“Playing in Energy”
Monday, August 11, 2003 (Private/Phone)
Participants: Mary (Michael) and Anjuli (Myranda)
(Elias arrives at 7:25 AM.) (Arrival time is 12 seconds.)
ANJULI: Yes, Elias, we are continuing. I just said to Mary I do not know exactly which of my many choices to choose for this session. (Laughs) We have had a fun, Mary and me. We created hot weather, very, very great heat in Germany and Europe, and this heat is called by the female form of the name Michael.
ELIAS: Ha ha ha! Interesting imagery you present yourself.
ANJULI: Ja, and it is since the group session in Germany, so isn’t it interesting? Is this an imagery for creating lots of energy?
ELIAS: As YOU connect with that, yes.
ANJULI: The others connect differently with it; the imagery has a different meaning for them.
ELIAS: (Laughs) But this is the imagery you have presented to yourself!
ANJULI: I take it for the turning point, as an imagery for the turning point.
ELIAS: I am quite understanding. Which does incorporate a tremendous energy, much similar to your expression of weather presently.
ANJULI: Yes. Meanwhile, I have decided to start a little bit with my impression games.
ELIAS: Very well.
ANJULI: I have some impressions about focuses with my Sisi focus. Is Ida Ferenczy a focus of the essence Mi?
ELIAS: Observing essence.
ANJULI: Is countess Marie Festetics a focus of Allie? (Pause)
ANJULI: And is the actress Katharina Schratt a focus of Lucille?
ELIAS: Observing essence.
ANJULI: Is the son of Franz Joseph and Sisi, Crown Prince Rudolf, a focus of Baruch?
ANJULI: And is his love, Maria Vetsera, a focus of Awan? (Pause)
ANJULI: There is a younger sister of Sisi who is called “Spatz.” Is this a focus of Thelma?
ELIAS: Observing essence.
ANJULI: Sisi’s teacher in Greek, Konstantin Christomanos, is he a focus of Iona? (Pause)
ANJULI: Then, is Therese von Lisieux a focus of Anateal? (Pause)
ANJULI: And Therese Neumann von Konnersreuth is also a focus of Anateal?
ELIAS: Observing essence.
ANJULI: Norah Jones, the daughter of the sitarist Ravi Shankar, is that a focus of Anateal?
ANJULI: Ah, that is great! (Elias laughs) The next one, I hope that gets a yes. The actor Brent Spiner, who is playing Data of Star Trek Enterprise, is that a focus of Eliantan?
ANJULI: Oh Elias, I am so glad that I chose to ask! (Elias chuckles) Isn’t that great. I love him so much. Now I know a present focus of Timothy/Eliantan. And Gene Roddenberry, is that a focus of Jiavani? (Pause)
ELIAS: Observing essence.
ANJULI: Or could be a focus of Nanaiis.
ELIAS: This is also an observing essence.
ANJULI: The German actor Florian Fitz, is that a focus of Demian?
ANJULI: Is the German actor Thomas Rühmann a focus of Tomkin?
ANJULI: In the past, I connected with two Dream Walkers I considered as my Dream Walkers at that time, and I have given them the names Mythos and Unicon. Nanaiis and I think Mythos could be a Dream Walker of Lawrence. (Pause)
ANJULI: Ah. With Unicon, I thought it is a Borledim Dream Walker, so is it the Dream Walker of Fontine? (Pause)
ANJULI: KC will be happy about those answers for our Dream Walker game. (Elias laughs) I have a few more Atlantis focuses for you. Kandaha, a focus of Arkandin?
ANJULI: Is Vee a focus of the essence Veerin?
ANJULI: Then is your focus in Atlantis, Elias, Ilanos? (Pause)
ANJULI: I have two impressions of focuses in Atlantis of Lawrence, one with the name Randel and one probably Tree-Ani.
ANJULI: Then some focuses in the 11:11 dimension — Enthia for Cynthia?
ANJULI: And Spock for Nanaiis?
ANJULI: Oh, Elias great! (Elias laughs) That is great. Then Oona, she felt her focus name in the 11:11 dimension is Lambda.
ANJULI: And Elban, is her focus name Aarral?
ANJULI: P’tuti for Ling Tu?
