
ELIAS: Yes.
NUNO: Here’s an easy question. Am I the original self that was born into this reality or am I a probable self of that original self?
ELIAS: Ah! (Pause) Yes. You are the original self that was born into this reality.
NUNO: That was my impression. Thank you. Is Samantha, is she Milumet-aligned? [See Note 1]
ELIAS: Yes.
NUNO: Ah! I got that one right, too. Nailed it! You know, that’s a really nice pairing with me because of my Gramada, and it’s going to be something that is… I think will be very helpful to me, that she is Milumet.
ELIAS: And why else would you say that?
NUNO: Why else would I say that?
ELIAS: Simply in… Yes, other than the complement to the Gramada, simply in curiosity.
NUNO: I was reading about Milumet. I gave myself the impression that it was Milumet because I asked myself what the alignment was. And then I went to read what you had said about Milumet, and when I read it I thought there’s definitely a lot of characteristics to that essence family that are of interest to me. And so that’s what brought me to say that.
ELIAS: Very well. And in that, does… Do you feel a sense of comfort?
NUNO: Because of that?
ELIAS: Not necessarily because of that, but with that essence.
NUNO: I believe so, yes. I have not interacted with that essence very much at all actually. I observed the focus quite a bit and in my observations of the focus I feel very comfortable.
ELIAS: Excellent.
NUNO: Okay. Then my next question is: is the eagle my essence animal?
ELIAS: Yes.
NUNO: I kind of thought so. I saw two of them yesterday. They were male and female. And had it been a dream—
ELIAS: Quite majestic creatures, aren’t they?
NUNO: They are very majestic and I feel a connection with them, which led me to ask that question. They are very majestic indeed.
Okay. So here is one thing that was left from the last session. Why was a new probable self created recently, my most recent one?
ELIAS: Because you made a significant step in your movement in relation to your goal and in your interplay with other essences, that changed your reality and it changed your direction.
NUNO: Because of the interplay with essences?
ELIAS: Yes. With the intention, with the intention that you have. Not simply that you’re interplaying with other essences. You could do that at any point in time and many, many people do. But with the intention that you have and including other essences and interplaying with them, that is a significant life change.
NUNO: That’s very interesting because I didn’t think that kind of a choice would merit a probable self to be created.
ELIAS: I understand, but it does.
NUNO: Who decides whether a probable self is created or not? You’re going to tell me I do, subjectively.
ELIAS: (Laughs) You are correct. You.
NUNO: (Laughs) All right. (Elias laughs) What are my lines of energy right now?
ELIAS: Meaning?
NUNO: Well, I don’t know what that means. You’re the one that told me about that some time ago, meaning what directions I’m going in.
ELIAS: Ah.
NUNO: You explained to me what that meant and I forget exactly what you said.
ELIAS: In relation to direction, I’d say you’ve narrowed that tremendously. What that means, people generally have many directions at the same time. They may have ten or fifteen lines of direction at the same time, meaning their interests, their goals, their importances and their interactions. And in that, at this point you narrowed that considerably to streamline your attention in, for the most part, one direction.
NUNO: Mm. That’s pretty much what I’ve been trying to do, yes.
ELIAS: And I would express that you are accomplishing that.
NUNO: Okay. Great. I want to ask about some things about Nova and the way that I’ve configured it. I’ve got a number of these questions. The first one is about fusion power. [See Note 2]
And I’ve asked you about this before and you said that yes, it’s realistic, but somebody brought to my attention a discussion you had quite some time ago with somebody about fusion power in the future. And I think that discussion was centered about the year 2050 and what you said was that that yes, fusion power would become used as a source of energy in that timeframe but only for a while, because then it would be replaced by something more efficient. I can definitely understand that because currently fusion power, where technology stands, it’s completely… It’s not even useable, I think. It’s barely break-even. And I can see that in maybe twenty-five years some progress has been made, but likely not enough to make it very efficient or highly efficient. But my thinking is that even if that occurs, what you’ve said, that research into fusion power would still continue, and eventually there would be—
ELIAS: Yes.
