Thursday, March 9, 2006 (Private/Phone)

Participants: Mary (Michael) and Jim S. (Bevan)

ELIAS: Good afternoon.

JIM: Good afternoon, Elias. I just had a nice chat with Mary. (pause) Are you there?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Shall I proceed with my questions?

ELIAS: You may.

JIM: Alright. First thing is, is Joe Caruso a focus of Millio?

ELIAS: Counterpart.

JIM: Counterpart. Okay. Does essence Rosa belong Milumet?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. Does Jimon Cardinales align Vold?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Thought focused?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Alright. Is Rico Cardinales a focus of Anna, A-N-N-A?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: Beg your pardon?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: No? Alright. Does he align Ilda?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Alright. He is common orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: And thought focused?

ELIAS: Political.

JIM: Political. Alright. Is Loren Bitress a focus of Anne, A-N-N-E?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. Does he align Ilda?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Alright. Now, was I being intrusive when I attempted to present to Jackson’s parents information that I had gathered about him and about the Aubergier family?

ELIAS: (pause) And, what would be the motivation for you to be questioning in that manner?

JIM: Umm… I guess it was… my attempt was… uh… deflected, so I was wondering if I just put my foot in it trying to offer them information?

ELIAS: It is not a matter of being intrusive, but being aware of, umm, the other individual and the direction of other individuals and being aware of what information they may or may not be willing to receive…

JIM: Right.

ELIAS: … and also being aware of your self and what is motivating you to offer information in certain situations.

JIM: Right. Actually they’re creating their own reality and… I’m not going to create their reality for them.

ELIAS: Correct, and in that, being aware of your energy and your motivation in evaluating whether you are offering information to other individuals in a manner of instructing, or in a manner of attempting to present a validity in association with information that you offer to your self, as opposed to offering information in relation to your own knowing that another individual interprets a curiosity with respect to that information.

JIM: Alright. Well, let me go on from there. What was going on with essence name Anne, A-N-N-E during session 257 on January 11, 1998? Did you offer the essence name of A-N-N-E to Deidre or the essence name A-N-N-A to Deina?

ELIAS: Clarify your question.

JIM: I beg your pardon?

ELIAS: Clarify.

JIM: Clarify my question?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I found a… in one place… uh… the transcript and… uh… Gerhard’s web site show Session 257 listed as you being offered the essence name Anne, A-N-N-E to D-E-I-D-R-E, to Deidre and then when I went to check on that just a little while ago, I found in that Session 257 on my disc and also on Gerhard’s web site was now listed as you having offered Anna, A-N-N-A, to Deina, D-E-I-N-A. The only thing I can figure is that I switched probabilities.

ELIAS: Switching probabilities in what capacity?

JIM: I don’t know. I don’t know of any other explanation for that.

ELIAS: What precisely is your confusion?

JIM: Well, we have two different… two different Anns, Anne and Anna offered to… in the same session offered to two different people, and I don’t understand that.

ELIAS: Let me express to you…

JIM: I beg your pardon.

ELIAS: In… um… what you term to be early session, I expressed an identification of an essence name of Joseph to an individual that was participating in the early session. Subsequently there was confusion for other individuals expressed their association that the essence name, Joseph, meant that this individual was another focus of the partner of the individual that engaged the energy exchange with Seth. Now, I explained I that may offer the translation of a tone which configures into a name and it may be offered for more than one individual and not be the same essence.

JIM: That doesn’t explain what I discovered here. Because I’m talking about one single session and two different people… that you offered essence names to two different people. I don’t understand that.

ELIAS: The same essence name. It is…

JIM: Not the same.

ELIAS: …two different essence names to two different individuals.

JIM: That is correct.

ELIAS: And what is your confusion with that?

JIM: I can’t how I can… I can’t see how I could learn about that difference, that anomaly, without changing probable paths… switching from one probable self to another. Now, did I do that?

ELIAS: We are not talking of the same essences.

JIM: Um…

ELIAS: There…

JIM: I know we’re not… we’re not talking of the same essences. No, I know that. We’re talking about two different people.

ELIAS: Correct, and two different essences.