ANJULI: And Eleven for Elwen. (Pause)
ELIAS: No N.
ANJULI: The we come to the Folklore/Fairy dimension, to the Lord of the Rings focuses there. Is the elf Glorfindel a focus of Myranda?
ANJULI: The elf Elrond, is he a focus of Elronn?
ANJULI: Is Gandalf, the sorcerer, a focus of you, Elias?
ANJULI: Ah, Elias, Elias, isn’t that great. That is why the movie “The Lord of the Rings” is a Wingnut Production. (Elias laughs) For Aragorn, I had first thought he is a focus of Dunadin, but now I think he is a focus of Arkandin.
ANJULI: And Dunadin is his father, Arathorn?
ANJULI: For my focuses, we still have an AD focus left that is not confirmed: John Scott, Milumet/Tumold, common, emotional, a friend of the heir Arthur, brother of King Henry VIII. Arthur could be a focus of Archor. Is this all correct?
ANJULI: And my additional future focus, is that Govinda Ranjit, Milumet/Ilda, soft, emotional, from India, born April 1, 2006?
ANJULI: Oh, I was too early, Elias, look! (Elias laughs) One year too early this time.
Then we have our color landscape game, Elias. I will add to the transcripts all the colors I so far have for my game. I am coloring a picture with essence and focus colors, and I want to add to my picture for my future focus Andre Demre canary yellow as his focus color.
ANJULI: For my focus Myr van Anderson, raven black?
ANJULI: And for my splinter Roni Elwing, unicorn white?
ANJULI: Elias, originally I had 73 focuses, and I have investigated my focus number after getting my list of focuses confirmed by you. Partially the increased focus number is because I included the focuses in my list of focuses who fragmented later, but not all. Some are additional focuses, and I really increased my focus number. When I counted them I had 84, but I think I now increased my focus number again.
ANJULI: Now I have 90?
ANJULI: Ninety-one? (Elias laughs) Ja, I think I meanwhile got Mythe-Mythos, the BC focus of Mi, who is with Pythagoras and changed gender, as my focus. Maybe he fragmented into Myranda?
ELIAS: Not yet.
ANJULI: Not yet? But one of my additional focus is BC?
ANJULI: And I have two more AD focuses?
ANJULI: Do I have one more present focus?
ANJULI: The rest of the seven new additional focuses are future focuses?
ELIAS: Yes, for you fascinate yourself more intensely with the future.
ANJULI: Ah ja, I am aware, I am aware. (Elias laughs) Is one of the additional ones a splinter of Myr? Or not?
ANJULI: I thought he created some fun or he did some of the increasing of the future focuses as a game for me. (Elias laughs) Okay, 91, that is great. I will investigate and then in the next session I hopefully have them for you.
ELIAS: Ah, very well!
ANJULI: And Elias, I have another game, the Elias essence statistic game. I thought you said to Lynda you have 3001 focuses, but probably you did not count the fragmentations?
ELIAS: I expressed that I incorporate more than 3000, but have not expressed a specific number.
ANJULI: Ah, then you can have 3311.
ELIAS: (Laughs) Somewhat more.
ANJULI: More, Elias? 3333?
ELIAS: Now you are guessing!
ANJULI: I am hoping, not guessing. But it is more than 3300?
ELIAS: You are correct.
ANJULI: And this number, which I will feel, does this include your fragmentations?
ANJULI: Then I can feel two numbers, one with and one without the fragmentations?
ANJULI: This is going to be challenging! (Elias laughs) Then I have to think about your other focus numbers again, because I have thought... Your earliest focus in linear terms could be 23,521 BC?
ANJULI: Ah, that was correct. I thought you have 1631 BC focuses, but if you have so many focuses, there must be more? (Elias laughs) Is that number wrong?
ELIAS: You are what you term to be close with this number. And I may also express to you, I am aware of your impressioning as to identifying my focuses and you may be preparing yourself for my playfulness in my energy, which may be somewhat confusing. Ha ha ha!
ANJULI: That is a nice confusion, I am accepting it.
ELIAS: For in a manner of speaking, I am engaging your game of hide and seek with you.