NUNO: — a breakthrough through that would allow it to be much more efficient.
ELIAS: I would agree, but I would say that how it will be much more efficient will be in coupling it with other sources of power.
NUNO: Ah, okay. Because you did mention in that discussion things like taking energy out of a crystal.
ELIAS: Correct.
NUNO: Okay. That’s fine. I don’t need to know in detail how it works, and probably won’t know until I get there. That’s fine. I just didn’t want to put something that was limiting the reality to that, when it could have been using something even better.
ELIAS: Correct. I understand.
NUNO: The way I see it is that fusion is actually pretty good. It’s a very clean source of energy. The fuel is virtually inexhaustible. And it’s what’s powers the universe, so it seems like a good thing to do. But I also can see that in the distant future, the energy could simply come out of nowhere, because it’s ultimately… The energy is provided by us.
ELIAS: Correct.
NUNO: But I don’t think that’s realistic for that timeframe, probably.
ELIAS: (Chuckles) I agree.
NUNO: (Chuckles) Okay. All right. Then moving onto the next subject, the female energy in Nova. In terms of percentage, I would like to see a very high percentage of female energy in Nova, just generally for—
ELIAS: And how would you define that?
NUNO: How would I define that? Well, (chuckles) less male energy. (Chuckles) I don’t know. I mean, I’d define it in terms that I understand presently, in this reality, in terms of—
ELIAS: And that’s what I’m asking you. How would you define what you’re hoping to see in that future reality?
NUNO: Well, it kind of depends. If the male energy was similar to what it is here, which it isn’t, I would say I really, I would like to have the female energy very high, like ninety percent or something. But if the male energy is something different, then it would be acceptable to have more male energy. Do you understand what I am saying?
ELIAS: That still would lead myself in the direction of asking you how you define the difference of the female and the male energies.
NUNO: Well, you’re the one who has expressed what the female energy, that the female energy is—
ELIAS: I understand. I understand, but I’m asking you what your definition is of what you want to see.
NUNO: Well, generally what I want to see, I don’t want the competitiveness that is prevalent—
ELIAS: Ah.
NUNO: — with the male energy here.
ELIAS: That’s what I’m asking.
NUNO: But not just competitive, the violent aspect. I think a lot of the violence stems from the male energy.
ELIAS: A lot of it, but not all.
NUNO: Not all, but…
ELIAS: But I understand. and I would say that you’re correct that in that future time, the energy is very different and there isn’t that factor. I wouldn’t say that it is eradicated entirely because the factor of competition is still in play in relation to games and entertainment, but not in relation to (pause) industry or (pause) production or land.
NUNO: Okay. I understand. What about interpersonal competition?
ELIAS: That would be limited to games. And yes, other than that it wouldn’t be something that would be engaged in what you would term to be normal situations.
NUNO: Okay. Well, I would like to see seventy-five percent female as being the typical.
ELIAS: In relation to what you identify as the female energy by behavior, I would say that it would be close to that, yes.
NUNO: What about separation? And I mean separation—
ELIAS: What about it?
NUNO: Separation between the objective and the subjective. Now you have expressed to one person that in that reality they are able to direct the subjective with the same ease that they can direct the objective.
ELIAS: Correct.
NUNO: Which is extremely attractive. What I’d like to do is reduce the separation to as little as possible, really, actually, is what I’d like to do. Ideally zero separation, although I know you’re going to say that’s not realistic.
ELIAS: mm… It depends. I would say that some people in that future time framework do achieve that. Not everyone. But I would say that that is also a matter of choice, a matter of importances, what people choose as being important to them, or most important to them, and that would influence their choice of what they pursue. And in relation to what they pursue, I would say that some people do achieve that. No separation between the objective and subjective awareness, and merge it so much that it is one. When I say merge, I don’t mean in a physical sense, I mean in a sense of attention. That it’s all one and there is no difference.
