Session 1499

Tumold Alignment


“Tumold Alignment”
“Exposure and Vulnerability”
“Clarification of ‘Holding Your Attention in the Now’”

Monday, January 19, 2004 (Private)

Participants: Mary (Michael), Cat (Munya) and Mike (Alandra)

(Elias’ arrival time is 22 seconds.)

ELIAS: Good afternoon!

MIKE: Good afternoon.

CAT: Hello.

ELIAS: (Chuckles) And what shall we be discussing this day?

CAT: We can start out with the essence names, the family, alignment and orientation for both of us. We’ll start out with me, Cat.

ELIAS: Essence name, Munya, M-U-N-Y-A (MOON yah). And your impression as to essence families?

CAT: I think maybe Tumold and aligned with Zuli.

ELIAS: Reverse.

CAT: I’m aligned Tumold? Wow. (Elias chuckles) And orientation, maybe soft or common?

ELIAS: Common.

CAT: Could I ask for essence color and tone color? Is essence color related to the essence, and then you have a tone or focus color?


CAT: Would that be anything to do with the color of indigo?

ELIAS: Essence color.

CAT: That kind of shade?

ELIAS: Yes. And your impression as to your focus color?

CAT: Maybe in the green range?

ELIAS: Aqua.

CAT: Your turn.

MIKE: Essence name?

ELIAS: Essence name, Alandra, A-L-A-N-D-R-A (ah LAHND rah). And impression?

MIKE: Probably soft.

CAT: That’s for orientation. What about for family?

MIKE: Probably Tumold.

ELIAS: Alignment.

MIKE: Alignment Tumold and soft orientation?

ELIAS: Correct. And your essence family?

CAT: I have an impression.

ELIAS: Very well.

CAT: Ilda?

ELIAS: Ilda, correct.

CAT: Did you want to know your color?

MIKE: Probably blue, deep blue.

ELIAS: Focus color, navy. Essence color — your impression?

MIKE: Violet.

ELIAS: Plum.

MIKE: Close!

CAT: When you’re Tumold-aligned, doesn’t that mean you try to heal people rather than accept where they are? Say if they’re ill, don’t Tumold-aligned...?

ELIAS: Many times; not as a rule. There are many individuals that incorporate that type of direction in aligning with the Tumold, but that may be expressed in many different manners, not necessarily in conjunction with physical healing.

CAT: I thought maybe I was Tumold family because I have a tendency to let people be what they are, at least more so now than ever before. If someone’s sick, I have a tendency to allow them to be sick.

ELIAS: That is not contrary...

CAT: an alignment with Tumold?


MIKE: Would the alignments be more in reference to energy, rather than physical expression?

ELIAS: Not necessarily. Let me express to you that the family that you are belonging to and the family that you are aligning with are actually equal, so to speak, in their qualities that you express, but the aligning family in any particular focus appears more obvious. There are qualities that are underlyingly continuously expressed concerning your family that you are belonging to, but they are not necessarily as obviously expressed as the family that you align with.

Now; in association with the Tumold family as an alignment, as I have expressed, it is not always generated as an interest in actual physical healing or even what individuals term to be psychological healing. There may not necessarily be an overt expression or interest in that type of action.

The difference with an individual that is belonging to the Tumold family is that they naturally express a healing energy in conjunction with those types of expressions without actually overtly engaging an action such as a physician or a counselor. They naturally express those healing qualities in their energy, which is received and generates an affectingness with other individuals in different capacities, whether it be physical or psychological or in different types of expressions that you term to be emotional — which is not actually emotional. But those individuals in their energy, their presence naturally generates that type of action, and individuals that encounter them physically automatically allow that expression of energy and incorporate it themselves to be reconfiguring their own energy to be generating that action of healing, whether or not the individual belonging to the Tumold family incorporates that intention.

Now; in belonging to the Tumold family, in the qualities expressed in that belonging to, the individual does not generally — although at times this may be different also — but generally they do not express much of an objective interest in actual healing.