JIM: Two different essences. That is correct.

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: But in 257, only one name was offered to one person, and I am finding that two names have been offered to two people in the same session. So I don’t… Alright, let’s go on from there, alright? We’re not going to settle that.

Now let’s see. Do I… When, in my session of 12/8/2005, I asked you if my contemporary focus count had changed from four, and you said, “No, but that is a potential.” Subsequent to that, I attempted to write a story about Mirabelle Delacroix and found that I was unable to write her story. Nothing I wrote felt right to me. Then, in thinking about that potential addition to my contemporary focus count, I wondered if that potentiality involved Mirabelle and, for this session, I prepared a question asking if I had a future focus named Mirabelle Delacroix and associated with that question, prepared a number of questions involving impressions I had about her, based on the failed story that I had written. In preparing those questions, did I shift awareness to a probable reality in which Mirabelle existed?

ELIAS: Yes!

JIM: I did. Okay. I have a feeling that there also exist one or more probable realities in which she does not exist. Is that the case?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Did I shift from one of those probable realities in which Mirabelle does not exist?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I did. Was this awareness shift responsible for the oddity that I turned up with regard to essence Anne?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Okay. Now that explains that. In probable dimensions where Mirabelle exists, is she a black girl?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: And she is a focus of mine, a future focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Whose life may overlap mine for a short period?

ELIAS: It is a potential, but very briefly.

JIM: That’s what I figured, very briefly. Okay. Born on the island of Martinique?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: In or near La Trinité?

ELIAS: Near, yes.

JIM: Near. I get that her mother either died soon after her birth or abandoned her. Is that the case?

ELIAS: Disengaged, yes.

JIM: Disengaged. Okay. Did she suffer… did Mirabelle suffer a period of lack of care during which she was quite hungry and dirty?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I see her subsequently being cared for by a couple named Etienne and Sonia Soldier. Does that happen?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Etienne is a focus of Wynnuza?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: He aligns Gramada?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Thought focused?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Sonia is a focus of Liephio?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Aligns Borledim?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Political focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Mirabelle is known by and prefers the nickname Miri?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Does she allow an entity to make available through her, concepts designed to help individuals learn to use latent abilities freed through the action of the shift in consciousness?

ELIAS: Yes, you are correct.

JIM: Is that entity Allaine?

ELIAS: That is what she identifies it as.

JIM: She identifies it. Okay. Through Etienne and Sonia, do Wynnua and Liephio assist as part of a gestalt action in making these concepts available?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Does Mirabelle align Milumet?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Intermediate orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I still don’t trust my impressions, and this business with Mirabelle is a good example. I do recognize that my beliefs and preferences distort the information to some extent. Your corrections and “No” answers have made that clear. Intellectually, I accept that my impressions represent an acceptance of inner sense information, but underneath there seems to remain doubt. Apparently I still honor the belief that nothing as nebulous as an impression can be valid information. Is that the case?

ELIAS: That would be accurate.

JIM: Accurate (Elias laughs)

ELIAS: But, I am acknowledging of you for you allow yourself to pay attention and you are trusting those impressions more than you have previously.

JIM: Yes. Well, thank you. Alright. I get the essence name Hassan, H-A-S-S-A-N, as one whose focuses that share lives with Allaine’s focuses. Is that a valid impression?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is one of those focuses named Daniel Vickers?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: How many focuses do Allaine and Hassan share?

ELIAS: Forty-three.

JIM: Forty-three, a good number. When I asked you why I had picked up the name, Sorenson, you told me that I had generated the name in association with another focus. Is that focus named Marla Sorenson?

ELIAS: Marsha (emphasis on “sha”)

JIM: Marsha?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Okay. Is she a future focus of mine, born after Bo Ni but before Hermione Hess?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I get her in Leeds, England. Is that the location?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Does she teach ballet, perhaps among other things? I associate her with ballet somehow but don’t think that she has performed as a ballerina.

ELIAS: You are correct.