NUNO: Okay. That’s… That’s quite acceptable to me. I mean obviously it is a choice and there is going to be considerable variation from person to person and I just wanted a sense that it was achievable, that just generally it is considerably reduced from what we have in this reality.
ELIAS: Yes. Because you in this reality are just beginning to move in a direction of recognizing that subjective awareness and the importance of beginning to learn how to be aware of it and how to access it.
NUNO: And I have inserted that in Nova they are very aware of their interconnectedness, that this is something that—
ELIAS: Yes.
NUNO: Yes, it’s… It’s pretty much universal.
Also there is no religion, not a whiff of it, and that’s kind of a hard requirement for me. It’s gone. I don’t see any need for it, for one thing.
ELIAS: I would say in your version, you’re correct.
NUNO: In my version?
ELIAS: Because that’s what you’ve… that what’s you’ve, in probable versions—
NUNO: That’s the version—
ELIAS: It would be different.
NUNO: Okay, that’s fine. I don’t really care what they do elsewhere. (Both laugh) But this is a very important subject for me, because in my perspective religion has played such a prominent role in this reality when it comes to oppression, wars, as a means of asserting power over other people. It’s a mess. I really—
ELIAS: I understand.
NUNO: And I understand also that there are potentially some benefits to it. But the downside… I mean, even today you still see the religious wars. People are still killing themselves and starting wars purely on the basis—
ELIAS: I agree.
NUNO: And so, I don’t want to—
ELIAS: I agree.
NUNO: Okay. Well, all right. Anyway.
ELIAS: Land and religion. Those are two of the largest reasons for war.
NUNO: Exactly. Okay. That’s good. Anyway, so that’s settled. Sexuality in Nova. Is it expressed differently than it is in this reality? I imagine it would be, but maybe you can briefly go into that.
ELIAS: Yes. It is. There is much more allowance. It’s something that the allowance of that expression of sexuality is so considerable that people don’t actually think about it. In like manner to, until recently, most of the population didn’t think about themself in relation to sexuality. You accepted, for the most part – remember, there are considerable exceptions to this, as you are aware now – but I would say that most of the population moved in a direction of simply accepting their sexuality in relation to their gender, and didn’t think about it. Now that has changed, and in the future sexuality is something that people don’t necessarily identify with their physical gender.
NUNO: Interesting.
ELIAS: They don’t necessarily have part of their identity associated with a physical gender. Because at that time they recognize that physical gender is what you choose it to be, not simply what you are born into this reality with.
NUNO: Okay. Well that’s good. That sounds more or less along the lines with---
ELIAS: Yes. Because that doesn’t hold, it doesn’t hold a charge to it any longer as it does now.
NUNO: Right. Exactly. Okay. All right. That’s all good. Communicating with animals. I expect that this does occur with more ease in Nova?
ELIAS: Oh yes. Definitely. Because it is taken more seriously, that it is something that can be expressed. That actually comes from (pause) many studies that have begun now and then have continued in the future, that have been expressed with marine animals in relation to whales primarily and then dolphins secondarily. But from that, that has prompted the studies and the acceptance of the concept that it is possible to interact and communicate with animals, not simply whales and dolphins.
NUNO: Yes. And there is one family of consciousness which actually has a particular ease with that?
ELIAS: (Pause) Yes. And your impression?
NUNO: Oh. I was just reading about this the other day. Was it Tumold? I’m not getting an impression. I’m just trying to recall what I read. So it might have been Milumet. I’m not sure. I’m doing very well here.
ELIAS: (Chuckles) I would say that Milumet does have a, in a manner of speaking, special bond with animals.
NUNO: What about surface people? You haven’t actually talked very much about that. I just happened to hear about this from somebody else, and it’s a subject that’s of interest to me because – this is going to sound pretty biased, but I don’t really like… Well, that’s not true. I think I do get along with surface people to an extent. My concern is this, is that in this reality, because there are so many of them and because of the political environment and because of everything else that is going on here, they actually cause problems for society because they move in directions that, without even thinking about it they just do whatever is popular, whatever they hear on the radio, whatever they see on the internet. They don’t have to think about it: “Oh, well let’s just do that!” And I think, and because it’s 75% of the population is like that, it’s not really good. I would prefer to have much… Really, what I’m asking about is I would like to have a much lower percentage of surface people. I know you’ve said it was a choice, but is this the choice that’s made before or after they’re born?