Now; in aligning with this family, there may or may not be an interest in actual physical manipulation of energy in relation to healing. But even if there is not an interest in the individual to be generating that type of an action, there is, as you have expressed, different expressions of perhaps merely an allowance and an understanding of this action of the natural state and the choices of each individual.

In that, you may, in engaging the qualities of this family, generate an understanding that many times individuals or even other expressions of consciousness — those expressions of consciousness that you term to be living — choose to be incorporating physical affectingnesses or other affectingnesses, and your allowance of that or your acceptance of that is another evidence of your alignment with this family, in recognition that this is a choice of the individual, and that it is not necessary to be fixed unless the individual expresses that type of request in helpfulness.

CAT: Does the Tumold family have anything to do with the Indigo Children that people are talking about or experiencing right now?


CAT: Is that a different phenomenon, or is that just us explaining something?

ELIAS: That is more accurate. It is you offering yourselves an explanation. In actuality, I have addressed to this subject matter previously and have explained to individuals (that) they are categorizing children.”(1)”;#1 They are noticing the expressions of small ones, and even individuals that you identify as adolescents and that which you recognize as young adults, in their allowance of themselves to be directing themselves and expressing themselves more freely. In actuality, this is associated with this shift in consciousness. It is not one group of small ones; it is all small ones.

In this time framework, those small ones that have chosen to be manifest in this century as it continues express more and more and more directedness of themselves and display more of their natural abilities and allow for the expression of their abilities, for they are being manifest in the objective movement of this shift in consciousness. But even those individuals that chose to be manifest within the latter time framework of your previous century have allowed more of their own expression in conjunction with the bulk of their manifestation, their focus, being expressed within the objective movement of this shift in consciousness, contrary to many other individuals that have incorporated more time framework within your previous century, which participated, for the most part, in the subjective movement of this shift in consciousness.

This is the reason that I am engaging conversation with many of you, for many individuals that have incorporated most of their focus within the subjective movement of this shift are incorporating somewhat more challenge in the objective understanding and application and allowance of themselves in relation to the movement of this shift. These small ones, it is unnecessary for them to be engaging conversation with myself for they are aware, although at times they do incorporate conversation with myself merely in playfulness and in friendship, but not necessarily to be receiving information, for they are already aware.

MIKE: Thank you.

ELIAS: You are quite welcome.

CAT: I guess I’ll keep going. I was wondering about certain phenomena I’ve had, and most recently, a lot of the blue flashes. What is it?

ELIAS: My energy.

CAT: That’s what I’ve read. I wasn’t sure. Do I just see them randomly? Sometimes I see it a lot, frequently throughout the day, every five seconds sometimes, and sometimes I only see it once a day or less. Should I be paying attention in the moment to what I’m thinking? Is it relevant to what’s going on in my mind at that time or what I’m creating?

ELIAS: Not necessarily. I may express to you that I incorporate this action with many individuals to allow them an actual evidence of my interaction and my presence in energy. At times it is merely a reinforcement to allow you a recognition physically that there is an actual reality in energy. But I may also express to you, at times I do incorporate more of a concentration of energy with different individuals as a signal — not necessarily to be paying attention to what you are thinking, but to be paying attention to what type of energy you are projecting and what you are actually doing.

CAT: Does this have anything to do with the bathtub that keeps coming on, by chance?

ELIAS: (Chuckles) THAT is not my energy!

CAT: We were supposed to have a session before on the 19th or 20th, and then we were supposed to have it on the 21st. We got up in the morning and the bathtub was going full blast, and we wondered if that had anything to do with you.

ELIAS: (Chuckles) No. This would not be my energy, but it is an energy that is quite familiar and known to me. This would be a playful and somewhat mischievous energy of an essence of Patel.