JIM: She aligns Sumari?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Intermediate orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Political focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She married… She is married to a Paul Sorenson?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: They have two children, a boy and a girl?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Paul works in communications of some sort?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is his essence name Anna?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: No?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: Alright. Does he align Sumafi?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Thought focused?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Okay. Do I have a future focus named Alicia Long?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Does she live in what I would consider the 25th century?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Does she align Ilda?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Thought focused?

ELIAS: Political.

JIM: Political. Does she team up with Becky Thorp for the purpose of effecting genetic changes in a time frame that is past in relation to their own?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Do they project fragments of their personalities for this purpose?

ELIAS: At times.

JIM: At times. Okay. Is Becky a focus of Anna?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: No?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: Alright. Does she… does Becky align Tumold?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Political focus?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Becky uses empathic impressions of individuals to create designs to assist in their healing?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Alright. Do I have a focus named Marissa Hopkins?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I get her in or near Birmingham, England, during World War Two. Is that accurate?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Was she in military service of some sort?

ELIAS: Associated with that, but not actually a part of the military services.

JIM: Okay. She was linked with the RAF in some manner?

ELIAS: Yes, but not actually in that service.

JIM: Kind of a hired help sort of thing?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Okay. Did she die as a result of a German bombing raid on Birmingham?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Does she align Milumet?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Alright. Do I have a focus named Thomas Jollen, J-O-L-L-E-N?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I got him as a lumberjack in Oregon in the late 1800s? Is that it?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: He later worked at a saw mill powered by a steam engine?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: The sawmill made railroad ties?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: That association of steam engine experience and railroad ties got him a job as railroad locomotive engineer?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: This was during the construction of the railroad which eventually became part of the Great Northern Railroad?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: He enjoyed being a locomotive engineer but accepted a supervisor position. Is that the case?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: He was later appointed division superintendent headquartered in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho?

ELIAS: Briefly.

JIM: I beg your pardon?

ELIAS: Briefly.

JIM: Briefly. Okay. Does he align Zuli?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Political focus?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: His wife is a Nez Percé woman named Blanche?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She is a focus of Poalite?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Aligns Ilda?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Common.

JIM: Common. Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: They have three children, two boys and a girl? (I misspoke the children. I should have said two girls and a boy. Elias answered my thought instead of my words.)

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: The younger girl is named Daisy?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She is a focus of Anna?

ELIAS: That would be an observing essence.

JIM: Ah. Alright. Does she align Borledim?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Intermediate focus? Intermediate! What am I saying intermediate for? No, no, no, no, no! (unintelligible) Now I… Let’s forget that one. (Elias laughs) The older girl is named Rose?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: She is a focus of Anne, A-N-N-E?

ELIAS: That would also be observing.

JIM: Observing.

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Aligns Vold?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: The boy is named Richard?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: He is a focus of Beauregarde?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: He is the youngest of the three children?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: He aligns Gramada?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Thought focused?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Do I have a focus who is a harpist?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Her name is Helga Rivers?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She played with the Cincinnati Symphony Orchestra?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: No?

ELIAS: That would be a confusion with a counterpart of this individual.

JIM: Ah ha! Okay. My life overlapped hers until she disengaged as a result of an automobile accident in 1974?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I beg your pardon?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. She aligns Sumari?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Was it her influence that drew Michelle Johanson’s picture to my attention?

ELIAS: Partially.

JIM: Partly. Is it her energy that I feel when I respond emotionally to harp solo passages in orchestral music?

ELIAS: Somewhat, yes.

JIM: Somewhat. I have a feeling that the story that I wrote that includes a Crow tribe naming ceremony is a translation of one or more events in the life of a focus of mine. Is that feeling valid?

ELIAS: Yes!

JIM: The name, Striking Owl, seems particularly significant in light of my use of the owl as a dream symbol. Yet I do not feel that is the name given to my focus. Is my focus the character, Placid Moon?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: No?

ELIAS: Yes!