ELIAS: Before.
NUNO: Before. Hm. So what have you got to say about that?
ELIAS: I would say somewhat of the opposite of your observation. I would say if you had a considerably larger percentage of thinkers, it’s very likely that you would have more conflict.
NUNO: In this reality?
ELIAS: And it’s—
NUNO: Just—
ELIAS: Yes.
NUNO: Okay. Go ahead.
ELIAS: And it’s also something that one of the qualities of thinkers is that they think and they ponder and they evaluate and they keep exploring in directions of their interest. But in that, if there were a large percentage of thinkers there would not be a large percentage of people to implement the directions that they’re discovering. I would say that let us take an example such as railroads. You have very few individuals that are conceiving of the idea and that are developing the design. This can be applied to technology now. But using the example of railroads, you have these few people that are thinkers that are acting on inspirations of invention, and developing the design of their inspiration, but those people are not the people that actually put it together. They simply invent it. They don’t actually implement what they have invented. Therefore in practical application, if you had a large population of thinkers, you would have many individuals that are yes, very consumed with what they’re doing and therefore not interested in creating wars, but you likely would not achieve much because you wouldn’t have the individuals that are inspired and excited about what you have invented and therefore are willing to create it or implement and therefore generate the inspiration into reality. Do you understand?
NUNO: I do understand. I tend to disagree a little bit with that. I would say that many inventors, well, perhaps not many but often the inventor does actually take the next step and does things to actually make it real, to implement it. It may not be that they directly implement it, but they would do things like form a company, hire individuals and do things like that.
ELIAS: Precisely.
NUNO: Yeah. Okay.
ELIAS: They could.
NUNO: Okay. Okay. But my interest in this is not in this reality. My interest is in Nova, and Nova is a very different society. And in that society, one of the key things is the degree of automation, the degree of A.I. that’s used and the robotics and all of that makes some of this actually not so important, because labor is basically free.
ELIAS: I understand. And that is a very different reality.
NUNO: I understand what you’re saying. It is a perspective I didn’t appreciate for sure. But I’m wondering in Nova though, would it be possible to have more thinkers without—
ELIAS: Yes.
NUNO: It would? Okay.
ELIAS: Correct. Yes. You could.
NUNO: All right. What would be reasonable?
ELIAS: As a percentage?
NUNO: Yeah, of thinkers.
ELIAS: I would say what would be reasonable would be 45 to 50%.
NUNO: That’s very good. Yeah. I mean I would kind of expect that in that kind of society. It would be something that can be more productive in a sense, that the thinkers… Because people will have so much free time, because they aren’t concerned about every day, mundane things, they have robots to do all that and so much of it is automated, and that’s the whole point, is for people to be creative. It frees them to be creative. It frees them to pursue what they really want to do instead of being concerned about working at a day job doing things that they probably would rather not be doing. Anyway, okay. That’s excellent.
All right. So, here’s the question of the day. (Elias laughs) I’ve been avoiding asking you this for some time because it’s potentially a bit controversial and (Elias laughs) this literally keeps me up at night. I mean, there’s very few things that keep me up at night but this is, this is it. This is the one that keeps me up at night.
So here is the question: Is it correct that the subjective awareness deliberately harms the body at times because this is in the blueprint for this reality?
ELIAS: (Pause) I will express yes with a qualification, expressing that the objective awareness does that also at times.
NUNO: Yeah, I would agree with that, but I really don’t want to get into all the reasons why.
ELIAS: That’s acceptable, but I would, I would express yes.
NUNO: Okay. Well, that’s good because I got that information actually from Tingua and I really like Tingua. I mean she is so open with me. Okay. So I mean obviously I don’t care a whole lot what goes on in this reality much more, but in Nova can that be changed?