ANJULI: Ja, we do that, we do that. Well, if I was wrong... (Elias laughs) Well, Elias, I thought you have probably about 60 percent common focuses.
ELIAS: Approximately. Correct.
ANJULI: I will have to ask the rest next time. I will play with you hide and seek.
ELIAS: Ha ha! Very well!
ANJULI: Ja, we will do that. Elias, after all your focuses in Regional Area 4 I am interacting with are focuses, you could have focus colors?
ANJULI: Your various attentions have focus colors?
ANJULI: Ah, then I can look for them and include them in my landscape game?
ELIAS: If you are so choosing, yes.
ANJULI: Ja, I am choosing. Then I have something else for to play. (Elias laughs) How long did we play? Well, then just a little bit of my essence tone game. We thought that Baruch, Elban and Nanaiis created an essence called Babananna.
ANJULI: Oh, they will love it! That was when we did our party in Atlantis — not the last one, the one before — and in that party we felt a lot of essence intimacy happening. That was in the beginning of the new wave.
ANJULI: During that party we were more aware of our essence intimacy connecting, and we did lots of fragmentations, sort of.
ANJULI: Elias, we in the Eliasfamily list tried to fragment an essence with the essence name Wingnut. (Elias laughs) We did our best. We were wondering if all of us can fragment that Wingnut essence. We were wondering if that is possible, that an essence fragments of about 50 people.
ANJULI: Did we all fragment it?
ELIAS: An essence, yes, but not with the entire identification of that particular word, for it is not including the final T.
ELIAS: Yes. (Both laugh)
ANJULI: That essence will sometimes get called Wingnut by us.
ELIAS: Very well, that...
ANJULI: And Elias, of course, you were too in that fragmentation.
ANJULI: And Lawrence can participate, too. Lawrence is, after all, also a member of our Eliasfamily. Is Lawrence also there, as one of the fragmenting essences?
ELIAS: Yes. And you may incorporate this word as your term of affection. Ha ha!
ANJULI: (Laughs) Oh, Elias, great. They will be happy. Recently the session came out in which I asked you about the dimension with the three cities, and suddenly I was wondering if Atlantis and this dimension are one and the same.
ELIAS: No, they are two different dimensions.
ANJULI: On the day when we did our first A-N-D meditation, I had an experience of as if my dimension started to disappear, and I had the feeling of being, so to speak, with one foot in another dimension. Was that Atlantis, and what experience has that been?
ELIAS: In a manner of speaking, yes, your identification of Atlantis is correct, but the experience that you generated was allowing yourself to project to one physical dimension and move sideways. Your interpretation is, in actuality, quite accurate, for in that stepping sideways, you moved yourself partially outside of the physical dimension, holding yourself or your attention in two areas simultaneously — not in another physical dimension, but in that one and also outside of a physical dimension, in a nonphysical area of consciousness.
ANJULI: In my dimension and in a nonphysical area and projecting to Atlantis?
ELIAS: No, your projection was to Atlantis, but...
ANJULI: From there I moved sideways.
ELIAS: Yes, yes.
ANJULI: During the last party we had, I tried to view more of Atlantis, and my Atlantean focus Renu suggested to merge with him. I had the feeling as if he experiences himself as being, so to speak, on many places at once, although he does not experience there being places. So they are not so singularly focused, and he is experiencing himself as if his focus is projecting to the future and to many areas, something like that?
ELIAS: Yes, although they incorporate both. They express that action at times, and also at times hold themselves in more of an expression of singularity, which is more familiar to you.
ANJULI: Then I saw as if he is viewing his dimension through what I called translucent honeycomb. What has that been?
ELIAS: Yes, this would be a translation. I am understanding. In this, what you are allowing yourself to connect to is a translation of how they view their reality in many different manners simultaneously, engaging that action of which you have previously described.
ANJULI: Do they connect with the crystal dimension where my crystal focus is, creating some sort of bleed-through? Because in our new age religion, some say that Atlantis had crystal technology. So I thought this imagery of many in our collective must be about some sort of crystal technology they have in the dimension of Atlantis. But when I connected with it, their crystal technology felt not so solid as we would think it to be. Is there a sort of bleed-through from the crystal dimension, and they also have a sort of crystal technology in the dimension of Atlantis?