CAT: The bathtub does come on right in front of me, and then I turn it off and it comes on again, I turn it off and it comes on again. (Elias chuckles) I was wondering if it also has to do with what I’m creating in the moment. Someone mentioned that to me the other night, that maybe I should pay attention to what I’m doing or creating.

ELIAS: That particular action, no. That particular action is merely a mischievous playful energy, which this particular essence is quite renowned for. (Chuckles)

CAT: Does this have anything to do with the power going on and off in the house frequently, by chance? I can get the power to go off just by jumping around the room. Is that me doing that?


CAT: We’ve been having a lot of this type of phenomenon.

ELIAS: That is your energy.

CAT: (To Mike) Do you want to ask about your...? (To Elias) I want to ask about it but I’m not sure he does, and that’s not really my...

MIKE: I’ll allow you to ask. (To Elias) She has my permission.

ELIAS: Very well. (Chuckles)

CAT: I’m not sure this is related, but for some reason I thought it was related to the water and the sinks clogging. We’ve had a lot of water issues, and I didn’t know if that was a form of communication. But also, he has gotten two different abscesses in the last six months on his neck, so we thought maybe there was a communication regarding communication.

ELIAS: Regarding communication in what capacity?

MIKE: Maybe not fully expressing myself?

ELIAS: Ah! That would be more accurate.

CAT: So he’s creating a giant lump on his neck to get him to...?

ELIAS: What energy center is this?

MIKE: It’s the throat.

ELIAS: Correct.

MIKE: So it has to do with communication and expression.

ELIAS: Correct, and an allowance of your own expression and an allowance of yourself to be expressing freely and not restraining yourself and restricting yourself.

CAT: Does that mean he is restricting himself in some way?


CAT: (To Mike) Are you consciously aware of it?

MIKE: Yes, that’s why I didn’t want to ask.


MIKE: I already knew the answer.

ELIAS: (Smiling) I am quite aware.

CAT: I knew the answer as well, but I like to hear it!

ELIAS: (Chuckles) Continue.

MIKE: As you’ve probably already picked up on, I do restrain myself quite diligently.

ELIAS: And quite regularly.

MIKE: Yes. Do you think I’ll let go?

ELIAS: It is not a matter of what I think. I may express to you that I do not think. But...

MIKE: What do you feel, believe, perceive? Since perception is the key.

CAT: In our reality.

ELIAS: Correct.

Now; I may express to you what I view, but what is significant is that it is your choice.

Now; recognize that you do incorporate the potential to be allowing. I am understanding of your restriction of yourself and the fear that is associated with that, which is considerable and which is a strong factor in what you generate in this constriction of yourself. In this, I may express to you that you do incorporate the potential to be generating that allowance of yourself and the allowance of your own freedom, and this is the point. I am also aware that it may be helpful to engage information to be encouraging with you, for I am aware that you are not entirely objectively aware of all of the influences that you are generating in association with your beliefs that create this action and restricts you.

Many times individuals incorporate physical manifestations in conjunction with their own movements of restricting themselves. They incorporate these manifestations not merely as a signal to themselves to be paying attention, but also as a reflection of what they are restricting in their energy. Generally speaking, although not always, whatever area you are restricting yourself within in conjunction with your energy centers, your energy field responds to, and that generates a signal to the physical body consciousness to manifest some element within the physical body in conjunction with that physical area. Therefore, it is not unusual that you would choose to be creating a physical manifestation within this particular area.

Now; in this, let me also express to you that this is not unusual many times with individuals that are aligning with or belonging to the family of Tumold, for in actuality it is a purposeful action. In conjunction with this particular family, one of the qualities of this family is an expression of experiencing to more fully understand in interactions with other individuals. Therefore, if you incorporate a restriction of yourself in conjunction with physical manifestations and you interact with another individual that is manifesting in some similar manner, not necessarily the same, you generate a greater understanding, which is the compassion in conjunction with the other individual, and (you) may manipulate your energy more efficiently in relation to other individuals.