ELIAS: It doesn’t need to be changed, because there IS no separation.
NUNO: Yeah. That’s very true. That’s very true. And I’m kind of… I mean, that’s what I was going to say next. That’s good, because this is something that bothers me to no end. It’s just… Okay, let’s not go into it because it’s a very hot subject with me and I don’t need to waste—
ELIAS: Very well.
NUNO: — any more time on it. Somebody else should. I will just say this: somebody else in this reality should pursue this subject with you. I would really encourage them to do that.
ELIAS: Very well.
NUNO: But I don’t think this is something that I want to talk about right now.
Okay, about increased brain utilization. We did talk about that last time, and you said what it does is it increases the number of grooves in the brain and all that, but really my question was: what effect does that have on the individual? I mean, does it increase memory? What does it do?
ELIAS: It does. It increases clarity. It increases your ability to take in and retain information, more information, and to access that information easily.
NUNO: Okay. That kind of is along the lines of what I thought.
ELIAS: If you think about information that you take in, think about school. There’s a lot of information that is given to you in school over the years, and a lot of it you either don’t retain or it’s difficult for you to access if you do retain it. You have certain points, generally speaking points that you’re interested in, that you can easily access. But other than that, you generally don’t. In Nova, with the increase of usage of the brain you can take in all that information, retain it and access it easily, just as easily as you can access the memories of your experiences.
NUNO: Okay. That sounds excellent, and I understand what you’re saying.
And the next question I have is: in Nova, how are scarce resources allocated? This is something I have not been actually able to figure out. In a reality like this one where there’s money, it’s very easy. You just raise the price of something and it becomes less affordable and so it’s kind of… There’s an automatic way to control the demand for things. But in Nova, there’s no money. And so part of the answer is that the people are much more interconnected so they are aware and they are not likely to go in the direction of wanting to hoard things and do things of that nature. But still, it could happen that there are things that are either difficult or hard to manufacture or to obtain. Can you enlighten me on this?
ELIAS: What is it that you actually want to know about those things that are more difficult to obtain?
NUNO: Well nothing about the thing itself. I want to know how they are allocated. In other words, let’s say in this reality, let’s say blue diamonds, for example. Blue diamonds are pretty rare, I understand, and they are difficult to find and so there is a very limited supply of them. And people want them because they’re pretty and whatnot, and so everybody would like a blue diamond or a lot of people would, just because they are nice, but obviously that’s not going to happen because there’s much greater demand, potential demand, than there is a supply of them. So what happens is they’re very expensive and so that limits how many people can actually buy these things. The blue diamond is a really bad example for Nova, but… They’re probably not so concerned about things like that, but it would be—
ELIAS: No, I understand.
NUNO: But in Nova there might be some other thing. There might be, it could be a mineral resource. It could be there is not enough production of something. That kind of thing is what I’m… Or food. It could all, yeah typically this would be like with food. For example some foods, some vegetables or fruits, they might be seasonal and so when the growing season is finished they become rarer.
ELIAS: I understand. But also I would say that the attention and, in a manner of speaking, how you use the word, mentality is more entuned, let us say, with what is available and what is important.
Therefore there is a definite shift in relation to what is important and how that correlates with what people want. They don’t want as much of what is rare, because they, their perception or their attention, is not in the direction of making that as important. In your reality now, those things are important because of their rarity or because of their seasonal availability, because of money. Because the factor of money dictates to people what is important and therefore it dictates to people in many situations what they want. But I would also say that when the people are more entuned with the elements, then those things are valued in a balance. And in that, when people are more entuned with the elements and not distracted or dictated to by money, then it’s a very different society, let us say, in and throughout the world. They value what is important to them and for a reason, not simply because.
NUNO: I understand. And that’s… Yeah, I really understand. That makes a lot of sense to me.
ELIAS: Excellent.
NUNO: I think one of the things in this reality is it’s kind of a consumer culture that we have. People want to buy and consume things and they want to always have the newest thing. And if their neighbor has something that’s better, they want to have something that’s at least as good. It’s a very consumeristic kind of a mentality.