ELIAS: Correct, and it is associated with that other physical dimension, although they translate the information that they connect to of that other dimension and incorporate that into a type of technology. Not that it is expressed in the crystal dimension as technology per se, but the Atlanteans translate that into a type of technology.
ANJULI: Ja, that is what I got. They also have such a crystal in the inner of this building or structure which Nanaiis and Leland connected with, and the others?
ANJULI: Are they androgyne? They don’t have gender, they are sort of like elves or what?
ELIAS: In which dimension?
ANJULI: In Atlantis.
ELIAS: They do incorporate gender, but they procreate differently than yourselves.
ANJULI: But not two genders, more than two?
ELIAS: In actuality, it is or it may be more likened to one gender that incorporates the ability to change in several different genders.
ANJULI: The Atlantis dimension, is it connecting with the dimension with the three cities?
ELIAS: It is aware of that dimension, yes.
ANJULI: Do they visit each other?
ANJULI: My dream of my future focus Aimee, she was flying in a craft and was visiting a planet — I think it could be a future colony on the moon, this city with small colorful houses. I felt it to be a sort of colony, and outside there is a sort of desert or so. I thought if it is in the future and if there is a sort of colony on the moon? Or was that another dimension?
ELIAS: You are correct, but not your moon.
ANJULI: The other dream I had, when she was in a house on a wide flat land, was that also Aimee? She was then on a spaceship and she was so happy to be on it. She was trained there. I had the feeling it could be a spaceship from her future.
ANJULI: Then a third dream of her, she was on that spaceship, I think, and then she was visited at night by an other-dimensional focus of our essence. She covered herself with a white sheet at first but she was not afraid of him. Then she was beamed on their ship. My translation in the dream of that other focus was looking like we are but with another kind of head. I don’t know.
ANJULI: That is a dimension I have not yet mentioned in my other sessions?
ELIAS: Correct. They incorporate much more elongated bodies also. They are much taller than yourselves.
ANJULI: Ah, Elias, lots of information. (Elias laughs) When we are done with this blink, we have another one after all?
ANJULI: But the other blinks, although we may connect linear time with them, but they are all simultaneous?
ANJULI: And the new blink, which we think to come after this blink, do I have focuses there?
ELIAS: Yes. Ah, more to investigate!
ANJULI: Then they can be counted, Elias? I can count them?
ANJULI: That other blink, it probably feels like another dimension. Is it very different?
ELIAS: Somewhat, not extremely, but it is somewhat different, yes.
ANJULI: Well, Elias, please, you have to be there, too. (Elias laughs) You are so interested in this dimension, I am sure you are there.
ELIAS: (Chuckles) Correct.
ANJULI: Now I have something to investigate! I think I have more focuses in that blink.
ANJULI: The old blink, the one which did not work, that was the blink with the animal-men, a mixture of animals and humans?
ANJULI: I think I had focuses there?
ANJULI: Well, Elias, and when we have many blinks, just think of what I can investigate!
ELIAS: (Laughs) The possibilities are endless!
ANJULI: Well, for now I have those two blinks to investigate. I will do that. Now, this dimension — I am now viewing this dimension so differently. First I was really thinking this part of our dimension is a planet. That is how it is designed, I had thought. There are people, and once the people are born they are there so they are not created in the now, and I am sort of with the energy going into something physical, my body. Now my view of this dimension is so completely different.
ELIAS: Expanding your awareness.
ANJULI: Ja, and now it feels it is all energy. I feel there are all of our focuses and the focuses are all energy. They are having an objective awareness and with the objective awareness they create the collective and the entire world. It feels to me that is an imagery, so it does not feel solid any more. It is as if I am now not connecting with a planet with people on it but with energies.
ELIAS: Yes, I am understanding.
ANJULI: Is this how you view this dimension?
ANJULI: Well, so our dimension is not necessarily what we call a planet, that is our belief.
ELIAS: That is merely one aspect of your dimension. You generate, you create an entire universe within your physical dimension.
ANJULI: Yes, I know, Elias, but the planet we... Because we said in the past we thought it to be flat and now we think it to be round.
ANJULI: Ja, but now we can also view it differently. For example, I don’t experience distance anymore; that feels different.