Now; what is significant is that you understand your own manifestation and that you allow yourself the recognition of your own abilities to manipulate energy, and in this, what beliefs are influencing you to be generating this constriction.

The fear is generated in association with your beliefs concerning other individuals and how other individuals perceive you. It is also associated with exposure, that if you are expressing exposure of yourself, this creates a vulnerability, and there is a fear concerning that vulnerability and how it shall be responded to by other individuals, whether it shall be accepted by other individuals, and also how you shall perceive yourself in that vulnerability.

There are strong beliefs that you incorporate in association with persona and the projection of your energy and your projection of yourself as yourself, and your expectations of yourself of what is acceptable and what is better in how you should be perceived, how you wish to be perceived, and what constitutes strength and what constitutes weakness, which are very strong beliefs.

In this I may express to you, remember, exposure is a prerequisite to receiving. Receiving is important, for contrary to religious beliefs that express that giving is better than receiving, if you are not receiving, it hinders your ability to give. If you cannot receive, it hinders tremendously your ability to manipulate energy and to create, for it is a natural flow of energy.

There is a natural movement of energy that you all express, which is natural to consciousness. It is natural to essence. I have identified this in your common terms in association with magnetic and electric energy. These are merely terms. Electric energy is energy that is expressed outwardly and allows for the creation of manifestations. Magnetic energy is an energy that is generated inwardly. But without sufficient allowance of the magnetic energy, there is a hindrance of the electric energy, and therefore the manifestations outwardly are limited.

Now; this is a significant point with you individually in association with your orientation, which contributes to this restriction. For were you to incorporate the orientation of common, you would more naturally be motivated to express manifestation outwardly in production. Incorporating the orientation that you do, this is not as motivating, for it is not as natural. Therefore, that also may be reinforcing to your expression of restricting yourself.

Now; I may express to you suggestions. In this, recognizing your orientation and acknowledging your orientation, allow yourself to generate expressions that may be more easily accomplished initially. The orientation of soft, as I have expressed previously, is continuously interactive. If it is not continuously interactive, there is a block of energy and it becomes quite obvious to the individual, and it becomes quite frustrating and even conflicting. But understand that interaction is not necessarily always with individuals. You may be continuously interactive with many different elements within your environment.

I expressed an identification earlier in this conversation of elements which you deem to be living. I expressed that intentionally, for individuals that incorporate the orientation of soft distinguish quite strongly between expressions of consciousness that they deem to be living and those that they deem to be not. Those that they deem to be not are less concentrated upon and less noticed. Individuals of this orientation do not incorporate as much of their objective imagery that offers them information through manifestations that they deem to be not living.

An individual that is common or even intermediate may offer themselves information through imagery of a vehicle or through a billboard or a stone or a configuration of stones — many, many, many different objects, colors, different mechanical expressions. Any element within their environment may offer them information and may gain their attention. Generally speaking — although once again it is not a rule — but generally speaking, individuals that are soft, their attention moves to expressions of consciousness that are living: plants, creatures, individuals. This speaks to them, so to speak, and they pay attention to the different movements, the different energy expressions of these elements of consciousness.

Now; in knowing that and acknowledging your natural flow of energy and that this is your natural expression, I may suggest to you that you begin allowing yourself to incorporate increments of free expression with yourself in practicing with non-human elements of living consciousness, for that may be less threatening.

In this, as I express to you to practice allowing your free expression, let me offer you what is meant in that. Whenever you experience a hesitation within yourself — it may be in conjunction with another individual in an interaction, or it may be individually yourself that you may incorporate an idea, so to speak, of an action that you want to be incorporating and you experience a hesitation — with yourself individually, not in conjunction with another individual, in noticing that immediate hesitation allow yourself to stop, recognize the hesitation, acknowledge that you are hesitating, and thusly move in another direction and express in some manner, regardless of its volume, in conjunction with an actual physical living thing.