ELIAS: Yes I would agree, but I would also agree that that is driven a lot by money.
NUNO: Yeah, absolutely. Yeah.
ELIAS: Because the money generates status.
NUNO: It does. And that’s why it is so good to get rid of it. And I would say that once you get rid of money, things start to work much better, much more efficiently. And as a society it just develops much more quickly in directions that are more beneficial to it and to everybody. I think the money piece really is a big barrier to progress.
ELIAS: In some situations, I would agree. I would say that the reality without it is definitely different. It’s very different.
NUNO: Mm-hm. Well, that’s the reality I prefer.
ELIAS: I understand.
NUNO: Okay. Processed foods. You’ve been telling us that they’re not good, and I’d like to understand why. Recently you told somebody that if they bought their ground beef at the store already ground that that was processed food and therefore it’s not good but if they bought the meat whole and ground it up themselves and produced the ground beef that way, that was okay. So what is it that they do at the processing factory that is so bad?
ELIAS: Actually, it’s not. With that example of ground beef, generally speaking the individual stores grind their own beef, but you don’t know what’s in it. You don’t know all the different cuts of meat that are being put in it. You don’t know what type of fat is being put in it. And in that, that is the difference. There may be ingredients in that ground beef that are not necessarily healthy for you. And in that, even though they are now required to give you a percentage of fat content in the packaging of that meat, you still don’t know precisely what that is, because what they’re actually doing is giving you an estimate of the percentages.
In this, I would say also at times that they may not even been entirely grinding beef. For the most part, they are, but it can happen that other cuts of meat will be thrown into that grinder and you don’t know. But you do know if you do it yourself.
Now; I understand that that is a lot of your own time and effort and that a lot of people won’t do it. I’m simply giving you information and you can do with it what you will. In that, many individuals will ignore it and will continue to buy processed foods. And what I will say to you is that it’s not healthy, but I would say that that’s also each individual’s choice. It’s not a matter of listening to your body. It’s a matter of convenience and taste.
NUNO: I reviewed carefully the information you provided at the end of our last session having to do with giving up on this personality and this self. And the first thing is, that piece about it being not just about the physical parts about the body, and it being also about the personality and the identity, that was something that I hadn’t considered. But when I did consider it, I decided that it doesn’t bother me at all. Actually, I think it’s good that I get a new personality because this one has got some flaws in it that I definitely would like to get rid of. And going to Nova is definitely about a new start, so I think it’s only appropriate that I have a new identity and a new personality. So that is something that doesn’t trouble me at all.
But in terms of the other question, which is, was how to actually let go or give up, I mean the difficulty with giving up is that I’m… Like with a project, when you give up on a project you just walk away. Then you forget about it. You can’t actually do that quite so easily with this. So what I’ve been telling myself is that it’s pointless and futile to continue.
ELIAS: I would say that that is efficient, and that I would say that that is something that you could actually use as a mantra.
[The timer for the end of the session rings]
NUNO: And I have been, actually. Okay. I’m glad it meets your approval. (Both laugh) Okay.
Have you got any parting words of wisdom for me?
ELIAS: (Chuckles) Parting words of wisdom. I would say for you, keep moving in the direction that you are. I would give you a suggestion to practice projecting to Nova.
NUNO: Okay. I don’t want to end up there physically.
ELIAS: No. But in a projection, you are moving in a direction of focusing your attention more in that direction.
NUNO: Okay. I will do that. That’s something easy for me to do.
ELIAS: Very well.
NUNO: Thank you so much.
ELIAS: You are so very welcome. And I express to you tremendous, tremendous love, my dear friend, and very much treasured friendship. Until our next meeting, in whichever reality it occurs (chuckles), I express such dear affection for you and will engage you soon. Au revoir.
NUNO: Au revoir.
(Elias departs after 59 minutes)
Note 1: Samantha is Nuno’s mother in Nova.
Note 2: For information on fusion power, reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power
Copyright 2025 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.