JIM: Yes. Alright. Does she align Milumet?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Intermediate orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Religious focus?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Is her birth name Anya Fordson?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes or no?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Anya’s father’s name is Gregory, his Crow name Wounded Buffalo?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Is he a focus of Mubu?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes, no?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. Align Gramada?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: He’s an accountant and a tribal medicine man?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Anya’s mother’s name is Maryanne, Crow name Fleeting Doe?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She is a focus of Alliare?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes or no?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. Aligns Ilda?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Wounded Buffalo’s mother’s name is Sylvia, Crow name Flying Cloud?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She is a focus of Wynnuza?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Aligns Tumold?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She is a medicine woman and a psychic speaker for the tribe?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Hiding Fawn is the Crow name of Fawn Jameson?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She is a focus of Poalite?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Aligns Ilda?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She loses her university scholarship due to pregnancy?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: She meets and stays with Dave Ryder?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Dave is a focus of Liephio?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: No?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. He aligns Sumari?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Thought focused?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: He works for an airline?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: No?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: Alright. He is given… He is given the Crow name Striking Owl?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Dave works with a baggage handler… or works with… I’ll have to take out baggage handlers… it’s not an airline… works with a person named Howie Smith?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Howie is a focus of Anne, A-N-N-E?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: No or yes?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Aligns Zuli?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Intermediate orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: He meets and stays with Rosalie Feldman?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Rosalie is better known as Rosie?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She is a focus of Beauregarde?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Aligns Vold?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She and Fawn roomed together when attending the university?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She takes a job working with Dave and Howie after difficulties at the university?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Dave and Fawn rent an apartment from Lydia Lightfoot?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Lydia is a focus of Anna, A-N-N-A?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She aligns Milumet?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Intermediate orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Political focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Her Crow name is Laughing Fox?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. Through her, Wounded Buffalo draws Dave and Fawn to the naming ceremony?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I’m having difficulty coming up with a time frame for the meeting of these focuses. I believe that it lies somewhere between my disengagement and the end of the shift in consciousness. Is that about right?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes or no?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes. In my story, Flying Cloud gives a speaking that, while it does not mention the shift in consciousness directly, obviously concerns tribal preparation for it. Did she give such a speaking?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is my version fairly accurate?

ELIAS: Yes!

JIM: I have a feeling that Striking Owl is my symbol for essence in this dimension. Is that the case?

ELIAS: Yes. I would agree.

JIM: A strike would symbolize creation of a focus of attention in some time/space coordinate of this dimension?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: The concept of owl’s prey would symbolize experience gained through a created physical focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: The increasing number of focuses that Bevan creates in this dimension, is it… does that indicate an increasing ability on Bevan’s part to keep track of those focuses. Is that the case?

ELIAS: The essence does not incorporate difficulty in tracking focuses… focuses, but your allowing of yourself to be opening yourself and tapping into information of essence is a definite widening of awareness and allowance of yourself to be tapping into more information concerning yourself as essence and therefore allowing yourself to be tracking focuses more easily.

JIM: Okay. Alright. You confirmed that I am a continuing focus of Bevan. Is Amanda Cooper Bevan’s initiating focus in this dimension?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Yes?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is Senta Willings Bevan’s final focus in this dimension?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is she common orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Am I correct in assuming that there is an order between the initiating and final focuses that is dependent upon essence intent?

ELIAS: Partially, but not entirely.

JIM: Okay.

ELIAS: For that would somewhat discount the significance of the choice of the focuses themselves.

JIM: Ah. Alright. Well, does that order include focuses in other dimensions or are there different orderings for different dimensions?

ELIAS: It would be different in association with different dimensions.

JIM: Okay. I was… I’m rereading Sue Watkins’ book “Conversations with Seth” for the third or fourth time and I feel that I have some relationship with Sue. Am I observing essence of her?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is there a counterpart relationship as well?

ELIAS: Yes. You are correct.

JIM: In reading what you told Margot/Giselle about obstacles, it occurred to me that my obsession with Muriel might be considered an obstacle. Is that possible?

ELIAS: In what capacity?

JIM: I beg your pardon?

ELIAS: In what capacity?

JIM: Well, I don’t know. I don’t really understand what you meant by obstacles.

ELIAS: I would not necessarily express that your interest in Muriel would be an obstacle. It is a curiosity and it is an avenue in which you allow yourself to express a type of sensitivity and openness that you do not necessarily express in other situations or with other individuals.