Let me offer another example. Let us say, hypothetically, you are engaging another individual and the other individual in conversation with yourself expresses in some manner that you experience a hesitation.

Now; once you recognize the hesitation, generally speaking immediately you shall know what you are hesitating with and what you are restricting yourself with and what you are preventing yourself from saying or doing.

Now; in that moment in acknowledgment of that, allow yourself to move to another expression of consciousness — not the individual — perhaps a plant, perhaps a creature, and allow yourself to express what you would not express to the individual in some capacity. Even if it is not to the fullest extent of what you wanted to express, allow yourself in some capacity to express to the other living thing.

That offers you an avenue of practice, but it also generates a different action: it interrupts the pattern. It allows for an outlet, which allows for an acknowledgment of yourself and offers you a practice, which reinforces your trust of yourself and your appreciation of yourself, and it also interrupts your automatic responses and therefore dissipates its strength.

MIKE: Thank you.

ELIAS: You are quite welcome.

CAT: Does this have anything to do with the dead animals we had for a while there that kept appearing in our yard? Is that his expression or was he creating that? I know we’re both creating it, but for a period of time we kept having dead animals show up.

ELIAS: (To Mike) No, this would not be your energy.

CAT: Was that me?

ELIAS: Yes. (To Mike) This would not be an expression of your energy, for that would be, in a manner of speaking, thwarting your own direction. (To Cat) This is imagery that you are presenting to yourself.

CAT: Why?

ELIAS: And your impression?

CAT: I have no idea! I thought about it several times, and I don’t really have a clue. It doesn’t really bother me. They come, they die, it’s okay, and we bury them. In fact, I think it bothered him more than it bothered me.

ELIAS: That is quite understandable.

CAT: I figured it was okay. They were just coming to die there.

ELIAS: And in this, your expression to yourself is two aspects. One is stopping. In those moments, it is your signal of stopping, of generating a movement that is, in your terms, not necessarily productive, and therefore you present imagery to yourself to stop. It is also imagery that you present to yourself in conjunction with allowance.

CAT: Does this have anything to do with my intent as a focus?

ELIAS: And what is your assessment of your intent?

CAT: I think it has to do with acceptance of self, but I figured we all have that one.

ELIAS: Correct.

CAT: But is that it?

ELIAS: No. As with all individuals, I encourage you to evaluate the entirety of your focus, not merely now or recently, but the entirety of your focus. Examine your experiences throughout your focus and discover the theme of those experiences, recognizing that it is a general theme and there are many specific directions that you incorporate in conjunction with that general theme.

CAT: I’m very rebellious. Does that have anything to do with my intent?

ELIAS: (Chuckles) Somewhat.

CAT: Do I have any twins in this focus now? Twin focuses?


CAT: I think I also wanted to ask in general about... (To Mike) Did you want to ask about your business at all?

MIKE: I think it’s already been answered, hasn’t it?

ELIAS: Is that in relation to what’s going on with his company?

MIKE: It’s restriction.

CAT: Well, start flowing it! (Elias chuckles)

In general, how are we doing in the Shift? I think both of us are quite ready to move into it, as everyone is that attracts themselves to this forum.

ELIAS: You already are.

CAT: We’re in the Shift?


CAT: How are we doing in that? Has anyone accepted themselves yet? Is there anyone now in this timeframe that’s fully accepted themselves? The little guys, maybe.

ELIAS: That would be a challenging question to be responding to, for that is implying an absolute. There are many individuals that are generating acceptance of themselves, but to incorporate the term of fully or completely would imply an absolute that they are finished, and that is not the situation. But yes, there are individuals that are accepting of themselves generally, for the most part, and there are individuals that are accepting beliefs now. Not perhaps entire belief systems, but they are accepting beliefs.

But as I expressed yesterday, there are not expressions of acceptance that are generated and thusly done. It is an on-going action. You accept in the moment. That does not eliminate the beliefs; it neutralizes them in the moment. But you continue to be offering yourselves opportunities to be accepting.