ELIAS: I am understanding. This is the experience of expanding your awareness and recognizing that although you do create quite real objects within your physical reality, and they are quite physical and they appear to be quite solid, they are not quite as solid as they appear, and they are all energy.
ANJULI: All the objects we view as being an absolute and not being able to change form, all can change form.
ANJULI: Even the trees can change color, for example?
ANJULI: They can walk, I can create them standing somewhere else?
ANJULI: So everything I think to not be possible is possible.
ELIAS: You are quite correct, Myranda. (Laughs)
ANJULI: Oh Elias, I had lots of fun with thinking about absolutes, where I am thinking I have absolutes and that it can be different. That is so playful to think of that.
ELIAS: And this is the point of this wave.
ANJULI: Ja, that is a fun wave, Elias. That is definitely more fun than duplicity, for example. (Elias laughs) But Elias, then what we thought to be the blueprint of our dimension, that is not the blueprint. These are our scientific beliefs, which we think they are absolutes and how our dimension is.
ANJULI: So what is our blueprint? Our blueprint is about our beliefs?
ELIAS: Your beliefs and your manifestations and how you have created all of these physical expressions and associations, these are the blueprints of your reality.
ANJULI: Ja, but not how objects look like or how bodies look like?
ELIAS: Partially. That is also an aspect of the blueprint, but not necessarily entirely in the manner in which your sciences explain it.
ANJULI: Ja. So when we, for example, think about absolutes, we certainly think that children can only be born after a pregnancy.
ANJULI: Is that also an absolute and can be different?
ELIAS: It can be different, but this also is an element of the blueprint of the design of your physical dimension. The physical manifestations and the manner in which they are created are an aspect of the design of the blueprint of this dimension, to be incorporating two genders and to be incorporating a specific manner in which a new manifestation shall be introduced into your physical reality in association with time.
ANJULI: So I could not, for example, create translating an...
ELIAS: I am not expressing this to you. I am not expressing to you that you cannot.
ANJULI: Oh, the design is like this, but that design also includes that we can do it differently than we usually do it?
ELIAS: Yes. That is the expression of no absolutes.
Now; generally speaking, for the most part you do not alter some expressions of your manifestations, for they have been generated as your truths. Generally speaking, you do not manifest as one gender and at some midpoint within your time framework physically alter your gender at will. This is not to say that it is impossible. It is not impossible. But this has been generated as one of your truths.
ANJULI: Ja, so far we had that as one of our truths, and within our new wave we now identify that there are no absolutes, so some may choose to create now differently.
ELIAS: This is correct, or you may choose as I have stated. Generally speaking, you shall choose to continue to create in some manners, knowing that this may be one of your truths, but also knowing that it is not an absolute, but it may be a preference.
ANJULI: So those truths we like, we continue to have, but we know that these are our truths and they are not absolutes. This is then a difference.
ELIAS: Correct, which offers you more freedom.
Now; as to some of these truths such as concerning gender, you may be quite satisfied with what you have generated, what you have manifest in relation to your gender. Therefore, you incorporate no motivation to alter that or even to experiment with that not being an absolute. But merely the recognition and the knowledge and the reality that it is not absolute and it is not true is liberating, for it allows you to move in more creative expressions and to recognize those expressions that are limiting to you in association with whatever your truth is.
ANJULI: I would very much like to experiment with changing some of my truths and experimenting with doing some fun. (Elias laughs) I am still practicing. Do you think I have already a little bit accepted my beliefs into absolutes so that I now can start changing a few things?
ELIAS: Yes. You are beginning, yes.
ANJULI: Elias, I love my gender a lot, but when I create being in physical solidity on my island with you, on one occasion I might think of changing my gender temporarily.
ELIAS: Very well!
ANJULI: It is just fun to play with the thought of freedom.
ELIAS: I am understanding, and I shall be encouraging of you to be attempting to incorporate that experimentation!
ANJULI: Then, Elias, I am, of course, a lot experimenting in feeling your energy and how that would then be simultaneously translated into imagery.
ANJULI: So I am, for example, translating you into a form, although not solid, and then interacting with you. I am experimenting to at the same time feel your energy and how this energy fits to the translation of that form and that interaction.