JIM: Ah. Alright. While I feel what I would call fondness for a number of my focuses, what I feel for Muriel I would call love as you have defined it. Am I distorting my interpretation in this?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: Am I responding more to her energy than to her physical image?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Am I engaging in wishful thinking to feel that Muriel’s feelings about me are similar to what I feel about her?

ELIAS: Yes, but that is also understandable, for the other individual incorporates not as clear an awareness.

JIM: You confirmed my dream interpretation of entering post-disengagement transition with Muriel. Have we chosen, at that point, to continue our adventures together?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I have some questions about my focus, Senta Willings. Is she associated with an organization called Willings, Ltd.?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Does Willings, Ltd. operate an Earth orbiting factory/laboratory?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Do they specialize in growing crystals?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Does Senta perform something similar to crystallographic functions in the Oort cloud habitat?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I feel that she is objectively aware of me and is projecting energy to me in a manner similar to Madeline Kochs. Is she?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Does she help me in writing about the Oort cloud habitat events?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I see her as a lover of Rico Cardinales and sensing his death even though she was not present. Did that actually happen?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Subsequently, did she and Rico’s grandson, Jimon Cardinales, team up in development and manufacture of crystals used to sensitize ceramics in a manner that allowed the kind of empathic recording that Gail Winslow did?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I seem to have come upon another prison inmate who is attempting to understand the sort of material that you and Seth have provided. May I have an essence name for Michael Rios?

ELIAS: Essence name Rajheen (Rah dzeen) R-A-J-H-E-E-N.

JIM: R-O-J-H-E-E-N?

ELIAS: R-A

JIM: R-O?

ELIAS: A.

JIM: A. R-A. Okay.

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I believe he belongs Gramada, Is that the case?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Align Milumet?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Thought focused?

ELIAS: Political.

JIM: Political. He has drawn to himself books on Iceland and Norse mythology and I suspect that he has focuses that would account for that. Does he?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is he, for example, Eric the Red?

ELIAS: No, but is a comrade of that individual.

JIM: Ah. Okay. His creation of a copy of Seth’s “The Nature of Personal Reality” from trash indicates to me that he is ready to put that kind of information to use. Is that the case?

ELIAS: Beginning, yes.

JIM: Yes, beginning. That’s what I figured. How many focuses does he have in this dimension?

ELIAS: Numbering of focuses nine hundred seventy-seven.

JIM: Nine two seven?

ELIAS: Seven seven.

JIM: Nine seven seven?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Alright. How many of those are contemporary?

ELIAS: Five.

JIM: Five?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: How many does he share with Daniel?

ELIAS: Sixteen.

JIM: Sixteen. How many with me?

ELIAS: Twenty-three.

JIM: Twenty-three. Alright. Am I observing essence of Holly Simms?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is she a focus of Allaine?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: No. I believe that she is a future focus, contemporary with Marcia Mackerer. Is that the case?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is she a university chapel organist who teaches the pipe organ?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Did she at one time play the sousaphone, or is that impression bleed through from Otto Heisenmüller?

ELIAS: The latter.

JIM: The latter. Bleed through from Otto. She also plays the piano quite adeptly?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She aligns Sumari?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: I believe that she is influential in my fondness for pipe organ music. Is that the case?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: How many focuses do Allaine and Bevan share in this dimension?

ELIAS: Eighty-one.

JIM: Eight one. In my last chat with you, you confirmed that Henri Aubergier is a focus of Anna and that Madeline Aubergier is a focus of Anne. However, you also said that essence Anna and essence Anne did not both have focuses in the Aubergier family. Is this another case of different probable realities?

ELIAS: No. This is a situation of altering focuses.

JIM: Ah. Altering focuses.

ELIAS: Yes. Which can occur and is not uncommon, just as you can generate an addition or subtraction to the number of focuses that you incorporate. There is also a considerable fluctuation in focuses associated with observing essences. But as I have expressed previously, the role of the observing essence is the same as that of the directing essence and it is the choice of the focus which essence it shall be associated with as essence. And if the focus alters and chooses an observing essence to be the essence of that focus it can dramatically alter the numbering of focuses or the association of focuses for the focus continues to incorporate all of the focuses from the previous directing essence. Are you understanding?