I may be encouraging to you that you recognize that the more that you generate that action of acceptance within the moment, the easier it becomes, for it becomes more familiar, and you generate that action much more quickly for you trust yourselves more.

CAT: I had a question and I just forgot it. Does my intent have anything to do with responsibility? I noticed I’ve been trying to get rid of all responsibilities. I run away from them, shy away from them in general, except for being personally responsible for myself.

ELIAS: That may be an avenue that you are incorporating in more of a specific, but that is not the general theme.

It is significant that individuals allow themselves to discover their intents themselves, for this is a manner in which you become much more familiar with yourselves. It is a significant process to understand your movements and your motivations and the reasons that you generate different actions, regardless of whether you deem them to be good or bad, for they all move within the theme of your intent.

In this, it is significant, especially within this time framework of this shift in consciousness, that individuals allow themselves to become more intimately familiar with themselves. It is not NECESSARY, but it IS significant, for most individuals do not wish to be generating trauma in association with this shift. Although there are some individuals that do choose that, but most individuals do not wish to be creating trauma.

The manner in which you avoid creating trauma is to be more familiar intimately with yourself, and therefore be aware of how you are manipulating energy and how you are creating your reality, and allow yourself the ability to intentionally create what you want through that trust of yourselves in knowing yourself and knowing what your abilities are and knowing what your capacity is.

CAT: About staying in the moment, if I’m doing the dishes or doing whatever, playing around, is it okay to fantasize about anything else? Is that still being in the moment?


CAT: So, like a child playing with blocks, I can have a whole castle there and I’m still in the moment?


CAT: I was having conflicts with that.

ELIAS: Yes. Many individuals are quite misunderstanding of this concept.

The reason that I emphasize to many individuals to be holding their attention in the now is not to be expressing an absolute to them or that they must only be paying attention to no other moment but the now. The most familiar action for most individuals is not to be paying attention in the now at all and to be projecting their attention either futurely or pastly and incorporating judgments and anxieties in conjunction with both, reproaching themselves for experiences and choices that they have generated pastly, experiencing anxiety in anticipation of what they may be creating in the future, and thusly experiencing what they term to be not merely frustration but a lack of control and a lack of an ability to be directing themselves at all.

In responsiveness to this, as I instruct them and suggest to them that they be paying more attention to what they are generating in the now, they may recognize the direction that they are generating and allow themselves to actually see what they are doing now that is creating that future or that past; for your past is continuously being altered by the present, for your perception is continuously changing. What actually occurred in one moment is changed multiple times as you recall it. Every time that you recall an action or an experience that you have incorporated, you shall recall it differently, and that recall of the event actually changes the event which occurred within the past.

CAT: It creates the event in the moment.

ELIAS: Correct. As to the future, that is being created now. If an individual is expressing an energy of anxiety now concerning what may be within the future, they are projecting that energy to create that very expression of their anxiety in the future, for the now shapes that. In this, it is significant that individuals pay attention to what they are actually generating now in conjunction with what they want.

Now; to be exclusively holding your attention in the now to the exclusion of all else is quite unrealistic, for this is not what you do. But to be projecting past or future to the exclusion of the now is also not efficient, and it hinders you for you do not allow yourself the power that you actually incorporate. You do not allow yourself the freedom that you actually deserve and that you want. Therefore, in moments in which I am discussing with other individuals concerning paying attention to the now, this is a suggestion to encourage them to not be so concentratedly focused in projecting, and to be remembering and aware of what they are doing now.

But none of you shall exclusively pay attention to the now and not incorporate any other projection of attention to other elements of your reality. You all incorporate some action of projection of future and past — or perhaps not even future or past, perhaps sideways into what you term to be fantasy, which is not necessarily fantasy but is listening to your communication of imagination, which steps you sideways into other areas of consciousness which you are communicating to yourself from.