ANJULI: Was I translating you correctly within the energy that you expressed?
ELIAS: It is not a matter of correct.
ANJULI: Well, there are various choices of how I can translate it, but I don’t want to create my Elias, I want to create your Elias. You know what I mean?
ELIAS: Ah, but it is an exchange, and therefore it is a combination of both. For in your creation of me, you incorporate your communication of imagination and you allow for a manifestation in relation to that, but you are translating the energy in the manner that I am projecting it. It is quite similar to the action that you generate within each of your days and every interaction that you engage with any other individual within your physical dimension. You interact...
ANJULI: But I sometimes reconfigure them and I don’t want to reconfigure you.
ELIAS: I am understanding. But even in your reconfiguration as to a physical manifestation, generally speaking you do not reconfigure the energy expression, with the exception of very slight alterations. You configure the energy in the manner in which the other individual is projecting it. This is the reason that you incorporate such tremendous variety in appearances. You do not generate all of the individuals within your reality to appear the same, do you?
ELIAS: And the reason that you do not is that you are actually interactive with another individual’s projection of energy, and you are configuring that in the manner in which they have configured it to generate an appearance.
ANJULI: Oh. But I thought sometimes we do it differently.
ELIAS: You may, but as to actual physical appearance, generally speaking...
ANJULI: Oh, the appearance, but the way they act or what they say...
ELIAS: Yes, THAT you do reconfigure at times. Therefore, in your interaction with myself, what you view as an appearance is what I have projected and you are not reconfiguring that energy.
ANJULI: Then I do not have to think of how you look like. You project an energy and then I automatically feel you looking like this.
ANJULI: Then I don’t have to think that it is difficult!
ELIAS: Correct. (Laughs)
ANJULI: In our interactions, I am discovering how much I am enjoying genuine intimacy in energy. I had not thought that it can be such a fun. It is almost even more fun than physical intimacy, although that is fun also.
ELIAS: I am understanding, and perhaps you may share that experience with your mother.
ANJULI: Yes, yes. I had not thought that energy intimacy can be such a pleasure. And Elias, it can be intensified, increased?
ANJULI: When I am more allowing it, more practicing, because this is new for me. Maybe I don’t know how energy experiences can feel.
ELIAS: But you are experimenting and you are allowing yourself to move in that direction. (Chuckles)
ANJULI: Elias, what are the various energy games we can do?
ELIAS: Whatever you choose. You may express ANY direction and ANY type of action, allowing yourself an entire freedom to move in whatever expression you choose. But you are not constrained by solid physical bodies, therefore you may move in and out of the translucent bodies and you may mingle and you may generate many different types of experiences.
ANJULI: I can generate just nonphysical experiences or translate you in translucent or translate you into what I have not yet done, into solid?
ANJULI: Or I translate you into talking to me, talking through my little unicorn...
ANJULI: Everything I like.
ELIAS: Yes. And you may incorporate an energy interaction similar to your colors, recognize how you may incorporate the blending of many different colors and generate new colors from those blendings. You may, in a manner of speaking, generate that in experiences in energy interactions, blending the energies to create new experiences.
ANJULI: Blending my and your energy, like our energy mixes?
ANJULI: And within our energy mixes we can play infinitely.
ELIAS: Yes. (Laughs)
ANJULI: Even though I don’t know what I can play, but I am curious and then I am open. Then you suggest something or I suggest something, and I don’t even know what I suggest. (Elias laughs) But that works?
ELIAS: But it matters not, for this allows you freedom for you are not constrained by expectations of what should be. You are merely open to the surprise. And as I have stated, your mother may engage this type of action also with her partner.
ANJULI: When you and me and the other essences had this experience with the bubbles, what has that been? Because there were not separate essences anymore, just energy bubbles.
ANJULI: It was not like a mergence, it was bubbles.
ELIAS: I am understanding.
ANJULI: There a bit Ordin, there a bit me, there a bit you, there a bit... What was that?
ELIAS: That is your translation of moving into a conceptualization which is more accurate in association with essences and consciousness, that there is actually no separation, that even in an identification of what you term to be a thing such as a bubble, it is not singular and its identity or the association of the identity is not singular.