JIM: I think so. I’m going to need the tape to go ahead with that, for sure. Um, let’s go on to Naomi Richter. When I said that I saw Naomi Richter in Costa Rica and asked you if that is where she lives, using the present tense of “live,” you corrected me using the past tense, “lived.” I don’t understand why you made that distinction since, if my impression saw here there, then it seems as though use of the present tense is correct with regard to my impression. Since she is a future focus in relation to my time frame, the distinction seems even odder. Could you clarify that for me?

ELIAS: Yes. For, um, you are correct in your assessment and you are correct in relation to your explanation with your impression, but also in that moment you were generating an association of permanence.

JIM: Ah, okay.

ELIAS: That she dwells in that location throughout what you would term to be the lifetime.

JIM: Ah.

ELIAS: And therefore you were generating a permanent association with that location with that focus and that particular focus does not reside in that location throughout the entirety of the focus.

JIM: Okay. Thank you.

ELIAS: You are welcome.

JIM: Is the woman whose picture I have labeled “Feelingful” named Joy Murchinson?

ELIAS: The surname is incorrect.

JIM: Surname incorrect?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Okay. I believe that she is a focus of Allaine. Is she?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Am I observing essence of her?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She lived in San Diego at the time that she made that movie?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: That was the only movie in which she participated professionally?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: She married a rancher and now lives in Arizona?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Two children, a boy and a girl?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She is aligned Zuli?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Soft orientation?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Emotional focus?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She enjoys ranch life and loves riding horses?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Her husband is aware of her movie performance?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: She likes classical music and is particularly fond of the music of the harp, although she does not play that instrument?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Okay. Is Joe Tuan a focus of Liephio?

ELIAS: Observing.

JIM: Observing. I think that I may be allowing Joshua Potter’s energy to influence my speech. The voice I refer to is loud and forthright while my normal voice is not, and the Maine accent isn’t something that I normally try to emulate. Am I allowing Joshua’s energy that kind of influence?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: I think Joshua’s wife’s name is Mary. Is it?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Since Joshua is a focus of mine and his wife is a focus of my wife, were Joshua and his wife influential in our coming to Maine in the first place?

ELIAS: Somewhat.

JIM: Somewhat. Okay. Running close to time here. Lets see what we’ve got. Okay. Alright. Is the woman in the shop where I buy cigarettes a focus of Wynnuza?

ELIAS: No.

JIM: No. Is her focus… her essence name one that I am aware of? She seems very familiar to me.

ELIAS: She is very familiar to you for you have incorporated many focuses with this individual.

JIM: Oh? Maybe I’d better ask for her essence name, then.

ELIAS: (Laughs) Essence…

JIM: You said she was not a focus of Wynnuza, right?

ELIAS: Correct. Essence name Takkita (Ta ki ta) T-A-K-K-I-T-A.

JIM: T as in Thomas, A-K-K-I-T-A?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Alright. Does she align Borledim?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Common orientation?

ELIAS: Correct.

JIM: Political focus.

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Does she belong Vold… off the top of my head.

ELIAS: Yes!

JIM: She does. Alright. Looking back, I can see where I have quite often accepted Red Parson’s energy. The imaginary pistol at my hip derives at least partly from Red, doesn’t it?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: Is Tully Simms involved there, also?

ELIAS: Yes.

JIM: While I have owned handguns continually since my military service, I have never owned a holster except for that makeshift thing I had in the Army. Is that my means of somehow separating my personality from Red’s?

ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, yes.

JIM: Okay. Alright, we’ve run out of time, Elias. Sorry to say that because I’ve enjoyed talking with you. (Elias laughs) And thank you very much for your help and your confirmations.

ELIAS: You are very welcome, my friend. I shall be anticipating our next meeting and I shall be offering my energy to you in encouragement in your investigations and adventures. (Chuckles)

JIM: Thank you very much, Elias.

ELIAS: (Elias laughs) To you in great appreciation and dear friendship, au revoir.

JIM: Au revoir.

---

Copyright 2006 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.