In that action, it is inspiring, for that is the action of the communication of imagination, to be motivating and to be inspiring of you to be exploring more freely in other areas. If you are fantasizing, in actuality many times what you are actually doing in that communication is allowing yourself to tap into other areas of consciousness in which other manifestations are quite real, which is significant and important, for how that generates inspiration is you thusly translate into your reality in different manners and that inspires you to manifest different expressions within your reality.

CAT: So go ahead and encourage that in myself rather than attempt to repress it?

ELIAS: Quite! That is an avenue of communication, and I may express to you, why should you repress any of your communications?

CAT: I think it’s almost time. Was there anything else?

MIKE: Two things, actually. How many focuses have I had or do I have?

ELIAS: In this physical dimension, 782.

MIKE: Will I be in this specific one an exceptionally long time?

ELIAS: That would be your choice, my friend. (Laughs with Mike) You may, if you are so choosing. I may express to you, you do generate now that potential, but it is your choice. I may not express to any individual an absolute in these types of inquiries, for there is always the possibility in a moment that an individual may turn quite suddenly.

MIKE: I guess the reason for the question is that I feel that that potential is something truly exceptional, like 900 years or so. Is that insane? (Laughing)

ELIAS: No, and if you are so choosing, you may generate that. That is not a non-reality.

CAT: There is no non-reality, is there?

ELIAS: You are quite correct.

CAT: Good, because I want flying! Both of us are a little bit supposedly crazy in what we want.


CAT: Our desires are a little bit out there compared to others.

ELIAS: Ah, “out there.”

CAT: But they feel real to me. They feel like real potentials.

ELIAS: And they are quite real.

CAT: I’m going to keep encouraging them.

ELIAS: Ah. I may express to you a genuine encouragement, for I would also be considered quite unreal, and I may assure you that I am quite real! (Chuckles)

MIKE: Actually, can I ask one last question?

ELIAS: You may.

MIKE: There was some confusion on Saturday regarding the mechanisms for creating reality.

CAT: That’s a big question.

MIKE: No, this is yes or no, because I want to express it.

ELIAS: Very well.

MIKE: Essentially, I felt that there were people in the room saying that thought leads reality, and you disagreed with that, with what they believed was an absolute. Is that because the mechanism of creation is simply part of the choice of being here in the first place and it’s in our nature to be creative?


MIKE: It’s a natural act?

ELIAS: Yes, and it is not dependent upon thought. I may express to you, your evidence of this reality that thought does not precede creation and that it does not create is that you may think and think and think and not necessarily create and not necessarily manifest what you are thinking. If thought created your reality, whatever you thought would be manifest, and it is not.

I may express to you also an identification of another misconception. Individuals do incorporate a belief that thought creates their reality or creates a reality, and that it also creates an energy which manifests into an entity and projects from themselves and incorporates a target, so to speak, and this is quite incorrect. You may think whatever you think; that is merely a translation of communications that you are offering to yourself.

Therefore, fear not. If you encounter an individual and you are thinking, “I wish this individual would be run over by a truck,” that is not creating the action of any harmfulness occurring to another individual, for thought does not create reality or precede it.

MIKE: Thank you.

ELIAS: You are quite welcome.

CAT: Can I get my number of focuses as well before we hang up, so to speak?

ELIAS: Nine hundred three.

CAT: Hmm, I was close. All right, well, thank you very much and we’ll have to do this again.

ELIAS: You are very welcome. I shall anticipate our next meeting, and I shall be offering you both encouragement and supportiveness in my energy in your movements. Remember your exercise.

MIKE: Thank you.

ELIAS: And I shall be anticipating a progress report from you both. (Chuckles) To each of you, as always, in tremendous affection and great encouragement, au revoir.

MIKE: Au revoir.

Elias departs after 1 hour, 2 minutes.

(1) See 10/1/01.

©2006 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved

Copyright 2004 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.