ANJULI: I was thinking a little bit of what memory is. So far we always had sort of the same memory of the past. I am playing with that, imagining like Runi was doing in my book, that I probably don’t remember and am choosing that to play with a new memory, sort of. But I am sort of not sure anymore what a memory is.
ELIAS: It is a recalled perception, so to speak, but that is also changeable.
ANJULI: I can play that although I have a certain memory of a certain past, I also have forgotten another one, the one which is a new perception.
ANJULI: So like Runi and Inmi have been doing, I sort of have forgotten, and who knows what interesting memories I am now creating?
ELIAS: (Laughs) Which may be another playful game! And perhaps be remembering or generating a memory of probable selves, for they are also all you.
ANJULI: You mean new probable selves?
ELIAS: Or what you term to be past probable selves.
ANJULI: Ja, remember their memories.
ELIAS: Yes, for they are yours also. (30-second pause)
ANJULI: Right now, in this time, I am a lot drawn into energy experiences similar to my mother, probably not so much into actions or physical... I’m interested in translating it into physical but not in normal life, sort of.
ELIAS: I am understanding. For in this time framework, it is more curious to you and more fascinating to you to be experimenting with energy projections and configurations of energy and how to be manipulating that in association with yourself in association with myself, with other essences, and discovering what your abilities are in allowing yourself to be manipulating energy.
ANJULI: Elias, recently I was connecting with Vicki/Lawrence. Is this correct, that she played with me a little bit? I wanted to have somebody to be curious about other dimensions, sort of. She played, encouraging me, and she sort of connected with me like that.
ANJULI: She feels quite nonphysical meanwhile.
ANJULI: It was a very happy experience, because she played with me, dimension-dancing with me.
ELIAS: I am understanding. I may express to you that within nonphysical areas of consciousness, Lawrence is quite playful and also incorporates a fascination with other dimensional focuses, and in that is aware of individuals within your physical dimension that share a fascination with other dimensional focuses, and therefore is encouraging of their movement to be exploring.
ANJULI: So I can incorporate her in my innernet group and even translate her into form.
ELIAS: If you are so choosing, yes.
ANJULI: The talk already is so real I don’t feel the need for form. The interaction was so like a new friend, and old-new friend.
ELIAS: I am quite understanding. (Pause)
ANJULI: Why is it feeling different when I am typing, when I try to write down what I feel in energy and translate that into words and write in into my computer? Why does it feel so different if I don’t write it down and just focus on you?
ELIAS: For it is somewhat challenging or difficult to express in your language of words what the translation is of these experiences. As extensive as your languages in words are, they are not extensive enough to incorporate an accurate explanation or translation of the actual experiences.
ANJULI: I understand. Of course when I don’t do it, I am sometimes translating parts into words but they are only a little part.
ANJULI: I feel the rest also and they are not words and it is much more...
ELIAS: Expansive. Yes. You are correct. (40-second pause)
ANJULI: Your energy is fun.
ELIAS: (Laughs) Of course!
ANJULI: Elias, why are you so similar to Arkandin? You are really confusing. (Elias laughs) I thought of creating a new concept about Arkandin, Veerin and you, creating some sort of new... Something must be there. I mean, with Veerin he fragmented from the both of you, but Arkandin and you, that’s more than similarity or overlapping or something like that. He’s really like a second Elias.
ELIAS: And perhaps you shall be experimenting in energy and offer yourself information to this quandary.
ANJULI: Sounds interesting, that word.
ELIAS: It is a type of puzzlement. (Laughs)
ANJULI: For now I am calling them the three Elias essences.
ELIAS: Very well! (Chuckles)
ANJULI: How is Michael doing?
ELIAS: Well, but also incorporating a slight wavering. Very well, my friend.
ANJULI: We’ll continue offline, so to speak.
ELIAS: As always! And as always, I offer my affection to you and to your mother, and my great encouragement and playfulness.
ANJULI: Thank you, Elias. I love you a lot.
ELIAS: To you, Myranda in great lovingness, au revoir.
ANJULI: Au revoir.
Elias departs at 8:31 AM.
(1) The first part of Anjuli’s session is an x-file.
©2006 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved
Copyright 2003 Mary Ennis, All Rights Reserved.